Search results

this could be a really good pairing!

That whole "Who's better than..." schtick is like 30 years old. Started way back in late 1990's WCW wrestling with Chris Kanyon. It was hilarious. "Who's better than Kanyon?!" and the fans would yell "Everybody!" "No, no, no! The answer is NOBODY! Nobody's better than Kanyon!" Went on...

I was thinking that this was not something the organization was really ready for this year and that they might make a temporary decision for a stop-gap until they happened upon a McDonald kind of guy again. But I'm starting to think that they might have had a guy and that they've been slow...

I completely agree with the 5 points. But, like you say, if we can get that from an OC, that might have additional benefit. Plus, I feel like there are DC's that might not be as attractive as HC's when there are DC's interviewing that have already done it and might be more attractive than...

This is why I'm not certain it matters which side of the ball we hire as HC. I just think we need to hire what we think is the best. I continue to err on OC as HC, because I think Kubiak - who's my final choice - as an OC as HC is the best decision. If they go with a DC as HC then McDaniel is...

I hope the guy with the power unites these two.

Such a good game. Lots of great plays and tons of mistakes.

Love it. I'm just reading it like it's so simple to do what they're doing with Mike barking it our and with where we are it's funny to imagine the avatar talking in that way. hahaha

I can't lie... I hate Mike McDonald (@JO_75 ) is commentating this thread. It hurts my heart. It's like he's telling us why he's the man and the old guy wasn't at that stage. LOL. Does anyone else look at avatars an imagine those are the guys talking? hahahaha

This game might show us why Sean Payton would have been a bargain for a first round pick...

I think I might like Stefanski and Kubiak the most. McDaniels is 3rd. That video after the Jets loss just hit me wrong. I find myself asking, "Bro, WTF are you talking about?!" :) Since any DC will be an upgrade from Orr I can't say that I have a favorite from the ones in the hunt for HCing...

I thought the players were giving those, "WTF is this crazy person even saying?" look.

How long they gonna give Lamar with a new contact and HC before they ship him out? ...if he doesn't win a SB. Because that's what this is all about.

Just wait til the Giants' JH says, "I have to have _____!" The guy we wanna pick as HC. "I really need him as my go to ___!" Fill in OC or DC as you desire. After years of not picking coaches that could replace him.

So this is why all of this is so captivating. I like Stefanski and McDaniel and would prefer an OC as HC - I think. But! If Minter is HC, would one of those two settle to be OC here? And how long would they stay? Conversely, could we hire either Stefanski or McDaniel and still get Minter as...

No other team has Lamar Jackson. Simple As that, I think. ;)

I'd be kind of surprised if any of the guys on the shorter second interview list of ours makes a decision before we hire someone. I still think we have the cherry job out there.

Don't know about a HC wearing Capri pants, tho.

I'm not saying that he isn't impactful in those situations that you point out, I get it. I agree that he's great and he does everything he's asked to do well, even exceptional. I'm just sticking to that's his versatility in a poorly manned DEF. Would he still be asked to do occasionally what...

Just because he can play in the middle, doesn't mean he should. He's better in the back. edit--- his versatility demands in our DEF that he be out of his primary, most impactful position.