PurpleFlock - Ravens Message Board

“Note to Mod: Since you don't want to deal with your buddies continuing to run their mouths because you are their ‘yes’ man, don't cry to me about letting it drop. Both Bmore and Tru came back running their yaps after your request and you did nothing.”

It’s self-addressed to a moderator, of which there are only three: Myself, 29BmoreBird22 and RavensMania. It specifically name-checks 29BmoreBird22 in third person within the same sentence that outlines, “your request,” following with, “and you did nothing.” By the sheer process of elimination, the statement could only apply to either me or RavensMania.

It is plainly aimed at the RavensMania given the specific mention of his request that has been used to begin the timeline in question. The entire sentiment harshly chastises the moderator for bias and abuse of power. Then comments are made on RavensMania’s profile about an alleged power trip.

In a literal sense, there could not have been another target of the mud-slinging, whom wasn't aware or involved in the aftermath. Perhaps the initial mistake was clarified by my previous posts, perhaps it was a later self-realization.

What is known, however, is that you deliberately called out a specific moderator multiple times in a sentiment that could not have been more inaccurate. Attempting to repaint it as a misunderstanding on our end is absolutely dreadful.

It is not a bold and brazen untruth. Yes it was HIS request that was being referenced but the mention of bias was not intended for him. I had originally posted in more detail but did not realize there was a character limit. Got the 420 error message.

I then shortened it. So I wasn't blaming you for misunderstanding that statement. I believe I even stated I wasn't clear about that. That was due to shortening the message to meet the character limit.

But if we're being bold. Let me be bold. And the thread remains so you can check everything I am about to put down. BMore got salty cuz he claimed he did not make a statement he did make. Once I quoted it, he then tried to claim figure of speech. No there is no figure of speech in perhaps if flacco's hit was less we could afford a receiver.

he then tried to say he was the one who brought up spending more on cap on offense. Nope. You can see Tru did. Both wanted to argue this point, THEY DID. I even quoted their posts and proved the point and they still wanted to argue that point. You'll see at the end of my posts...

I repeatedly ended with the point and/or question about not drafting a receiver above round 3 more than twice in 9 years & once not being until 2015. Neither addressed it - just kept going on about they were right when it was there in black and white they were wrong.

Claiming semantics and knowing what they were thinking. What? No one can know what you're thinking -only what you post. Then Ravensmania asked to end the convo. I was typing and posted before I saw that. I said nothing further even though BMore had 5 offhanded comments regarding that convo where he had to state how right he was. Or sorry, how wrong someone else was.

six hours later Tru posts a comment which is fairly insulting as well. I left it. For over 5 hours. It remained even though it was in voilation of a mod request. I then answered it and I already stated removing that comment was fine. Just more effing SPIN and IGNORING the point. So here it is nice and bold and direct.

if only my comment was offending and disrespectful why was the gut reaction upon reading the thread and that comment for an admin to issue me a personal apology that was completely unsolicited? That comment should have been removed. You know it. BMore knows it. Only one reason it wasn't.

One comment met that criteria of disrespect that I made. . The other comment I made was removed because I called out the BS. No other reason. But one comment remains that meets that criteria. And it isn't a post I made.

The only reason this done on RavensMania profile 1. it was his request that was ignored. 2. Couldn't find the private convo button thingy when I went to do it. 3. Yep did not have the patience to play around to attempt to locate it either at that time.

Easy fix that should have been handled the right way in the first place and the great resistance to do so speaks volumes.

Said Admin doesn't actually feel sorry for you anymore after all this. He actually felt bad until you pulled this entire fiasco instead of leaving it alone. But since you have a bad memory and want to continue this, here we go.

It was a figure of speech. We can't afford to spend on the offense is not literally true. The Ravens have cap they can afford to spend every single year. As I said, it jus isn't the wisest allocation of resources when the offense hasn't shown that investments often make a significant difference.

I'm so hungry I could eat a horse.

I'm not literally going to eat a horse. Just really hungry. See how that works?

Here's me actually bringing up investments in the offense via FA. Sure, I didn't say "cap hits" exactly, but I mentioned the money being spent. Again, this is the issue with semantics that caused me to cut it short. https://imgur.com/a/UJHuq