This is also a very fair point.Im all for people trying to find new ways to get ahead of competition and out smart everyone else. This type of stuff will continue to pop up for several years and while im sure some of it may pan out, some of it wont, so if its 50/50 then what does it really matter?
One thing that makes zero sense to me which i dont think was touched on, is the lack of accounting for who plays next to who. Lets say Wormley doesnt meet this guys criteria, well him next to Brandon Williams might free him up to do more. He may need a better player next to him, but this is a team sport and i dont believe you can use this as an end all be all. Working together as a team can bring out the best in some players, ie if Bowser becomes the starter next to Mosely who knows what level Mosely can take his game to because the coverage skill of Bowser will open things up.
Its interesting, i just dont buy into stuff like this for the most part.
Many players succeed or fail based on the situation they're put in. For example, I bet Garrett would be 100000x better by being on the Ravens or Patriots. Will he be good in Cleveland? I'm sure he will be. Will he realize his full potential? I'm less sure than if he went to a much more loaded team.
This computer algorithm is too black and white.