I was wrong about the 90%, it was actually 75% of cases going back to the 16th century (here's an excellent read on the phenomenon - and before anyone accuses me of peddling leftist propaganda this was written while Obama was president) but I suspect if you went back beyond that France-Hapbsburgs clash the number would increase. But it's the kind of dynamic that requires a delicate touch and a more nuanced approach than simply seeing things in terms of winners and losers where the winners take all and the losers get crushed. That's why every foreign minister in the Asia-Pacific is on edge atm.
Solving climate change and the move to renewables are a great avenue for forming a co-operative and productive relationship between the world's major powers while creating massive new export markets. I mean, you're literally looking at the most likely solution for bringing about world peace AND making a fuck ton of money for everyone in the process. What's not to like?
And that’s one of the things I really don’t understand because fossil fuel power is at its most efficient virtually (marginal gains at most) but renewables have so many different methods and are still so untapped that there is a lot of advancement and development available + once you get renewables into the electric grid your energy company can market themselves as a clean energy provider and I know in the uk at least that sometimes people agree to pay more per month (within reason) if the company is producing lots of clean energy