I guess that depends on the expectations. They clearly did not solve C but what else did we expect them to do beyond that? They were never going to come in and take 3 OL.
Literally the first 2 picks were trenches players but OK
and this could really be intriguing.The more we pick guys, the more it feels like I have no idea what they want to do, and maybe that's a good thing. Feel like retrospectively, I may have been stuck in my ways on how the Ravens have always done thing. Like the players or not, this feels like a real departure and a jump into something really new.
Addressed the complete lack of competent pass rushing DT options in this class aboveGee. A DT in case Mads isn't the same player or gets hurt again? Depth on the line?
Addressed the complete lack of competent pass rushing DT options in this class above
I’m all for additional OL depth but where do they fit? We’ve already got 7 iOL options. And 3 Ts.
We got a guy in the first round.Stark departure? They have neglected trenches for years and mostly did it yet again here.
And what do you think the guys that are going now are going to be? Most of these dudes are going to be out of the league in 2 yearsWe have UPS truck drivers and Save A Lot cashiers
We got a guy in the first round.
really hoping Kone is ok from last years bad injuryVery unRavenslike draft this. 2 WRs, 2TEs, 1 RB and, most surprising of all, only 1 DB from 8 picks.
Brother, You buy them books and send them to school but unfortunately they just eat the covers off the books……lol!Zion is a pass rusher
I guess that depends on the expectations. They clearly did not solve C but what else did we expect them to do beyond that? They were never going to come in and take 3 OL.
Gee. A DT in case Mads isn't the same player or gets hurt again? Depth on the line?
which tbf is what they used to do on day 3
take 3 OL and see if 1 of them sticks
next year isn't supposed to be any better which is why the Bengals traded for Dexit's a terrible DT class
I’d definitely support it in a world where we don’t have depth needs across the entire roster. Feel like if we had picked 3 OL then we’d be calling the WR and TE rooms ass. Can’t win when you need to fill out a roster like this. Something has to sacrifice and it’s unfortunately the one where the talent they were eyeing went way too high.which tbf is what they used to do on day 3
take 3 OL and see if 1 of them sticks
I mean, that's your #1 draft pick, that's a pretty big investment.Literally one player lol
I’d definitely support it in a world where we don’t have depth needs across the entire roster. Feel like if we had picked 3 OL then we’d be calling the WR and TE rooms ass. Can’t win when you need to fill out a roster like this. Something has to sacrifice and it’s unfortunately the one where the talent they were eyeing went way too high.