JAAM
Hall of Famer
Zesty af but I wouldn’t mind Lemon lol
Zesty af but I wouldn’t mind Lemon lol
We lost a ton of players that had substantial roles on the team and weren't able to replace many of them.This draft is so weird because the roster has more holes than it has typically had in the last 4 or 5 years. In my opinion. And some of those holes are hard, like C which isn't as straightforward as other OL spots. Then it's a really bad top end talent year. Feels like a lot of limbo to me.
Needs between draft and FA
C
OG
WR
TE
TE again
RB
DL
EDGE
ILB
CB
S
Me likeyI say our first two picks are Rueben Bain Jr., and Keylan Rutledge... I'm dying on that hill.
Show me the kenyon sadiq receiving highlight that isnt just him running in a straight line
Show me the kenyon sadiq block highlight that will translate to a NFL DL at 240lbs
if you draft this dude in the 1st round, he'd better be elite at something other than running in a straight line
Hi all, I found this site ahead of the draft. I thought this would be a fun place to hangout for the draft. I'm really excited.
I hope the Ravens don't pick Sadiq. I've seen people suggesting he'd basically be a bigger wide receiver, but if he were a wide receiver, he'd play that. He doesn't have the lateral agility or quickness and Oregon did a great job of just scheming him open and manufacturing touches. There's a reason he didn't do any agility drills at the combine. I will say that he's a really willing blocker, but he's maxed out size wise. He's never going to be a Rob Gronkowski no matter how hard he tries.
Probably an unpopular opinion, but I think Bain Jr. is a bit of a trap. I think he's got a lot to love in his profile and game, but there are some real risks. He's explosive, strong, and bendy and he is relentless. But, for as disruptive as he is, he doesn't close super well. I know people might also try to write off the arm length, but that's literally 1 percentile in the NFL. It'd be fairly unprecedented to see an edge have his measurables and make it work. He's the guy I wouldn't be surprised if he busted or was a 10+ sack guy. Great traits and motor, but also some real risk with him.
I see KC Concepcion is a popular name here and I don't like it. He's amazing against man coverage, but he has a pretty drastic drop off against zone. That's a tough pill to swallow when you know the league plays zone on 75% of snaps. Plus, having Lamar Jackson means teams want to play less man and not have their backs turned to him for fear of him running. I know people will say that his feel for zone can be taught, but we're talking about a three year college starter and someone who played football since he was five. I just don't think it's easy to teach or he'd have picked it up along the way. N'Keal Harry was a similar guy in college. Great against man, but saw a significant drop off against zone. The list of guys who have that profile isn't encouraging. Also, for being a guy who uncovers well from man coverage and is fast, he's surprisingly bad on deep balls. He has a ridiculously high covered rate deep and has a pretty horrendous deep ball conversion rate.
Overall, I'd really like a guard or center. I've seen it become a hot button issue over interior lineman and the fifth year option, but if you get an All Pro, ala Quentin Nelson, you're happy to pick that fifth year option up. Are any of these guys going to be an All Pro? I don't know. The draft class isn't amazing. But I don't think the fifth year option is a blanket reason to not draft an interior lineman.
This is the energy I need to have. I remember being pissed about the Lamar pick thinking we still had a small window to take advantage of with Flacco. I also remember feeling hyped about the idea of Perriman and watching his highlights for a straight week after the pick.I’m cool with whatever happens tonight. Can’t do nothing but trust the new coaching staff and their vision.
Understood! I like being surprised just like everyone else!Welcome bro! Just a heads up don’t post any spoilers in the draft chat or you’ll be blocked/suspended from the site. Enjoy!
The only thing Sadiq has is his athleticism. I do have a lot of concerns about him, especially at 14 but in 1st round alone. I can see what people would like in him, but I'm not in love with him as a prospect for us on Day 1. I'd take him on Day 2. But I also think generally the talent from 10-50 is about the same. This Draft is really kinda meh. I don't think it is 2013, but it is bad in its own way. Feels like the 2nd Round is VERY VERY long. and then we have a very long 3rd round and then we enter Day 3, which feels kinda flat talent-wise where everyone is kind of the same.
| GRADE | EXPECTED VOLUME | 2026 |
| Top 10 | 10 | 6 (in a typical year, i'd be hoping to get one of these guys at 14 |
| 1st Round | 20 | 12 |
| Late 1st/Early 2nd | 35 | 27 (in a typical year, i'd be hoping to get one of these guys at 45) |
| 2nd Round | 55 | 49 |
| Late 2nd/Early 3rd | 75 | 74 - we should expect one of these players at pick 80 most years (including this one) |
| 3rd Round | 100 | 103 |
| 4th Round | 130 | 147 |
| 5th Round | 160 | 175 |
| Draftable | 200 | 206 |
Come on, Rossie, I understand you don't like him, but the criticism is exaggerated.
21 years old, 6'3", 240 lbs, runs a 4.39 sprint, 10" hands, you can line him up along the line, he's versatile, good at screens and quick passes (short or medium range). What linebacker or safety can consistently withstand a freak like that? He has time to improve with training. It's not as bad to draft him as some people think
bad way. I should have clarified that......
We won’t hear from rossi for a while if we pick Sadiq
He better stick around and flip out like any self-respecting member of this group would.
1. Who told you that it tracks with every trade for the past 30 years? Is there any documentation that actually supports that? You do realize that there's no less than a half dozen trade value charts out there that "fans" reference, and every single one is different. Draftek has one. Walter football has one. Over the Cap has one. Which one is the gospel, so that I can show you what the draft trade value chart thinks is "fair value" vs what a team in real time actually paid.The arbitrary trade value chart that seems to roughly track with every trade for the past 30 years yes. Given that it seems to be the thing every single team has followed then you can basically gauge the value of each trade based on it and a 1st and a 2nd is an overpay so a 3rd would have to come back and then a few late round swaps to even out the value.
I think its bold to say the snap counts wont be affected. Trey will probably be in on every single passing down because of the gap in skill between him and the others. That means one less spot for them to rotate into. Therefore the snaps that came from that position that are going to him, he has to not only do that production, but then surpass it by 10 to get to 40 sacks which again is possible but difficult considering he is 2 years older and coming off an injury.
I am also fascinated that Hendrickson will make about 45m if you cut after 2 years and Bain is 4 years 30m so 15m less which to me is a safer bet. I would also mention, in the same vein as the previous paragraph, that if you stay at 14 you owe about 23m so you really are talking about 7m in additional risk over 4 years compared to Treys 45m. That is also ignoring that you could certainly find a trade partner for the last 2 years of that which would save about 17m out of the 30m. So in terms of financial commitment Trey is the far bigger risk. Now you are right that if Bain is bad then the draft pick value is lost but that is true of every single player you could pick. Of the names generally being mocked (I see the TE and G being the main ones) Bain is by far the player with the highest all pro potential the positional value is far higher. So its a higher value prospect, at a higher value position, at one of the Ravens 2 major needs.
Funnily enough I have seen a few pieces that show if your goal is to get starters you tend not to fair that well in the second round as most second round picks are "first round talent but..." which makes them more boom or bust. If you are looking for starters the 3rd is often a good place to look. They wont blow you away but they will be solid starters.
Just doing a stroll through the draft history and while I do think we end up better off when we draft players we "universally" love, it's not that disparate from the opposite.
Plenty of guys that we loved that ended up being dogs. Plenty of guys we loved that didn't do a thing.
Also plenty of guys we hated that ended up playing really well. And also plenty of guys we hated that were terrible.
Even externally, there are guys we've hated that we did not pick that have gone on to do great things elsewhere.
All of that is to say is, it doesn't look like there's any real correlation. Probably batting a little higher on the love/love side but I think we've just got to trust them, because they're right more often than they're wrong with the early picks.
Hurst and Queen were two picks I simply didn't understand (in the Lamar era).for sure, the missing context though is why people hated the pick
sometimes it's the player
and other times, it's because of who else was available that we passed on
in recent times, who do you think are the most hated at the time Ravens 1st round picks?
Marlon Humphrey?
Hayden Hurst?
Odafe Oweh?