rmcjacket23
Ravens Ring of Honor
Second interview list is now at 3. EB and Johnson still in the mix apparently. So could be as many as 5
Add Justin Outten to the list. He's getting second interview next week.
Good points-if he's interviewing for OC that's what he"ll be offered. Personally I hope he gets it-young guy with some new ideas1. We don't know that it's more $. It might be, but he's interviewing for OC jobs, not the job he has.
2. Me personally... I think being able to elevate Geno Smith over multiple years is a bigger feather in his cap than making Lamar Jackson look good (who's already won an MVP without him).
If he doesn't get an OC gig this year, and he stays in Seattle for another year, and Geno thrives like he did this past season, he'll 100% get an OC job next year.
Would also say that Shane Waldron will likely get some mild interest for HC gigs in the future, including possibly with Seattle itself, given that Pete Carroll is one of the oldest coaches in the league (may actually be the oldest... can't remember).
If I'm him, I'm not moving for a lateral move, and I'm definitely not moving for a lateral move under a new OC.
Second interview list is now at 3. EB and Johnson still in the mix apparently. So could be as many as 5
Agreed. Think there's likely some promise there based on his last 2 games with the Broncos, but that offense was so much of a mess all season that I don't trust it completely.He’s the one I’m not particularly interested in so far of the ones mentioned
I actually forgot about him, there's been so much focus on EB here. I would prefer him or Canales over EB. For some reason I think EB would do well in Tampa.First I’ve heard that we’ve actually maybe got interest in Johnson…
He’s been number 1 on my list since before Roman left
Remains to be seen if there's interest. I think they're just suggesting that there's two guys still coaching that they MIGHT have interest in. Obviously EB is one, but I think they're just speculating that if you're going to wait on EB and interview him after the SB, they may just add Johnson to that list.First I’ve heard that we’ve actually maybe got interest in Johnson…
He’s been number 1 on my list since before Roman left
They have a new rule this year where if you haven't interviewed a candidate prior to a certain cutoff, you can't interview them until after the SB. Forget what the cut off is exactly but would imagine it had a lot to do with us being in the playoffs and then not officially pulling the plug on Roman until closer to a week later.Remains to be seen if there's interest. I think they're just suggesting that there's two guys still coaching that they MIGHT have interest in. Obviously EB is one, but I think they're just speculating that if you're going to wait on EB and interview him after the SB, they may just add Johnson to that list.
I honestly can't remember, but I thought it was fairly routine for guys to interview this week (the week before the SB) for potential gigs, but they just won't commit to leave until after the SB.
I think his boss likes it that way, especially after RR.You’re right in all this, ray lewis had no say in coach hirings or roster moves though so harbs obsession with faith is a much bigger conflict of interest than rays.
Admittedly I don't know a ton about Monken, other than his offenses at GA have been very good, but doesn't he utilize TEs in the passing game quite a bit in his schemes?
Not necessarily saying that's a bad thing, given our TE room looks a hell of a lot better than our WR room at the moment, but I would think that would turn off the crowd that wants to see less 12 or 22 personnel groupings and see more 11 personnel groupings.
As well he should. His boss' reaction was driven largely by the public's reaction. So if the public has a problem with it now, they can blame the guy in the mirror.I think his boss likes it that way, especially after RR.
No, We need to draft a receiver. Likely is useful, but we need another receiver.The "fix" at receiver would be to utilize Likely more with Andrews.
not having a 2nd round pick hurts. Now I do believe we will end up with a 2nd round pick, with either a trade back or a trading a player, ie Queen.No, We need to draft a receiver. Likely is useful, but we need another receiver.
Not Queen please. Just draft a CB or WR. THat's all I want. I swear if we draft a Safety or something dumbnot having a 2nd round pick hurts. Now I do believe we will end up with a 2nd round pick, with either a trade back or a trading a player, ie Queen.
Not Queen please. Just draft a CB or WR. THat's all I want. I swear if we draft a Safety or something dumb
I would think we would get a first for him.Queen for a second? SHIT
I would think we would get a first for him.
Smith was in his 5th yr option and a free agent at the end of the yr.We got smith for a second and a fifth