Yea hell nah. 4th at bestI’m out for a second round pick. No
Would you do a 2nd for Barkley?I’m out for a second round pick. No
Would you do a 2nd for Barkley?
Name a 2nd or 3rd round pick that is a RB that will give us the same production as Henry or Jacobs. Our front office lives in the stone age... not saying we need to do what the Rams did but come on now.If there is any truth in this, by far the wildest part of it is a 2nd round pick.
GTFOH
No for the same reason. 10 game rental for a player who will leave. A 3rd if they pay most of his salary is a good deal for both sides.Would you do a 2nd for Barkley?
Name a 2nd or 3rd round pick that is a RB that will give us the same production as Henry or Jacobs. Our front office lives in the stone age... not saying we need to do what the Rams did but come on now.
Getting 3YPC… ya just about any 2nd or 3rd or UFA. RBs with mileage are not that valuable. CMac is more than a RB but he is 1 of 1 and his injuries ironically give him less mileage.Name a 2nd or 3rd round pick that is a RB that will give us the same production as Henry or Jacobs. Our front office lives in the stone age... not saying we need to do what the Rams did but come on now.
I'm not trading a 2nd for a guy with a 3.1 avg. I thought the idea was to get someone better than GusName a 2nd or 3rd round pick that is a RB that will give us the same production as Henry or Jacobs. Our front office lives in the stone age... not saying we need to do what the Rams did but come on now.
For this team, I'd cough up the 2nd and hope we get a 3rd comp back if a deal isn't reached. That's me though. And that's also if we're not going after an edge.No for the same reason. 10 game rental for a player who will leave. A 3rd if they pay most of his salary is a good deal for both sides.
Neither RB is going to get enough money to qualify for a 3rd comp (basically a high 4th). At best you are getting a 5th round comp for either, and that is a maybe.For this team, I'd cough up the 2nd and hope we get a 3rd comp back if a deal isn't reached. That's me though. And that's also if we're not going after an edge.
To his defense that offense is broken and their QB is terrible, he’d kill it with Lamar. But if this is a one year rental I don’t like it, considering he could get hurtI'm not trading a 2nd for a guy with a 3.1 avg. I thought the idea was to get someone better than Gus
Wouldn't both Henry and Jacobs, or even Saquon all be rentals? So what's the difference?To his defense that offense is broken and their QB is terrible, he’d kill it with Lamar. But if this is a one year rental I don’t like it, considering he could get hurt
That should lower the price, in my eyes at leastTo his defense that offense is broken and their QB is terrible, he’d kill it with Lamar. But if this is a one year rental I don’t like it, considering he could get hurt
He’d get hurt and we’d be a laughing stockAt this point I’m kind of Saquon/Burns or bust. Not really a fan of Jacobs