it's not about not seeing the good, it's about weighing their values vs their weaknesses or flaws and it makes murray not a prospect many of us would want in the first round
that does not mean he doesnt possess qualities that would be exciting and are major positives
e.g. i do not want murray, i think he's raw and has lots of mental errors on film and has some flaws that will take major changes to get over in the NFL - feels like a risky projection to the pro level
if we were to draft him that first statement would still be true - but he'd be a raven so my focus would turn to the fact that he has dynamic elite athleticism for the position he'd play and the ability to be a game-changer in a defence with pieces around him - many of his flaws are potentially fixable and we dont know what coaching he got at oklahoma
both statements can be true at the same time - i dont want us to draft kenneth murray in the 1st round (or the 2nd round for that matter) but im not going to avoid finding positives if we do draft him - that would be an odd thing to want to do - i wouldnt be forgetting what i thought before but id be pivoting to a new frame of mind: going from objective evaluation of who is the best prospect to a more focussed evaluation of how can this player help our team
