The level of competition in the SEC is probably higher than in the Missouri Valley Conference.
One question that I wish was asked more and brought up with more than the ''higher player on our board'' is this.
What did the FO see in hurst over goedert? Most people had him as the number 1 TE in the class. Why didn't this FO think so?
On tape I can see why..
I had Goedert rated ahead of him and agree that Hurst is far more athletic. That being said, TEs typically take some time to adjust to the NFL, but Hurst seems far more ready to get on the ground running more than any tight end in this draft or possibly in recent history,that's the only thing i can think of tbh
No. On this board maybe so. But not out in the real world.Most people had Goedert over Hurst?
No. On this board maybe so. But not out in the real world.
Stats...checkmateSeriously, someone here need to give me one thing goedert does better than hurst, other than contested catch.
Lol deebo Samuel was the lynchpin of that shit offense and the play calling showed it clearly. But the film showed hurst was another league of athlete, with a pros mentality and maybe the best hands in his class.Stats...checkmate
I've actually seen people grade the hurst pick poorly based on his lack of stats in college.
Lol idk man Porsche's are super nice but a Ferrari is a tier above.You complaining about this shit is literally akin to complaining about getting a Gibson Les Paul traditional vs. a Gibson Les Paul Custom. The Custom is indeed a superior guitar... But really by how much? It's like comparing a Ferrari to a goddamn Porsche. The Ferrari will handle better sure, but the Porsche is still a goddamn Porsche.
Clearly Hurst was the #1 TE on the Ravens board. He was also the best TE on many pundits' boards. So who cares about a hypothetical small college TE who didn't play against meaningful competition in Dallas Goedert anyway? The Ravens pride themselves on finding small college gems and yet chose to stay away from Goedert. That should tell us a lot about what they thought of him.One question that I wish was asked more and brought up with more than the ''higher player on our board'' is this.
What did the FO see in hurst over goedert? Most people had him as the number 1 TE in the class. Why didn't this FO think so?
On tape I can see why..
I have to know... what do you see in goedert? Inferior athlete, total absence of technical skills, and made his whole career on either blown coverages or contested catches against defenders with no ball skills.Goedert may be more talented but needs development and this team really isn't in a position right now for us to wait 2-3 years down the line for a TE to have an impact. Hurst's talent level is incredibly close athletically, and he is more explosive with better hands, and his game is more polished.
I had a higher grade on Goedert but had Gesicki, Hurst, and Goedert(hell.. Andrews too. Fuck that was a steal) all in the same grade range. So who cares? Just because Hurst doesn't fit your precious analytics doesn't mean shit. Watch the damn tape and tell me something.. What is actually wrong with his game other than age? His game virtually has no weaknesses. Quality route runner? Check. Vice grip hands? Check. Adaquate in jump ball situations? Check. Good explosiveness? Check. Ability to seperate on a consistent basis? Check.
Fuck me, you will literally complain about everything won't you? Life is too damn short to be so angry all the time. Sit back, drink a beer, take the edge off and stop worrying.