It's due to Averett having shown promise. Canady had 4 years and has not risen above the below-average level.Can you give some insight into the reason behind cutting Canady over Averett. Is it due to him having two more years on his rookie deal?
I'm pretty sure that's the reason as well, but put it in the #mailbag thread just incase @Filmstudy has some insight that we as fans don't have.It's due to Averett having shown promise. Canady had 4 years and has not risen above the below-average level.
Can you give some insight into the reason behind cutting Canady over Averett. Is it due to him having two more years on his rookie deal?
Not sure about Mack but as far as run D goes, I'm more comfortable with Pierce missing than BW.If Pierce were to miss time (Harbaugh says he's day to day right now) has this defence shown any evidence it can stop the run without both Williams and Pierce available? Is Daylon Mack a potential answer given his body-type or does he have all the hallmarks of a red-shirt type player?
according the filmstudyravens defensive notes, we ran 3-3-5 Nickel in an attempt to slow down the Bengals running game. We did this on 12 plays and the Bengals had 38 yards or 3.2 ypp, including 13 yards on 8 runs or 1.6 ypc.If Pierce were to miss time (Harbaugh says he's day to day right now) has this defence shown any evidence it can stop the run without both Williams and Pierce available? Is Daylon Mack a potential answer given his body-type or does he have all the hallmarks of a red-shirt type player?
I would think the better question would be why cut Canady over Cyrus Jones, especially when it was done just days after Jones muffing a punt in a critical game. Cyrus was a healthy scratch this week, and seemingly has been replaced as the primary punt returner. He's made essentially no contribution on defense this year.Can you give some insight into the reason behind cutting Canady over Averett. Is it due to him having two more years on his rookie deal?
Short podcast proposal:
Sometimes, Ken or Ken's guests refer to a "win probability model." How is such a thing constructed? What factors (variables) contribute to such a model? What factors are typically left out? Are there competing schools of thought about the best way to build such a model for gridiron football - as opposed to other game-theoretical behaviors?
Here is a question for the mailbag and I'm not sure if it would need to be a short or just a question answered on one of your podcasts or as a post on PF, but many of us are concerned that we may lose Greg Roman at the end of the year. Now I have mentioned that I don't feel LJ needs a particular system to succeed, but it certainly would be great to have GRo around for a few years. That being said, he's been too good to not get looks from other teams.
Who would be the coach that would most likely get the not to become offensive coordinator. We would promote from within the likes of David Culley or maybe even James Urban or would be go outside the organization. Obviously these will all be opinions, but we'd love to have your thoughts on this subject.
Hello Filmstudy Podcast! I would describe myself as a passionate ravens fan, but only having a basic understanding of personnel, scheme, alignment, etc.
That said, I feel like I am watching the games at a slightly higher level, just from listening and reading you content.
To that end. Could you talk a little bit about the process that you put into Film Study? How you approach attending games, what you are watching for, the resources you use to score games, and the hours you put into that?
When watching on Sundays, I sometimes try to do the "NFL Matchup" show formulah to each play, where I'm looking at personel packages, alignment, and concepts, but its pretty challenging with all the subbing and deciphering between Tackles and Tight Ends, and exhausting and then I usually just giving up and watching the ball for the rest of the game (LOL).
Maybe there is "getting started" checklist or tips and tricks you would give someone to watch at a slightly higher level ?
Thanks Love the Show and appreciate all the work you put into it.
and Welcome to PurpleFlock!Hello Filmstudy Podcast! I would describe myself as a passionate ravens fan, but only having a basic understanding of personnel, scheme, alignment, etc.
That said, I feel like I am watching the games at a slightly higher level, just from listening and reading you content.
To that end. Could you talk a little bit about the process that you put into Film Study? How you approach attending games, what you are watching for, the resources you use to score games, and the hours you put into that?
When watching on Sundays, I sometimes try to do the "NFL Matchup" show formulah to each play, where I'm looking at personel packages, alignment, and concepts, but its pretty challenging with all the subbing and deciphering between Tackles and Tight Ends, and exhausting and then I usually just giving up and watching the ball for the rest of the game (LOL).
Maybe there is "getting started" checklist or tips and tricks you would give someone to watch at a slightly higher level ?
Thanks Love the Show and appreciate all the work you put into it.