Search results

Easy fix that should have been handled the right way in the first place and the great resistance to do so speaks volumes.

The only reason this done on RavensMania profile 1. it was his request that was ignored. 2. Couldn't find the private convo button thingy when I went to do it. 3. Yep did not have the patience to play around to attempt to locate it either at that time.

One comment met that criteria of disrespect that I made. . The other comment I made was removed because I called out the BS. No other reason. But one comment remains that meets that criteria. And it isn't a post I made.

if only my comment was offending and disrespectful why was the gut reaction upon reading the thread and that comment for an admin to issue me a personal apology that was completely unsolicited? That comment should have been removed. You know it. BMore knows it. Only one reason it wasn't.

six hours later Tru posts a comment which is fairly insulting as well. I left it. For over 5 hours. It remained even though it was in voilation of a mod request. I then answered it and I already stated removing that comment was fine. Just more effing SPIN and IGNORING the point. So here it is...

Claiming semantics and knowing what they were thinking. What? No one can know what you're thinking -only what you post. Then Ravensmania asked to end the convo. I was typing and posted before I saw that. I said nothing further even though BMore had 5 offhanded comments regarding that convo where...

I repeatedly ended with the point and/or question about not drafting a receiver above round 3 more than twice in 9 years & once not being until 2015. Neither addressed it - just kept going on about they were right when it was there in black and white they were wrong.

he then tried to say he was the one who brought up spending more on cap on offense. Nope. You can see Tru did. Both wanted to argue this point, THEY DID. I even quoted their posts and proved the point and they still wanted to argue that point. You'll see at the end of my posts...

But if we're being bold. Let me be bold. And the thread remains so you can check everything I am about to put down. BMore got salty cuz he claimed he did not make a statement he did make. Once I quoted it, he then tried to claim figure of speech. No there is no figure of speech in perhaps if...

I then shortened it. So I wasn't blaming you for misunderstanding that statement. I believe I even stated I wasn't clear about that. That was due to shortening the message to meet the character limit.

It is not a bold and brazen untruth. Yes it was HIS request that was being referenced but the mention of bias was not intended for him. I had originally posted in more detail but did not realize there was a character limit. Got the 420 error message.

But keep up the spin all you like. I don't believe I have requested that my comment be restored have I? Nor did I request the warnings to be removed. I only requested that similar things be dealt with in the same fashion. That is all.

You understand that someone reading through the thread found the comment you DID leave up so disturbing they issued a personal apology right? Which was the point. Doesn't matter, I've gleaned all the info I need from the interactions. I only responded because Truth had made it about RavensMania...

Just to be clear as well, my comment that posted 4 mins after RavensMania's request I expected might be deleted once I hit post and saw the request. I would have been fine with that too as long as subsequent comments were deleted as well.

My response to it was nearly 5 hours (or over 5 hours) later. So perhaps if the comment that initiated my "flaming" was handled in the proper manner, none of it happens. I don't really take issue with the removal of my response to that comment to be honest. But what you should be asking...

Nope that is where you are wrong. The comment that someone else read and felt some need to apologize to me, when I had not reached out to them at all, is the one I responded to. I left it up there for hours to see if it would be removed since it was a full 6 hours after the mod request to stop...

Just to be clear regarding that comment by Tru that was allowed to remain, an admin reading the thread was so upset by its tone he issued me an unsolicited personal apology. And that is where the bias comes into play. I hope I have helped clear that up.

As for RavensMania, it was his request to stop that was ignored. The bias was not by him, just to be clear because apparently I was not clear. That the post that came 6 hours later remains is the issue. As well as the offhanded comments (of which there are many) made to others declaring how...

No sorry. I responded to Tru's one post 4 mins after RavensMania's request to stop because I had not seen the request. I was typing. Tru then posted a response to my post 6 hours later and no, it was not an offhanded comment. That post remains up there and the timestamp is on it. Then he posted...