• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

Coaching Carousel 2026

I wonder if McDaniel would be comfortable working for Weaver lol
 
$20m is what Reid makes, $10m for staff isn't crazy considering the top coordinators are in the 4m+ range. Total control is as you say, a subjective thing. So he's basically asking for tippy top of the market, not really re setting the market and it's a negotiating stance.

The Giants are so hot on him they could cave to that almost entirely.
So I was going off Grossi's original post, which was $30M for comp, not $20M. I think he revised it.

Giants have to be willing to fire Schoen.
 
I know it's the popular thing but I don't get the impression they care overly concerned about play calling experience/success or anything like that when it comes to the HC. They're going to pick the best guy for the job, and if that's Weaver (or anyone else in a similar vain), so be it.

Their top 3 targets that I've heard - Weaver, Kubiak, and Minter (in no order) - all are completely different molds, so they're definitely open to a lot of different options here.

It’s my main concern because I’m tired of the constant changing of offensive coordinator and identity. I would think they would prioritize this and get someone who could solve this issue but I understand trying to find the best guy for the job.

From Biscotti's perspective, he probably looking for the best guy to be able to manage the team/business first and foremost and anything else that comes with that is merely an additional benefit.

This isn’t how I would be approaching it. I would rather think of what my weakness is as an organization and solve that (finding and keeping offensive minded coaches/schemes). The Ravens have a great history of finding, developing and implementing defensive minded coaches and schemes. So I would focus elsewhere now. Maybe that’s backwards but idk.
 
I know it's the popular thing but I don't get the impression they care overly concerned about play calling experience/success or anything like that when it comes to the HC. They're going to pick the best guy for the job, and if that's Weaver (or anyone else in a similar vain), so be it.

Their top 3 targets that I've heard - Weaver, Kubiak, and Minter (in no order) - all are completely different molds, so they're definitely open to a lot of different options here.
Have you heard anything on LaFleur, Stefanski, or McDaniel?
 
Giants have to be willing to fire Schoen.
Which is another reason Atlanta might be the perfect spot for him. As I mentioned, Atlanta has the players for him to simulate what he had in Baltimore. Now if he wants his own GM, then as you said they have to be willing to fire Schoen.

They would have fired him already if they truly wanted to fire him and not have him lead the Head Coaching search. Since Miami hired a GM, only place left with a GM opening where he can choose his own GM is Atlanta. Look for Chad Alexander who is assistant GM for the Chargers who John is familiar with to be the GM in Atlanta or wherever John lands.
 
I just mentioned this individually via PM, but on the Weaver front...

People fear his defensive success (or lack thereof) but if he were to get the job, I would almost be willing to bet part of the agreement is that he is not going to be running the defense. There would be an expectation that the DC in place is in charge. I was told very explicitly that they viewed his as a much better HC candidate than a DC candidate and that was the biggest factor why he didn't get the job back when Orr did. I don't see that switching, especially after seeing similar themes down in Miami.

that should be a big negative for his candidacy though
like he's clearly got great qualities but if this is something they have to say then that should be close to disqualifying in the modern NFL
 
Reading this article about Stefanski and Sanders and Gabriel makes me very concerned about him as our HC. It’s due to the issue of Sanders holding onto the ball and how he didn’t fit his system as well when we have Lamar Jackson at QB who has been

Well tbf Lamar holds the ball too long and too consistently.

One reason I want an offensive coach, is so they can HOPEFULLY pound into Lamar’s head the importance of staying on schedule as often as possible, and call plays to accommodate that.
 
It’s my main concern because I’m tired of the constant changing of offensive coordinator and identity. I would think they would prioritize this and get someone who could solve this issue but I understand trying to find the best guy for the job.

From Biscotti's perspective, he probably looking for the best guy to be able to manage the team/business first and foremost and anything else that comes with that is merely an additional benefit.

This isn’t how I would be approaching it. I would rather think of what my weakness is as an organization and solve that (finding and keeping offensive minded coaches/schemes). The Ravens have a great history of finding, developing and implementing defensive minded coaches and schemes. So I would focus elsewhere now. Maybe that’s backwards but idk.
And I'm sure that's going to be part of the consideration, but it's also up to the candidates to sell themselves at that point. Not many people question that Monken and even Roman had great and highly functional offenses for at least a couple of seasons, but they stagnated and fizzled out and that's why we are where we are.

What if you hire Kubiak (just picking a name for the sake of the argument) and he suffers the same fate... a couple of great years and then he fizzles out? You put yourself in the same position you are today. That's where it's going to be on these guys to come and state what they can do for the team today, but also how they see the league trending and how they can stay ahead of the curve.

Just playing devil's advocate here... if you have someone that isn't some whiz on either side of the ball, but represents the culture you want, how do they respond? Do they value a pipeline of coaches that can consistently keep that identity going, much like we have defensively until the Orr hiring?

For what it's worth, I generally prefer that we have someone that specializes so we can keep some of that consistency as well. But I also don't see a reason to pigeonhole it. I don't think it makes much sense to go from a Harbaugh to a similar style of leader if we're truly looking for change, but I also understand why you'd highly consider those guys, because it has been a success. Just because Harbaugh petered out here at the end doesn't mean that style doesn't still have its place here.
 
that should be a big negative for his candidacy though
like he's clearly got great qualities but if this is something they have to say then that should be close to disqualifying in the modern NFL
Depends where they place their value though. If it's a culture setter that they want and they trust him to put the right guys around himself...
 
I don’t get the infatuation with Stefanski tbh. The other two are slam dunks imo
I don't think he works for our franchise just cuz his offensive style but I totally disagree about not getting the infatuation he is an INCREDIBLE coach.

Only coach in browns history to have a slimmer of success. Two time coach of the year. Has to work with one of if not the most toxic gms and owners in the entire league. Coached a team that fairly beat the chiefs in the divisional and got robbed off the Bs penalty. Has beaten the Steelers once per year with a far inferior team often. Has beaten Joe burrow ever single year and owned him. Has cooked Lamar or the ravens once a year too. Owner and gm go completely against what he wants specially at qb. Takes baker to elite seasons and they trade him. Great leader of men. He is an incredible option.

Just not with Lamar's style.
 
Top