• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Be sure to sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

The Well-Mannered Politics Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Somerset Ravens

Pro Bowler
they released confidential materials because they were made confidential for partisan reasons and were files that were withheld from the committee for obvious suppression reasons - more importantly those materials were pertinent to the nomination

when the GOP has consistently ignored any dealings within house behind closed doors the only way to counter that is to force them to acknowledge these accusations etc. by making them public

every "democrat" issue you've named is a response to a republican manipulation of the system that is contrary to good and fair process
So you are saying two wrongs make a right? That tells me both sides are wrong.

So how was serving up Dr. Blasey Ford as a sacrificial lamb a response to a republican manipulation of the system that is contrary to good and fair process?

Both parties are sleazy!
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
So you are saying two wrongs make a right? That tells me both sides are wrong.

So how was serving up Dr. Blasey Ford as a sacrificial lamb a response to a republican manipulation of the system that is contrary to good and fair process?

Both parties are sleazy!

The Holocaust was legal. Slavery was legal. Segregation was legal. People who hid Jews in their homes were criminalized. People who freed slaves were criminalized. People who stood up for equality and justice were criminalized. Legality is not a guide for morality...


now those are extreme examples but for many people the Kavanaugh nomination really has implications for their future rights

and its not really fair to simply say Dr Blasey Ford was served up as a sacrificial lamb given the complex situations and dealings that ended up with her giving testimony publicly at all...
 

JO_75

Hall of Famer
Hold on a minute guys........

tenor.gif


Now you all can continue.
 

Somerset Ravens

Pro Bowler
The Holocaust was legal. Slavery was legal. Segregation was legal. People who hid Jews in their homes were criminalized. People who freed slaves were criminalized. People who stood up for equality and justice were criminalized. Legality is not a guide for morality...


now those are extreme examples but for many people the Kavanaugh nomination really has implications for their future rights

and its not really fair to simply say Dr Blasey Ford was served up as a sacrificial lamb given the complex situations and dealings that ended up with her giving testimony publicly at all...
Comparing the Kavanaugh nomination with the Holocaust, slavery and segregation is absurd.
I feel very bad for Dr. Blasey Ford, she is the real victim here. Her life will forever be impacted. Who put her in this position?
Who stood to gain by bringing her to testify in public? Senator Feinstein and the democrats did. I do believe if the roles had
been reversed the republicans would have done the same thing.

I feel your faith in the democrats is truly misguided.
 

JO_75

Hall of Famer
and just in case this was ever in doubt:there are a few things that are not in doubt about this situation:
1.) Kavanaugh lied under oath which is illegal
2.) There have been multiple complaints about Kavanaugh throughout his legal career
3.) The FBI investigation into Kavanaugh was constrained for no justifiable reason
4.) Kavanaugh demonstrated partisanship during his hearings and a temperament unbefitting of a judge
5.) Organisations that supported him withdrew their support in the wake of those hearings

none of those 5 points even include the sexual assault allegations which were more than credible on top of everything else


Ford also lied under oath as well. Even her ex boyfriend came out and disputed some of her claims, why are her friends denying everything she is saying? Her ex boyfriend says she COACHED a friend on how to pass a polygraph test which under oath she said she NEVER did. He even says her lie about being afraid of flying wasn't true.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ch...for-potential-polygraph-grassley-sounds-alarm
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
Ford also lied under oath as well. Even her ex boyfriend came out and disputed some of her claims, why are her friends denying everything she is saying? Her ex boyfriend says she COACHED a friend on how to pass a polygraph test which under oath she said she NEVER did. He even says her lie about being afraid of flying wasn't true.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ch...for-potential-polygraph-grassley-sounds-alarm

that letter has been latched onto by conservatives despite details of it being disputed from multiple sources (including the person she supposedly helped with a polygraph) and the ex-boyfriend is sketchy at best with obvious motives to "lie" or sully Dr Ford...

on top of that Dr Ford was not being nominated for a supreme court lifetime appointment so her lying under oath would be problematic but not really an excuse for Kavanaugh to have lied

on top of that - the assertion that she never even mentioned the assault is not evidence of her lying given that before her testimony she revealed that she hadnt even told her husband until they went to marriage therapy...

by all accounts her testimony was consistent, credible, believable and was representative of someone who does not fit the profile of a false accuser - its also important to remember she was not on trial (albeit she was treated as such)

Kavanaugh clearly committed perjury in his hearings and that should have disqualified him from the appointment off the bat no matter what happened in other terms
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
Comparing the Kavanaugh nomination with the Holocaust, slavery and segregation is absurd.
I feel very bad for Dr. Blasey Ford, she is the real victim here. Her life will forever be impacted. Who put her in this position?
Who stood to gain by bringing her to testify in public? Senator Feinstein and the democrats did. I do believe if the roles had
been reversed the republicans would have done the same thing.

I feel your faith in the democrats is truly misguided.

you're assuming that it wasnt in the public interest to know about this...
I feel terrible also for Dr Ford that she had to go through that ordeal and that she had to give testimony in the first place but clearly without that testimony the republicans wouldnt have even pretended to care let alone actually cared (which they clearly didnt and dont)

if the roles had been reversed the republicans may have done the same thing - but the democrats have repeatedly shown that they will not hide from allegations - they've not tolerated those accuse...
When Franken was accused—he resigned
When Schneiderman was accused—he resigned
When Conyers was accused—he resigned
When Trump was accused—he was elected
When Moore was accused—he was endorsed
When Kavanaugh was accused—he was confirmed

doesnt look like the parties are the same to me...
 

Somerset Ravens

Pro Bowler
you're assuming that it wasnt in the public interest to know about this...
I feel terrible also for Dr Ford that she had to go through that ordeal and that she had to give testimony in the first place but clearly without that testimony the republicans wouldnt have even pretended to care let alone actually cared (which they clearly didnt and dont)

if the roles had been reversed the republicans may have done the same thing - but the democrats have repeatedly shown that they will not hide from allegations - they've not tolerated those accuse...
When Franken was accused—he resigned
When Schneiderman was accused—he resigned
When Conyers was accused—he resigned
When Trump was accused—he was elected
When Moore was accused—he was endorsed
When Kavanaugh was accused—he was confirmed

doesnt look like the parties are the same to me...

Please remember I am not defending the Republicans, I already said they are sleazy.

Wasn’t Conyers the Congressman who paid off his victims with government money? I don’t think I saw
Bill Clinton on your list.

There is no need for us to continue our discussion because it seems you have made up your mind up
that the democrats can do no wrong in your eyes. Whereas I think there is bad on both sides. We will
have to agree to disagree.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
Please remember I am not defending the Republicans, I already said they are sleazy.

Wasn’t Conyers the Congressman who paid off his victims with government money? I don’t think I saw
Bill Clinton on your list.

There is no need for us to continue our discussion because it seems you have made up your mind up
that the democrats can do no wrong in your eyes. Whereas I think there is bad on both sides. We will
have to agree to disagree.

the post you quoted literally just showed you that of course democrats can do wrong - they have done wrong but they are far more accountable about their mistakes

and i have made up my mind - the GOP and their ilk (as well as conservatives in my own country) have demonstrated views and behaviours that i despise and have policies and ideas that threaten the existence, livelihoods and rights of vast swathes of people and affect people i care about in demonstrable ways

yes there are bad things about democrats but id say there is nothing redeemable about the GOP
 

Ludy51

Hall of Famer
Ford also lied under oath as well. Even her ex boyfriend came out and disputed some of her claims, why are her friends denying everything she is saying? Her ex boyfriend says she COACHED a friend on how to pass a polygraph test which under oath she said she NEVER did. He even says her lie about being afraid of flying wasn't true.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ch...for-potential-polygraph-grassley-sounds-alarm
As well as the multiple OTHER phobias she claimed to have that were lies...


There wasn’t a shred of proof or clear testimony the whole way through and that was just for Fords accusation, the other 2 were just laughable.
 

Ludy51

Hall of Famer
you're assuming that it wasnt in the public interest to know about this...
I feel terrible also for Dr Ford that she had to go through that ordeal and that she had to give testimony in the first place but clearly without that testimony the republicans wouldnt have even pretended to care let alone actually cared (which they clearly didnt and dont)

if the roles had been reversed the republicans may have done the same thing - but the democrats have repeatedly shown that they will not hide from allegations - they've not tolerated those accuse...
When Franken was accused—he resigned
When Schneiderman was accused—he resigned
When Conyers was accused—he resigned
When Trump was accused—he was elected
When Moore was accused—he was endorsed
When Kavanaugh was accused—he was confirmed

doesnt look like the parties are the same to me...
Accusations don’t matter until they are substantiated... for both sides.

Hows Keith ellison doing by the way?

How long did Ted Kennedy stay in the senate after 1969?

Proof of Trump accusations? And no, accusations aren’t proof.

Moore seemed to have some weight but I dont recall definitive proof being presented for the specific pedophile accusations
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
Accusations don’t matter until they are substantiated... for both sides.

Hows Keith ellison doing by the way?

How long did Ted Kennedy stay in the senate after 1969?

Proof of Trump accusations? And no, accusations aren’t proof.

Moore seemed to have some weight but I dont recall definitive proof being presented for the specific pedophile accusations

running for an office - especially a lifetime appointment should be held to a higher standard than just innocent until proven guilty - public officials must be absolutely beyond reproach - that means beyond all reasonable doubt they must be innocent - would you employ someone in any other industry with accusations like this uninvestigated... no you would either wait until a full investigation were completed or you would simply move on to a different candidate (of whom there will be many just as good) who dont have these allegations surrounding them

so accusations do matter - because false accusations are so statistically rare and false accusers have a very specific profile in a vast majority of cases (which christine blasey ford certainly does not fit any of) - you have to deal with them

when you have credible allegations like this you have to let them run their course at the very least not just sweep them away

i mean are you really saying that you're ok with Kavanaugh being on the supreme court as a perpetrator of sexual assaults?
 

Ludy51

Hall of Famer
running for an office - especially a lifetime appointment should be held to a higher standard than just innocent until proven guilty - public officials must be absolutely beyond reproach - that means beyond all reasonable doubt they must be innocent - would you employ someone in any other industry with accusations like this uninvestigated... no you would either wait until a full investigation were completed or you would simply move on to a different candidate (of whom there will be many just as good) who dont have these allegations surrounding them

so accusations do matter - because false accusations are so statistically rare and false accusers have a very specific profile in a vast majority of cases (which christine blasey ford certainly does not fit any of) - you have to deal with them

when you have credible allegations like this you have to let them run their course at the very least not just sweep them away

i mean are you really saying that you're ok with Kavanaugh being on the supreme court as a perpetrator of sexual assaults?
I’m OK with Justice Kavanaugh being on the Supreme Court as long as the accusations are not proven. And no I don’t give a DAMN what position they’re running for EVERYONE no matter who, is entitled to a presumption of innocence in legal cases and public ones and to not do so even once is to crumble the very fabric of our legal system.

If all it takes is an accusation then....well i don’t even want to think of how awfull that would be. I mean that system doesn’t even work in fantasy land.

The accusations are laughable at best and if your really want a full investigation, then you go to the police, to do what she did is both unproductive and damaging to her credibility.

She wasn’t afraid of flying, she lied under oath also, which of you are using that as a damning endorsement then there you go, and she went to a politician instead of law enforcement, exactly what you would do if you were more concerned with the public perception of him rather then any legal reprocussion. And the FBI even said there wasn’t anything to investigate before they were forced to do there best over a week.

She didn’t know The Who what when where or how of her story. Ask any sexual assualt victim and they can give you every detail of where they were, who they were with, what time it happened, and the people they call forward don’t dispute their claims.

Take Joanna Broderick for example. In her allegations against Bill Clinton, she could tell you in exact detail what happened.

Oh, and also, every current and future Democrat nominees raped me, guess that’s all I need to say about that.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
I’m OK with Justice Kavanaugh being on the Supreme Court as long as the accusations are not proven. And no I don’t give a DAMN what position they’re running for EVERYONE no matter who, is entitled to a presumption of innocence in legal cases and public ones and to not do so even once is to crumble the very fabric of our legal system.

If all it takes is an accusation then....well i don’t even want to think of how awfull that would be. I mean that system doesn’t even work in fantasy land.

The accusations are laughable at best and if your really want a full investigation, then you go to the police, to do what she did is both unproductive and damaging to her credibility.

She wasn’t afraid of flying, she lied under oath also, which of you are using that as a damning endorsement then there you go, and she went to a politician instead of law enforcement, exactly what you would do if you were more concerned with the public perception of him rather then any legal reprocussion. And the FBI even said there wasn’t anything to investigate before they were forced to do there best over a week.

She didn’t know The Who what when where or how of her story. Ask any sexual assualt victim and they can give you every detail of where they were, who they were with, what time it happened, and the people they call forward don’t dispute their claims.

Take Joanna Broderick for example. In her allegations against Bill Clinton, she could tell you in exact detail what happened.

Oh, and also, every current and future Democrat nominees raped me, guess that’s all I need to say about that.

in what way were those allegations laughable?

and you obviously didnt watch the testimony because she did answer the who, what, where, when and how of the story - she answered all those questions under oath

and with statements like that i dont think you've ever spoken to any survivor ever - because PTSD from incidents like that does different things to everyone's brain - some can never forget the details and others have mental blocks that form over anything even remotely related to the incidents

i can tell by the way you talk about this that you've never even considered why survivors rarely report sexual crimes and why they dont come forward
 

Oldfaithful

Hall of Famer
AND LADIES AND GENTLEMEN... THE PROBLEM WITH MODERN POLITICS...

Oh my god. This entire Kavanaugh has killed so many brain cells on my end.

THE FOLLOWING RANT IS NOT AIMED AT ANY FORUM MEMBERS. THESE ARE MY THOUGHTS ON THE STATE OF POLITICS. I WORK FOR THE GOVERNMENT, BUT I HAVE MY PROBLEMS WITH THEM.

Okay. I've kept my mouth shut long enough on this issue. That situation was literally a microcosm of the issues and the immense polarization. I'm a registered republican but I am the most split ticket voter you will ever meet. I am applying to go work for republicans and democrats alike.

Why did the two party system work up until about 15 years ago when people started their needless bitching. Whether you like Clinton or Regan is irrelevant, those two got shit done despite having a the other party hold the majority power. Why? They compromised. This notion that so many people have that "being in the middle is not a political party" is utter fucking bullshit. Partisanship has gone more extreme on BOTH sides, BOTH republicans and democrats piss me off equally because this "The other side is utterly reprehensible I won't even talk to them" is UTTERLY CHILDISH.

1. "Republicans started it". Okay, that's a fact, they're wrong for making congress inherently more partisan.... You've continued it. What are you, five? I have two little siblings and this is the logic and reasoning of two little siblings who got into a fight. "He started it". You still finished it. The republicans and democrats alike claim to be the "bigger party". Guess what, both of them are equally childish, and have been since about 2004. I've a registered republican and they do some pretty terrible things: they're politicians, all of them are fucking terrible. And if you think the democrats are squeaky clean and are absolved of anything, it's just as fucking bad.
2. @29BmoreBird22 hit it on the head. He lives in conservative area and it's "fucking libtards". Liberals aren't inherently bad people and disagreement is a good thing. If the country went left all the time we'd go into absurd amounts of debt, worse than what we did. If we went fully republican all the time we'd declare bankruptcy. I got asked the question yesterday of whether I'm more into Hayek or Keynesian economics... There's a time and a place for both. There's a time and a place to spend fucktons of money and there's a time and a place to cut taxes. We've had successful economies under both parties for a reason, and that is a FACT. I live in a liberal area, and you know how often I get called a "racist, xenophobe facist" for not being a liberal(Oh, and btw. Super pro choice, pro gay marriage, super egalitarian. I live by the philosophy of, "if you're nice to me, I'm nice to you. People need to judge based off of character, not characteristics, which is my primary criticism of not the republicans as a whole, but the extremist tea party scumbags that have decided to take over the party because us moderate republicans are "not real republicans") . I disagree with @29BmoreBird22, @The Raven, and @rossihunter2 on SO many things politically.... I don't think they're stupid. I don't think they're bad people. They have different opinions, that's okay. But when people use the blanket terms, "libtards", "facists", "bourgeoise trash", "SJW", nothing, and I repeat, NOTHING is going to get done.
3. This brings me back to point one... STOP ACTING LIKE FUCKING CHILDREN. It doesn't matter who started it, if any of you are really the bigger person. ACT LIKE IT. You know I didn't hate at all during this entire shitshow? The Senator that I am probably going to work for. Sure, he voted in favor of confirmation, but that's not really his fault. He's a junior senator who was coerced into it by tea party members who likely threatened to remove him from a committee? What do you want him to do? Resign? Ruin his career of public service where he's done a TON of good work? No.. He doesn't deserve that shit after getting strong armed. Both parties do it, it's how congress is fundamentally structured. If you vote against your party, you generally get punished. Usually, that's understandable. But now that idiot tea party members and progressives have done a takeover, it's (predictably) gotten much worse.. Which leads me to points four and five.

4. Ah the tea party. For all of me growing up around the business world and me agreeing with you on a ton of fiscal things, especially as I've worked for a Fortune 500 company in the past. FDR's new deal may have been very overrated in the scheme of things(history actually proves that WW2 got us out of the Great Depression), introducing some of the policies FDR did actually helped the economy in the long run. LBJ and Clinton were good economic presidents. Your problem? Idiots like Ted Cruz and Mitch McConell have decided to go full tea party and ruin everything for everyone. You've fundamentally divided the party, and the moderates, the ones such as Paul Ryan, John Hoeven, Lindsay Graham, Corey Gardner, have either gotten shit, decided to fuck off and head into the private sector. You managed to win both houses of Congress through some sensationalism and the extremists took over. It doesn't help that Fox News is terrible. The Tea Party is so fucking archaic socially and want to send things back to the Stone Age, and you've given the rest of the party a bad name. What you've done is divide your own party. Congrugaltions. If there's anything the democrats do correctly it's they vote as one job. I actually like Paul Ryan, and if you listen to him he's a reasonably intelligent human being. Somehow, with Donald Trump as the President he's still the most hated man in the entire government according to republicans. The hilarious truth is we need a "RINO", or a "DINO". Someone who is willing to put his foot down and tell Congress to stop having this pointless dick measuring contest when both of you are tinier than an inchworm. You've decided to act like children and demonize the democrats because they simply disagree with you. Liberals are not evil, their ideology as a whole isn't stupid. A few bad apples don't ruin the bunch even though that's what the media portrays them to do. Grow the fuck up and get a stick out of your ass.

5. And progressives. You've ruined the democrats too. Sure, you have your reasonable ones such as Corey Booker, Barrack Obama(I don't agree with him on everything but he's certainly not an extremist like so many republicans paint him out to be), Tim Kaine, Joe Biden. Then you get your progressives. Bernie Sanders' economic policies have never worked in a country with the dense population we have. In fact, for all the things he preaches(income equality), they would just make things work. Elizabeth Warren is extreme, and since Kamala Harris is likely to be President one day, she's bad too. Let's get this out of the way. YES, racism, sexism, homophobia, etc is all bad. You should never judge people for your characteristics but you've taken things too far. There's always going to be those things even if they are totally reprehensible, and the sad but honest truth is you can do nothing about it. Some people are just inherently bad. Education can't save them. And while I believe that discussion and disagreement is a good thing, I will make an exception for idiots that are discriminatory. They're not worth shaming, they're not worth talking too, they are LOST CAUSES as human beings. Your problem is the opposite of the tea party. You are also sensaltionist, but you think with your heart and not your brain. There are problems in this country, the Tea Party doesn't want to admit it, but you want to paint America as this racist, sexist, misogynistic country. There are no tangible laws discriminating against anyone anymore. That doesn't mean discrimination doesn't occur, it certainly does, and to not admit it is stupid. We're not perfect but we're not only improving massively and have come a LONG WAY in the past 50 years alone, but the law has done it's job. Abortion is legal, and will stay that way. Gay marriage is legal, and it will say that way. LEGALLY other races have the same rights across the country. Men and women legally have the same rights. Most people don't get it, but there's so much a government can do unless it is fascist, and going in that direction is not the way we should go. You demonize the other party so hard that even the moderate republicans and the normally blue rust belt decided to vote for DONALD FUCKING TRUMP. Think about that for a second. We voted a reality TV star to be the leader of the free world because of childish people.. I've been saying it since the beginning; Trump isn't the disease, he's the symptom of childish media and Congressional polarization. The hilarious thing is he's likely going to win again because the way he won is still working (he would say ridiculous shit, get free press, and not have to spend a dime to get his political agenda out despite the fact that he clearly didn't know what the fuck he was doing)

6.This all started when your rhetoric became utterly fucked. This goes for both sides. "Libtards", "Liberalism is a mental disorder", "Toxic masculinity", "Straight white males". Congragulations, instead of having civil debates you both have resorted to namecalling and demonizing the current generation for the sins of the previous. Both parties are so obsessed with "being correct", that they aren't even willing to talk to each other and work things out to solve the correct answer.

The thing that pissed me off about this Kavanaugh situation is that it was so predictable and both parties decided to act like children and neither one is mature enough to admit that they're both fucking up so hard. I wouldn't object if every incumbent member of congress up for reelection lost. I would love it if Trump lost to a moderate republican and not a tea party member, and if someone who was a moderate democrat decided to run for them, I'd likely vote in favor. But nope. You've got Congress right now polarized because both sides have decided to act like children and start a dick measuring contest. Instead of accomplishing things through civil disagreement and discussion, and reaching a compromise like you used to, you've both become obsessed with being correct and taking a "my way or the highway approach". "The other party is evil".

No they're fucking not. Both parties have bad apples, that's a given. Every company or workforce has corruption. Not everyone is a good person like most of you are(aside from one member who I hope never returns). So I will end this long, winded, tirade with a few notes.


SUMMARY
@Militant X 1 @Ludy51 @Inqui @rossihunter2, @29BmoreBird22 , @The Raven. I think all of you are reasonable, intelligent human beings. I respect your opinions and think discussion is the way to go. I may disagree with each of you, and any other liberal on this board. I like the fact that we are all willing to come together and discuss things. There's no ill will on my end and in my opinion none of you are "partisan hacks". I appreciate the passion and the vigor, and unlike most of the people I discuss politics each of you bring FACTS. I don't agree with you on everything but when we do talk it seems like each of us can come to conclusions. That is why democracy is the best form of governance. I hate the idea of this thread, but each of you make it civil. Each of you make valid points. You are the proof of my claim, "discussion is good. Discussion leads to disagreement, which leads to compromise, which leads to progress". I lived in Spain this year. Their politics are far worse than ours, it's just that ours are more public. It's because of each of you that I don't close this thread. Please continue to keep it civil going forward. No matter where you lie on the spectrum, please continue to keep your civil, willing to discuss demeanor.

@Somerset Ravens I wholeheartedly agree with you for different reasons. Everyone in that senate hall that worked for the government acted like a child. It was embarassing to watch if you did, for anyone. I hate Trump, but I would not complain if we had 100 new senators tomorrow.


@DeVito52 @SepticeyePoe SEND CONGRESS TO THE PIT OF MISERY
 
Last edited:

Oldfaithful

Hall of Famer
See. You can disagree all you want. I'm a conservative, I am not going to get mad or demonize you. I hate the parties and what they're becoming, not the members.
 

Ludy51

Hall of Famer
in what way were those allegations laughable?

and you obviously didnt watch the testimony because she did answer the who, what, where, when and how of the story - she answered all those questions under oath

and with statements like that i dont think you've ever spoken to any survivor ever - because PTSD from incidents like that does different things to everyone's brain - some can never forget the details and others have mental blocks that form over anything even remotely related to the incidents

i can tell by the way you talk about this that you've never even considered why survivors rarely report sexual crimes and why they dont come forward
If she’s so credible then why was the only evidence brought forward during this saga the calandra from Kavanaugh?

Except I did watch the testimony, and it seemed very clearly to me that she wasn’t pulling anything from memory, just prepared statements. Meaning those details just cant be trusted.

And why is it she’s the only victim to come forward who didn’t pull anything from memory? Every single other credible accuser against public officials that I can think of at least had every consistent detail of the night, they didn’t need Time to prepare statements with others

And really, how much does her being under oath matter really? Who’s gonna prosecute the supposed victim of perjury for crying out loud?

And while I understand why someone might not report the incedent, you can’t allow that and then say that and then say, well we can’t let Kavanaugh in because we can’t definitively say he didn’t do it because we didn’t investigate when it happened.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top