We don't know thatIf he catches it properly he doesn't fumble at all.
We don't know thatIf he catches it properly he doesn't fumble at all.
I'd rather he catch the ball and hang on, oddly enough.So you'd rather a catch-fumble...?
Yep. You could see him shaking his head, he knew it.
You try and catch that shit of a passIf he catches it properly he doesn't fumble at all.
Yeah, at least catch it and put it away. More drops and juggles than I thought possible.Still pissed at Boyle
Looked like he brought it in before it was knocked outBoyle couldn't do much more than he did, hard to secure that kind of short and low pass
We don't know that
We don't know that. I'm going with what defintiely happened.He fumbled because the ball wasn't secure, if it is secure he doesn't fumble
It's Dan Fouts. As long as Joe underthrew it he's happy. And if Joe doesn't underthrow it he can just say Joe underthrew it anyway.In my eyes, the Boyle reception was clearly incomplete. I'm unsure of how the announcer continued arguing in favor of a controlled reception. The ball was moving while he was turning, so it was not a football move following a possession.
Don’t bother.I'd rather he catch the ball and hang on, oddly enough.
True! I've had issues with his calls in previous games.It's Dan Fouts. As long as Joe underthrew it he's happy. And if Joe doesn't underthrow it he can just say Joe underthrew it anyway.
Yeah, it's not worth hoping Joe turns it around at this point this game. Far cry from his play the past four weeks.Don’t bother.