• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

2026 NFL Draft General Discussion

What would you say if EDC did something like

Spencer Fano
Chris Bell
Oscar Delp

I'm just looking at this draft and I'm thoroughly unenthused. I feel like it is very likely we get something of this caliber even if every one of those is wrong

not sure about fano anymore - just think he's less safe than some other options and the ceiling isn't as high as other options either

but bell and delp in R2 and R3 would be decent returns - certainly high-upside plays on skillsets we could use
 
I feel like Jordyn Tyson is gonna be the pick. I think Ioane and Fano go before we pick, I’m buying the doubts on McCoys knee, I’m not buying that Reuben Bain falls.

I’m not big on Jordyn Tyson, but I think at 14 Eric is looking for an “impact” player and a guy who’s more exciting than anyone we’d find later in the first where we usually pick. I don’t like his injury history and I don’t think he’s good enough on film to overlook that, but apparently the consensus feels different.

Wouldn’t be entirely shocked if it ends up being Caleb downs or Sonny styles, could see one of them falling due to positional value, there’s gonna be a lot of guys going before us that wouldn’t typically go that high due to positional value and you gotta think one or two teams go against that grain this year and stick to positional value, and I don’t think fano or Vega are the ones that fall because OL play is so bad. You got a RB, a G, a short armed tackle, a safety, an off-ball LB, a hybrid LB, and 2 slot receivers, and I wouldn’t be shocked if the only one that slips to 14 is the off ball LB or the safety.

i just cant personally find the home ahead of us for Vega - i'm not sure which team above us is taking him

I have Tyson as WR3 now, i've come around on Tate (who won't be there) but i've also got KC Concepcion ahead of him too now (albeit it's close) - Concepcion and Tyson just have the skillsets that mesh so well with Lamar's style and preference - outside slasher types vs vertical "x" receivers

i'm also perturbed by the McCoy injury reports - i'm not going to adjust my stack because i can't really know about any of the medical stuff - but it definitely changes how i think about pick 14
 
Tyson has been someone I have had some interest in since the beginning but I just recently had a thought… is Tyson a slightly bigger version of Bateman? I loved Bateman coming out too.

the way i would put it is that their role would be similar in terms of potential usage and alignment in a hypothetical ravens offence
but Tyson's a superior prospect - he's bigger, better ball skills, better in contested situations, probably a looser and more explosive athlete as well (although bateman's ankle flexion is ridiculous and had the 4.39 speed) - bate was definitely the more refined route runner and definitely has more chops winning vs press coming out

obviously tyson's injury is concerning - his workout tomorrow will be watched with great interest

there's a lot of smoke that he won't even be available at 14 - Chiefs and Rams have frequently been mocked as landing spots for him
 
From what I’ve seen, he reminds me a bit of aj brown, he’s not as big and is quicker than brown but I think the long, physical, still good at YAC because they’re not big lumbering runners, means they offer similar skill sets.

Dare i say jamarr chase lite, like nowhere near the pure talent level but Tyson offers a milder version of the chase skillset. And when I say nowhere near the same caliber I mean it, and also he comes with an injury risk.

If we were picking in the 20s I think I’d be all over the idea of Tyson but I feel like at 14 it’s pretty meh

i think the guy tyson reminds me of (if i had to comp him to anyone) is amari cooper
 
not sure about fano anymore - just think he's less safe than some other options and the ceiling isn't as high as other options either

but bell and delp in R2 and R3 would be decent returns - certainly high-upside plays on skillsets we could use
I GLANCED at some OGs. As in I spent like 15 total minutes looking at Fano, Iaone, and Pregnon. I liked what I saw out of all 3 but the Penn State kid was the one who popped to me. But I dont know what I'm talking about for OL. Seemed like consensus was Fano for OG.
 
I GLANCED at some OGs. As in I spent like 15 total minutes looking at Fano, Iaone, and Pregnon. I liked what I saw out of all 3 but the Penn State kid was the one who popped to me. But I dont know what I'm talking about for OL. Seemed like consensus was Fano for OG.
Honestly the one that pops for me more than any of them is pregnon, but I have a hard time going so hard against the consensus so I just assume I’m missing something. I think he’s probably got the highest ceiling of them all. Think he’s the most physically dominant of them all, and athletically he’s somewhere in the middle, doesn’t move quite like Fano but he’s better at blocking in space than Vega. Vega as a pass protector though is about as good as you’re gonna see, pretty spotless film there.
 
I GLANCED at some OGs. As in I spent like 15 total minutes looking at Fano, Iaone, and Pregnon. I liked what I saw out of all 3 but the Penn State kid was the one who popped to me. But I dont know what I'm talking about for OL. Seemed like consensus was Fano for OG.

i love the movement skills for Fano but projecting his play-strength inside to guard feels tougher - there's a reason some people are projecting him to C (but i'm not drafting a projected C conversion 14th overall or anywhere near the top 25 if that's what we're doing)

Fano's on my board as a OT, whereas Mauigoa and Proctor are both guys i'm projecting as better at Guard as conversions from OT based on their skillset

Ioane is my OL2 behind Mauigoa - he projects as a solid impact player straight away - i'm not convinced the ceiling is the all-pro that i've seen some analysts project him as and i do think he's a better fit in a gap scheme vs the inside-zone stuff i'd project our offence to feature heavily in 2026 but it's not enough to drop him down the board significantly... Ioane is hovering around 12th in my stack

i love pregnon, even if i understand there are flaws in his profile and he's an older prospect - pregnon's highlights are certainly the highest in the G class

i really like Bisontis as well, he's my OG3 and i have him stacked around a clump of other OL guys but currently he's OL5 on my board (behind Mauigoa, Ioane, Fano and Freeling) but i've got him clustered with Proctor, Miller and Iheanachor and i definitely have been flipping around that order a bit

then i've got Pregnon in a tier below those guys with Lomu and my pet cat in this class Billy Schrauth (i'm way higher than consensus on Schrauth)

i know that some people have Keylan Rutledge in that tier of guys as well - but that's too rich for me - to me he's too stiff and segmented of a mover but i know some people love him and especially his run-blocking

in that Rutledge tier, that's where i've got that group of 5/6 C prospects

once you get below that, then i start running out of day 2 grades with only a few guys left who sneak in the top 100ish

beyond those anyone taken after wouldn't be guys i'd necessarily project as factoring into the 2026 starting OL ahead of Jones or Bullock

i've seen support for Caleb Tiernan, Austin Barber, Markel Bell, Travis Burke (all OTs) and Gennings Dunker (RT to G conversion) as day 2 guys as well but not for me - they're more day 3 type guys for me
 
That’s a really good comp.

just the way they dance and explode with their movement skills but not in a refined controlled way
like their best 10-20 routes look insane, but that sometimes the way they ran routes with their movement skills and lack of pacing throw off timing windows

on the plus side, it's something you can work on

on the negative side, amari cooper didnt grow that way (but i've heard Nate Tice talk about the fact that part of that was stubbornness on Cooper's part when he was coaching him)
 
Honestly the one that pops for me more than any of them is pregnon, but I have a hard time going so hard against the consensus so I just assume I’m missing something. I think he’s probably got the highest ceiling of them all. Think he’s the most physically dominant of them all, and athletically he’s somewhere in the middle, doesn’t move quite like Fano but he’s better at blocking in space than Vega. Vega as a pass protector though is about as good as you’re gonna see, pretty spotless film there.

i really love pregnon but i think when i was also really high on him earlier in the process it was because i was grading the flashes and he's definitely a less consistent prospect than vega for sure

i think he's a more explosively powerful guy in the run game than Vega, i think he's better laterally when projecting him to a zone blocking scheme, he's longer too although i dont think he uses his arm length or his punch as effectively as he should

he's a toolsy guy who would be a dream pick at 45
 
i love the movement skills for Fano but projecting his play-strength inside to guard feels tougher - there's a reason some people are projecting him to C (but i'm not drafting a projected C conversion 14th overall or anywhere near the top 25 if that's what we're doing)

Fano's on my board as a OT, whereas Mauigoa and Proctor are both guys i'm projecting as better at Guard as conversions from OT based on their skillset

Ioane is my OL2 behind Mauigoa - he projects as a solid impact player straight away - i'm not convinced the ceiling is the all-pro that i've seen some analysts project him as and i do think he's a better fit in a gap scheme vs the inside-zone stuff i'd project our offence to feature heavily in 2026 but it's not enough to drop him down the board significantly... Ioane is hovering around 12th in my stack

i love pregnon, even if i understand there are flaws in his profile and he's an older prospect - pregnon's highlights are certainly the highest in the G class

i really like Bisontis as well, he's my OG3 and i have him stacked around a clump of other OL guys but currently he's OL5 on my board (behind Mauigoa, Ioane, Fano and Freeling) but i've got him clustered with Proctor, Miller and Iheanachor and i definitely have been flipping around that order a bit

then i've got Pregnon in a tier below those guys with Lomu and my pet cat in this class Billy Schrauth (i'm way higher than consensus on Schrauth)

i know that some people have Keylan Rutledge in that tier of guys as well - but that's too rich for me - to me he's too stiff and segmented of a mover but i know some people love him and especially his run-blocking

in that Rutledge tier, that's where i've got that group of 5/6 C prospects

once you get below that, then i start running out of day 2 grades with only a few guys left who sneak in the top 100ish

beyond those anyone taken after wouldn't be guys i'd necessarily project as factoring into the 2026 starting OL ahead of Jones or Bullock

i've seen support for Caleb Tiernan, Austin Barber, Markel Bell, Travis Burke (all OTs) and Gennings Dunker (RT to G conversion) as day 2 guys as well but not for me - they're more day 3 type guys for me
Thank you!!!! Do you worry about EDCs ability to draft iOL? Outside of Linderbaum, I can't remember the last good iOL player we've drafted. We definitely haven't selected those picks high in recent times and that may just be it. But even Joe D wasn't developing these guys and if he was it like 4 to 5 years into their careers.
 
Mark Ingram is announcing our day 2 picks <3
 
Get ready…

IMG_8841.jpeg
 
Thank you!!!! Do you worry about EDCs ability to draft iOL? Outside of Linderbaum, I can't remember the last good iOL player we've drafted. We definitely haven't selected those picks high in recent times and that may just be it. But even Joe D wasn't developing these guys and if he was it like 4 to 5 years into their careers.

not concerned at all

i think the pipeline feels dry because we've actually seen what 1 of the backups already looks like as a starter (vorhees)
but looking at 2026 we basically already know 7 of the 9/10 OL who are making the roster

i dont typically like to separate Harbs and EDC in terms of drafting trends because it's a collaboration, but i will say that Harbs clearly has a taste in OL and we know from the guys drafted as "Harbs" guys, the kinds of guys he was vouching for - and i'll say that we've found a lot of successful OL prospects outside of the archetype that we were drafting late 3rd/early 4th that Harbs was clearly advocating hard for

in terms of actually drafting good IOL day 2 prospects - i think we've been as much a victim of our draft slot as much as anything - drafting later has meant we've missed out on the end of the OL run in R3 the last 2-3 years
 
Top