Search results

I mean winning a lawsuit means I am not going to hold it against him as that is what it means to win. If the biggest vice people have on the guy is that he likes to have sex then I think we are trying too hard to make him into something he is not.

Yes but this falls into the same trap that bad teams do in that they just try and copy what the last team to win had. Saying "oh well these teams arent good at it so we dont need to be good at it" is how the bad organizations are run. The way to win in the NFL has always been the same: get...

Are we really going to call into attention the Ravens ability to evaluate WRs? Its not a very pretty picture. I would trust most other teams and their evaluations before I went with the Ravens. Its also unrelated as Tate was considered that guy by just about everyone to the point where the...

I also dont put a ton of stock in rookies but I do assume that a highly rated top 5 pick considered the best prospect at his position will be better than one of the worst number 2s in the league. In the same vein I also assume Vega (and Simpson who will be playing RG) will be better than both...

For most teams he is their number 3. Even your list of teams you think dont have better I would disagree heavily with several. Just as an example I would easily take both the Titans top 2 WRs over Bateman and its not close. Im going to just assume you forgot that they drafted Tate, who I would...

That’s because you are drastically overrating Bateman. I am generous by saying if you look at every teams roster he would be in the bottom 1/3 for a WR2. WR3 is a giant game of “well maybe him” but that part isn’t that unusual. Most teams have a Bateman. That guy who can make a couple plays...

I did not say there was a guy available. Only that they are a guy short of being an average WR room.

Given that the Patriots will be trading for AJ Brown I would take their WR room. The Broncos and Bills both have dramatically better OLInes so its not like they have nothing going on. On paper I would probably wager even the Patriots have a better OLine. I dont view the Chiefs and Steelers...

I would certainly say they are a guy short. They have a league average number 1, a below average 2, and are hoping someone can step up and become a 3 If they had a solid number 2 then they would be a good WR room but as it stands they are a guy short.

I always find it funny how OLine is referred as one thing when really this statement amounts to: if half the players on offense are good then paired with the 2x MVP QB they can be a top 10 unit.

My crazy self saw them call her Starlight and was like "she doesnt look like her at all... and I thought that was Erin Moriarty".

So the Browns are winning 4 games.

I mean they gave away a very easy first 6 games so by consequence the last 10 are going to be rough (I dont know what the Bengals will be).

That is a rough start. First game against the team that owns you and second game against possibly the most talented team in the NFL.

I mean TNF usually gets the 5th or 6th best game at best. Meanwhile the SNF game is 2 big market teams in a rivalry division game (that will get ratings) and the MNF game is the reigning Super Bowl champions against a lot of people's sexy pick to go to the Super Bowl next year with the QB...

We do not know if both G spots have been upgraded. We know one went from bad to mediocre and the other is a 1st round rookie. Maybe he is good. Maybe he is no better than what existed last season and is bottom 5. He has 0 NFL snaps so I am not willing to say one way or the other. I do know...

I mean I think its bold to say the OLine will be better because they signed a mediocre starter and drafted a rookie but lost a top 5 C. If the OLine is as good as last year that will exceed expectations.

He has played 5 full NFL seasons and is entering year 6. Its past the point where "flashes" are okay. Either he has it or he doesn't and if its the latter its time to move on.

Having a deal and someone backing off is a different kettle of fish then the coach pushing for a particular player instead (though I would have taken Bain). Though considering the Ravens pick and the next 2 were the players they seemingly wanted... its probably for the best they did not make...

Wasn't he the guy completely insufferable in interviews both with teams and the public or am I thinking of another guy?