• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Be sure to sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

The 2022 Offseason Thread

Michael M.

Pro Bowler
Yeah, OL is holding the offense back--not WR now. Lots of ways you can improve the team, one is to just go all-in on fixing the OL. It would be an investment and could play huge dividends for us but would sacrifice the defense. OL is so tough too because it's hard to know the question marks:

LT: will Stanley return? Do we need to find a replacement?
LG: is Ben Cleveland the guy to take it? Do we need a true LG here?
C: will Bozeman return? Do we have anyone who can play here on this team besides Mekari who wasn't great last time?
RG: can Zeitler play well again? He's getting old.
RT: is James or Mekari good enough to play here? Do we need to invest here?

Lots of question marks here on the OL. Too bad defense is also a dumpster fire in its own ways. Crazy how it changed so much from year to year since in 2020 it was a very good defense.
When you have that many questions, that means you have to address them. My geatest concern on offense: Ronnie Stanley. Second: draft a RT
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
Yeah, OL is holding the offense back--not WR now. Lots of ways you can improve the team, one is to just go all-in on fixing the OL. It would be an investment and could play huge dividends for us but would sacrifice the defense. OL is so tough too because it's hard to know the question marks:

LT: will Stanley return? Do we need to find a replacement?
LG: is Ben Cleveland the guy to take it? Do we need a true LG here?
C: will Bozeman return? Do we have anyone who can play here on this team besides Mekari who wasn't great last time?
RG: can Zeitler play well again? He's getting old.
RT: is James or Mekari good enough to play here? Do we need to invest here?

Lots of question marks here on the OL. Too bad defense is also a dumpster fire in its own ways. Crazy how it changed so much from year to year since in 2020 it was a very good defense.

there was always going to be a year where suddenly everything changed - we've been drafting offence and paying defence for a while, it was inevitable that at some point the young offensive guys would need to get paid and the defensive contracts would be ending and we'd need to start getting cheaper and younger on defence

a lot will be determined by our decisions before the draft but we're lucky that we have tons of picks to add talent so that even if that 1st pick goes on the OL that we've got 3 more day 2 picks and 5 more 4th rounders that we can spend elsewhere if that is how it goes
 

Tank

Hall of Famer
but we've never had an offence this talented before

we have an MVP QB, an all-pro TE, dangerous weapons and depth at both WR and RB and we've got an all-pro LT (if he comes back healthy) - OL really is the only place where this team is somewhat vulnerable on offence (without injuries) - the escalator impact of an effective offensive line is massive

and we've had good OLs since 2013... 2014, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 we had really pretty good OLs and 3 of those teams made the playoffs and one missed out in heart-breaking fashion because of tyler boyd

Not going down this rabbit hole but will say 2013 was much worse than now, and we haven’t had a truly competent center since Birk but for a brief period when Jensen was learning the position. We’ve had bits and pieces(Yanda, Stanley)but nothing that resembled “building a wall”.
 

Grim

Ravens Ring of Honor
there was always going to be a year where suddenly everything changed - we've been drafting offence and paying defence for a while, it was inevitable that at some point the young offensive guys would need to get paid and the defensive contracts would be ending and we'd need to start getting cheaper and younger on defence

a lot will be determined by our decisions before the draft but we're lucky that we have tons of picks to add talent so that even if that 1st pick goes on the OL that we've got 3 more day 2 picks and 5 more 4th rounders that we can spend elsewhere if that is how it goes
Yeah, I've gone back and forth on it but you take best available TBH and don't look back then address needs in the 2nd & 3rd for starters. We need a CB/S, DL, Edge, OL. The good thing is we do always address needs in FA then use Draft to compensate for misses. I'm sure we will be fine by Draft night in this regard. I think our CBs are actually solid in Humphrey, Peters, Young. The question is depth behind them and the rushers in front of them. Getting a 4-man rush is critical as is stopping the run to help the LBs. It's why I have DL as a higher need than secondary even if I think we need more playmakers and usually that's in the secondary. No doubt the offense needs a better OL to impact Lamar, JK & Gus, WRs & TEs. Our FO has their work cut out for them.

When you have that many questions, that means you have to address them. My geatest concern on offense: Ronnie Stanley. Second: draft a RT
True but I wouldn't necessarily say RT is a priority as much as others. For me, C is a higher need than RT. I think RT has options. We have nothing IMHO for C.
 

Grim

Ravens Ring of Honor
Not going down this rabbit hole but will say 2013 was much worse than now, and we haven’t had a truly competent center since Birk but for a brief period when Jensen was learning the position. We’ve had bits and pieces(Yanda, Stanley)but nothing that resembled “building a wall”.
I'd disagree that 2013 was worse than now. I think this OL was the worst I've ever seen. 2013 had Yanda & Monroe who were both solid & exceptional. There is no HOF OL on this team who isn't injured right now. Stanley didn't play and no idea where he is in healing. Zeitler isn't Yanda. Bozeman is OK, Cleveland has potential, etc. but the 2013 OL was bad but this one edges it out IMHO.
 

RavensMania

Staff Member
Administrator
Peters is also one of the smartest players in the league. The way he's able to read plays and be in the perfect position to get picks makes him the best ballhawk since Ed Reed. I think it would be a massive mistake if we got rid of him and honestly hope he's a Raven for the rest of his career.
Glad he was the player I wanted the Ravens to draft in 2015. Unfortunately KC took him a few picks before we were on the clock. Would have saved us the trouble the Perriman years, for sure.
 

RavensMania

Staff Member
Administrator
but we've never had an offence this talented before

we have an MVP QB, an all-pro TE, dangerous weapons and depth at both WR and RB and we've got an all-pro LT (if he comes back healthy) - OL really is the only place where this team is somewhat vulnerable on offence (without injuries) - the escalator impact of an effective offensive line is massive

and we've had good OLs since 2013... 2014, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 we had really pretty good OLs and 3 of those teams made the playoffs and one missed out in heart-breaking fashion because of tyler boyd
this year the loss of OBJ and Ronnie Stanley as well as AV not working on the right side or left for that matter was a huge issue. If AV had worked as a right tackle and Stanley played well on the left side, that would have left Mekari as the swing tackle. That's a massive upgrade.
 

Tank

Hall of Famer
I'd disagree that 2013 was worse than now. I think this OL was the worst I've ever seen. 2013 had Yanda & Monroe who were both solid & exceptional. There is no HOF OL on this team who isn't injured right now. Stanley didn't play and no idea where he is in healing. Zeitler isn't Yanda. Bozeman is OK, Cleveland has potential, etc. but the 2013 OL was bad but this one edges it out IMHO.
It’s subjective but Gradkowski wasn’t even serviceable and Oher was almost as bad. Shipley. ugghh I think 3 holes may have been worse than 2 . lol
 

RavensMania

Staff Member
Administrator
Yeah, OL is holding the offense back--not WR now. Lots of ways you can improve the team, one is to just go all-in on fixing the OL. It would be an investment and could play huge dividends for us but would sacrifice the defense. OL is so tough too because it's hard to know the question marks:

LT: will Stanley return? Do we need to find a replacement?
LG: is Ben Cleveland the guy to take it? Do we need a true LG here?
C: will Bozeman return? Do we have anyone who can play here on this team besides Mekari who wasn't great last time?
RG: can Zeitler play well again? He's getting old.
RT: is James or Mekari good enough to play here? Do we need to invest here?

Lots of question marks here on the OL. Too bad defense is also a dumpster fire in its own ways. Crazy how it changed so much from year to year since in 2020 it was a very good defense.
Agree with everything you said on OL, except C I have a small change. I see Trystan Colon as the backup center and he's performed well in his limited chances. Yeah, with defense it's so many players that need to be retooled on the front seven and all at the same time. Makes it very difficult but getting younger will help long term. We have all seen this coming for a long time.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
Not going down this rabbit hole but will say 2013 was much worse than now, and we haven’t had a truly competent center since Birk but for a brief period when Jensen was learning the position. We’ve had bits and pieces(Yanda, Stanley)but nothing that resembled “building a wall”.

for sure 2013 was horrific lol - not saying it wasnt - 2021's (after all the injuries) was pretty horrifying too
just saying that we've had good OLs since then in that interim period

you're right that we've been missing consistent C play for much of that time but we've had competent play over those years at some points just not long-term consistency - Jensen as you say had 2017 where he was ascending, Skura anchored the OL well for 2018-2019 until he got injured and Bozeman gave us pretty decent play this year

and before that Zuttah gave us a couple of decent years (including a pro bowl year in 2016) - i know many disliked him but he was fine

that 2019 was probably the best unit we've had for a long while though - Stanley, Bozeman, Skura, Yanda, Orlando is pretty wall-like...
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
Yeah, I've gone back and forth on it but you take best available TBH and don't look back then address needs in the 2nd & 3rd for starters. We need a CB/S, DL, Edge, OL. The good thing is we do always address needs in FA then use Draft to compensate for misses. I'm sure we will be fine by Draft night in this regard. I think our CBs are actually solid in Humphrey, Peters, Young. The question is depth behind them and the rushers in front of them. Getting a 4-man rush is critical as is stopping the run to help the LBs. It's why I have DL as a higher need than secondary even if I think we need more playmakers and usually that's in the secondary. No doubt the offense needs a better OL to impact Lamar, JK & Gus, WRs & TEs. Our FO has their work cut out for them.


True but I wouldn't necessarily say RT is a priority as much as others. For me, C is a higher need than RT. I think RT has options. We have nothing IMHO for C.

i guess when i prioritise needs ill put them in these tiers:

Primary: OT, DT, EDGE, CB
Secondary: S, LB, RB, (C?)
Tertiary: TE, IOL, (FB?)
Not Needs: WR, QB

that's not to say that i wouldnt mind a WR if they're great value especially on day 3 (or even another QB to add to the backup QB competition)
 

Deebo813

Hall of Famer
With all these picks we have, i hope we can possibly find a way to move back up in late 1st or early 2nd if able.
 

Michael M.

Pro Bowler
Yeah, I've gone back and forth on it but you take best available TBH and don't look back then address needs in the 2nd & 3rd for starters. We need a CB/S, DL, Edge, OL. The good thing is we do always address needs in FA then use Draft to compensate for misses. I'm sure we will be fine by Draft night in this regard. I think our CBs are actually solid in Humphrey, Peters, Young. The question is depth behind them and the rushers in front of them. Getting a 4-man rush is critical as is stopping the run to help the LBs. It's why I have DL as a higher need than secondary even if I think we need more playmakers and usually that's in the secondary. No doubt the offense needs a better OL to impact Lamar, JK & Gus, WRs & TEs. Our FO has their work cut out for them.


True but I wouldn't necessarily say RT is a priority as much as others. For me, C is a higher need than RT. I think RT has options. We have nothing IMHO for C.
I think we need both an RT and a center. And that's assuming Stanley returns. I know the Ravens haven't had much of a pass rush lately but apparently a lot of other teams do.
 

allblackraven

Hall of Famer
yeah that's dumb
i 100% think we should keep peters
and i also would have no problem drafting a 1st round corner even if we do keep him

part of the problem with some mocks is that they often have to justify why a pick is made with needs etc. when sometimes it really is as simple as... this guy's really good and this team would like to have him
Yeah, I tend to think it should always be the case with 1st round, maybe 2nd, too if the draft has that many good players.
 

RaineV1

Ravens Ring of Honor
i guess when i prioritise needs ill put them in these tiers:

Primary: OT, DT, EDGE, CB
Secondary: S, LB, RB, (C?)
Tertiary: TE, IOL, (FB?)
Not Needs: WR, QB

that's not to say that i wouldnt mind a WR if they're great value especially on day 3 (or even another QB to add to the backup QB competition)
Personally I would switch edge and LB. With Oweh and Bowser we at least have a pair of higher end starters. Could definitely use some depth and rotational pieces, but we have starters.

For ILB we have Queen and that's about it. Fort is in his thirties and coming off a season ending injury. Bynes is a higher end backup and has stepped up before, but he's also up there in age and shouldn't be a clear cut starter.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
Personally I would switch edge and LB. With Oweh and Bowser we at least have a pair of higher end starters. Could definitely use some depth and rotational pieces, but we have starters.

For ILB we have Queen and that's about it. Fort is in his thirties and coming off a season ending injury. Bynes is a higher end backup and has stepped up before, but he's also up there in age and shouldn't be a clear cut starter.

i think we've seen that it's easier to find workable ILB play for cheap than it is to find pass rushers
also worth pointing out that EDGEs are more likely to play rotationally and that we often put 3 (or more) on the field at the same time anyway - and also that Bowser just tore his achilles and there's no guarantee he's ready to go week 1 which would leave us with Oweh, Ferguson and Hayes right now before any vet additions

i just think we've got more options to find good LB play pre-draft than we do to find good EDGE play
 

Grim

Ravens Ring of Honor
Agree with everything you said on OL, except C I have a small change. I see Trystan Colon as the backup center and he's performed well in his limited chances. Yeah, with defense it's so many players that need to be retooled on the front seven and all at the same time. Makes it very difficult but getting younger will help long term. We have all seen this coming for a long time.
Oh yeah I forgot about him. Sure, but he’s one guy and definitely can’t go in there with just him.

i guess when i prioritise needs ill put them in these tiers:

Primary: OT, DT, EDGE, CB
Secondary: S, LB, RB, (C?)
Tertiary: TE, IOL, (FB?)
Not Needs: WR, QB

that's not to say that i wouldnt mind a WR if they're great value especially on day 3 (or even another QB to add to the backup QB competition)
Only disagreements I have here is OT, IOL. OT is a need but is it primary? It could very well be, yes. I think it depends on a lot of ifs, so I can see it but I also don’t know if IOL is tertiary by that logic. IOL has some major question marks too along with C.

I think we need both an RT and a center. And that's assuming Stanley returns. I know the Ravens haven't had much of a pass rush lately but apparently a lot of other teams do.
We could use a better option at RT but it’s not a major need IMHO. That doesn’t mean don’t take one high if Stanley looks good. Never a bad thing to stack the line. I just want elite players at whatever position they are.

Personally I would switch edge and LB. With Oweh and Bowser we at least have a pair of higher end starters. Could definitely use some depth and rotational pieces, but we have starters.

For ILB we have Queen and that's about it. Fort is in his thirties and coming off a season ending injury. Bynes is a higher end backup and has stepped up before, but he's also up there in age and shouldn't be a clear cut starter.
Yeah, lots of ILB can be found all over the Draft. In my opinion the 3rd has been a great round to get LB as well as the 2nd.
i think we've seen that it's easier to find workable ILB play for cheap than it is to find pass rushers
also worth pointing out that EDGEs are more likely to play rotationally and that we often put 3 (or more) on the field at the same time anyway - and also that Bowser just tore his achilles and there's no guarantee he's ready to go week 1 which would leave us with Oweh, Ferguson and Hayes right now before any vet additions

i just think we've got more options to find good LB play pre-draft than we do to find good EDGE play
I’m very worried about Edge. It could be why we haven’t had tons of turnovers and why the secondary was so bad.
 

Simba

Staff Member
Moderator
I know he’s “older” but if you told me my choices were Jensen and Bozeman for $10M a year, I’m going all out to bring Jensen back.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
Only disagreements I have here is OT, IOL. OT is a need but is it primary? It could very well be, yes. I think it depends on a lot of ifs, so I can see it but I also don’t know if IOL is tertiary by that logic. IOL has some major question marks too along with C.

part of how im assessing need there is about the inherent values of the position but also looking beyond just 1 year

OT is probably the 2nd most valuable position in the sport and we have a bunch of question-marks in the short term with health and depth but also beyond that our ideal starter at RT is only contracted to be here for a year anyway

IOL on the other hand has a ton of depth across the positions - and i put C? between the 2 just because it partially depends on what happens with bozeman... but IOL in general is full of NFL quality players - we might not love all of them as starters or full-time starters but there's a bunch of experience and youth and talent in that group that makes it a much lower priority

and just to be clear im not saying that if there's a great IOL who's BPA that we should pass them over for something I think we need more - just handicapping what i think we need to prioritise need-wise
 
Top