• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Be sure to sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

The Battling, The Injuries and More Injuries

Im saying only way i feel like that call is a good one is if we planned on going for 2 both times to win game.. other than that, it really wasnt a good call.. no way thats a good call bro like at all
Why though? I already spelled out how it gives you a better chance to win the game. Why is it a bad call other than going against football traditionalism?
 
moral victory

TBH, I'd be fine missing the playoffs if Lamar Jackson was healthy at the end of the season rather than make the playoffs and know he would have to go under the knife and miss the offseason and possibly the beginning of the year. Know a sprained ankle won't do that to him, but a more severe injury would.
I guess I'm still hoping that we can scrape into the playoffs and discover something about our team that kick-starts our season. The receiver group in particular is still very talented (including Andrews in that) so if we hit on a formula - like up-tempo or just balls-to-the-wall letting it fly then I do believe we can still be dangerous. The defence, for what it's worth, are still fighting like hell. Even a small spark on offense could change the complexion of things.
 

D1City55

Pro Bowler
Good: Really like Bateman, he's going to be a star next year. Physical outside play that we've been missing for a long time. Bowser is a monster and he's only getting better. He was dominant today. Westry played really well and I hated the PI call, I seriously don't understand it but he's got good length and speed. Huntley played well too, he just needs better pocket awareness for right now.

Bad: We have the worst tackle duo in Football. They literally cost us the game and Philips effort is downright pathetic. Villuaneva was awful and I hope he's not back on the team next year, even as a back up. Not only did he allow that strip sack but he had 2 holding penalties. Garrett is a generational talent with elite bend and is a tough match up for just about anyone but Big Al sold hard today.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
To be fair, Huntley trusted Bateman more and gives him chances to make plays on the ball 1v1. Lamar probably would’ve either threw to a double-team’d Andrews or held on to the ball, trying to elude..only to get sack.

Let’s be honest with ourselves.. Lamar haven’t been playing well this past couple of games.

I wouldn’t go that far to say Huntley better than Lamar though.

worth pointing out that on at least one of those bateman plays, huntley made a poor throw into double coverage and bateman just made a great play on a ball in the air
 

BoredMarine13

Ravens Ring of Honor
Yeah put one on Lamar’s helmet as well.

Seriously . It’s sad I was pumped when Huntley atleast threw the ball away. Kept us in manageable downs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
Other thing that's bugging me is that we saw a comeback with great play after great play, but apparently that's *all* Huntley/Bateman. Then one play fails and it's "fuck Roman, fire his ass". We call that confirmation bias in my work.

exactly - had a great playcall just before the 2 minute warning that would have saved us oodles of time on the clock when he called the hollywood bomb

we just have to be consistent about what a bad playcall or design actually is - most failed plays arent bad playcalls
 

RavensMania

Staff Member
Administrator
worth pointing out that on at least one of those bateman plays, huntley made a poor throw into double coverage and bateman just made a great play on a ball in the air
and that catch on the sideline I thought for sure that pass was long, but Bateman made a great play on the ball.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
Honestly the single most interesting thing to me is why did we not have a problem getting the snaps off on time at all with Huntley. We definitely saw that was still an issue with Lamar.

Did Roman attempt to simplify things a little bit and it inadvertently ended up being more successful?

game situation - we were trailing by 2-3 scores... can't huddle in the same way
and we didnt have clock issues before lamar left either - we ran a load of no huddle/tempo stuff before huntley came in too
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
You bring up a good point. And I try to remind myself of that. Like in the last game, Roman drew up a game winning play. The players failed to execute.

That said, I'm not a fan of Roman and I want him replaced. He's not able to take the league by surprise anymore.

it's perfectly reasonable to desire a change for various reasons - we just have to be honest about what's happening on some of these plays and not going after roman for poor execution (not every bad play is his fault)
 

Simba

Staff Member
Moderator
It was an interesting game.

Major props to Huntley for hanging in there. You can see the lack of awareness and lack of arm strength but he's more than capable as a backup. Give him a full battery of weapons (aka a running game) and we probably find a way to pull this one out without Lamar.

And no problems on my end for going for 2 early. I think it's funny that it's always the "old heads" that question these things. You need 2 at some point... you can do it early and know what else you need to do or you can do it on the last one an be put in a do or die situation essentially. I have greater problems with the play call and limiting yourself to half of the field in already crowded area.

But the simple reality... we have too much against us at this point. Injuries have killed us. I'm proud that this team continues to fight but they simply aren't good enough to keep overcoming.
 
Seriously . It’s sad I was pumped when Huntley atleast threw the ball away. Kept us in manageable downs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah just those sack fumbles though. Give him credit though he played well enough to get us back in the game and a chance to win at the end.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
Im saying only way i feel like that call is a good one is if we planned on going for 2 both times to win game.. other than that, it really wasnt a good call.. no way thats a good call bro like at all

it's the only way to make the call - it's so obvious that it shouldnt be remotely controversial (because almost every HC does it this way now)

the reason you go for it the first time is really simple...
if you don't get it, you have more time to game-plan around not getting it and you know whether you need 1 score or 2 scores with more time to adjust one way or the other

if you kick the pat then you have learnt nothing, you still need a 2pt conversion, but now you've got less time to adjust if you dont make it

sure you've kept it a 1 score game for longer but that's meaningless if you're going to lose anyway
 

BoredMarine13

Ravens Ring of Honor
Yeah just those sack fumbles though. Give him credit though he played well enough to get us back in the game and a chance to win at the end.

He definitely deserves a lot of love. He was really good at getting the offense lined up and just rolling with what the defense gave him. Also love a few of those tosses giving his WRs a chance 1v1. I think i even saw a back shoulder throw !!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
He definitely deserves a lot of love. He was really good at getting the offense lined up and just rolling with what the defense gave him. Also love a few of those tosses giving his WRs a chance 1v1. I think i even saw a back shoulder throw !!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

tried back-shoulder three times i think
first one was a miscommunication with watkins
second one was the bateman OPI
and i think he was trying for a 3rd one on the bateman catch (that should have been a TD) but put it too far inside

but that's the power of the underthrown ball in the NFL - receivers can adjust to it in the air
 

BoredMarine13

Ravens Ring of Honor
you mean when he threw the ball away... and got called for intentional grounding?

Same series on an earlier down, throws the ball out of bounds. No grounding , leaves us with 10 to go rather than 14 or 15. Gets called for grounding a few plays later , o well , can’t win them all. Still played well


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top