Thanks,I knew someone would remember.Dennis Kelly. He was coming off of injury at the time though and wasn't fully healthy.
Thanks,I knew someone would remember.Dennis Kelly. He was coming off of injury at the time though and wasn't fully healthy.
Not going to lie I've given him so flack before but I really think he's a big-time player who would be even better if he had a better scheme, offensive mind, and if Lamar wasn't going through his struggles(ATM). Not to mention the numerous blitz concepts that we're having trouble with, poor OL play, and non-existent run game that plays a huge role. The loss of play-action has really hurt his overall effectiveness. All in all he's a really good WR who could potentially be elite IMO.maybe some will disagree (they probably will) but Hollywood’s been my guy since before we drafted him - I absolutely think he should be in our future plans - keeping this skill position group together for the medium to long-term would be awesome
I don’t think he’ll play and I hope he doesn’t play. Ankle injury behind that offensive line is a recipe for disaster and I don’t want him to get injured to the point where it affects the start of next yearIs anybody optimistic that my son Lamar will suit up against the Packers? I can't imagine starting a game without him, if truth be told.
The “Lamar’s not playing” move…
Why in the hell would they play Johnson over Huntley? In what world does that make sense lol
it's not about johnson over huntley - it's about having a backup if/when lamar's not ready to go
agreed
Ohhh... I misread the "active" part. Of course he'll be active as a backup. I thought he said something about him starting Sunday. Duh
harbs only said there's potential to need johnson this week
Well, realistically, if Lamar is active on Sunday, they may even need to activate 3 QBs for gameday. He would be ripe for an in-game setback, and then you'd have nobody behind Huntley.it's not about johnson over huntley - it's about having a backup if/when lamar's not ready to go
Well, realistically, if Lamar is active on Sunday, they may even need to activate 3 QBs for gameday. He would be ripe for an in-game setback, and then you'd have nobody behind Huntley.
Well, realistically, if Lamar is active on Sunday, they may even need to activate 3 QBs for gameday. He would be ripe for an in-game setback, and then you'd have nobody behind Huntley.
all this signing really says is that they have no faith in chris streveler as the 3rd QB
I mean would you?
no not at all lol - josh johnson was one of the guys i fully expected us to go after when we lost mcsorely...
all this signing really says is that they have no faith in chris streveler as the 3rd QB
He is my son, not yours. Let me make that decision dude!!I don’t think he’ll play and I hope he doesn’t play. Ankle injury behind that offensive line is a recipe for disaster and I don’t want him to get injured to the point where it affects the start of next year