One likely is sitting out a year, the other has less of a chance at seeing the field than Humphrey.
Hurt or not, ozzie probably wouldve still taken humphrey over jones. Honestly, i wouldve even taken king over him
One likely is sitting out a year, the other has less of a chance at seeing the field than Humphrey.
Hurt or not, ozzie probably wouldve still taken humphrey over jones. Honestly, i wouldve even taken king over him
You know, it's a really tough question. I really was a huge fan of Sidney Jones and thought of him as being a worthy pick at 16 long before Humphrey, so for that reason, probably Jones.And healthy lol - and what about you?
This is pretty spot on, I also loved how fluid and aware he was, he had a great feel for staying in the receivers pocket without taking his eyes off the qb.You know, it's a really tough question. I really was a huge fan of Sidney Jones and thought of him as being a worthy pick at 16 long before Humphrey, so for that reason, probably Jones.
The big things with Jones is that he doesn't carry long speed well, despite being a pretty fast athlete, and he's just not big. He's frail and while he has great technique from press, he can get beat up by larger receivers and boxed out.
I think what really made me fall in love was that he is so damn good with his ball skills. He's basically a smaller Marcus Peters and Peters was my number one player to get last year, so maybe that's also why I'm biased.
However, if Humphrey learns to clean up his footwork and can clean up the sloppiness on deep routes, he's got the absolute highest ceiling in the draft class, so I'm not at all disappointed with landing Humphrey.
I think Jones is more pro ready, but if Humphrey hits his ceiling, he'll be the best DB from the class.
Im saying i wouldve taken king over humprhey not jonesAnd why would you have taken Kevin king over a healthy Sidney jones.
Just wondering because you would have been maybe the only person in the world who would've done that. Sidney was a top 20 lock pretty much from mid season all the way til he got injured
Yea i agree. Lattimore is just insaneThis is pretty spot on, I also loved how fluid and aware he was, he had a great feel for staying in the receivers pocket without taking his eyes off the qb.
While I'll fully agree Humphrey has a ridiculous ceiling, I think lattimore, if he stays healthy, is probably the best corner prospect I've ever seen. If he's healthy I think his floor is jimmy smith, and his ceiling is Revis in his prime or maybe higher, if that's possible
It is used in precisely zero facets of science outside of your friend zone...Not even close. Nobody ever used it for football b4. Not that I'm aware of. It's used as slang in every facet of science. And can be used as slang for anything. We used it to discuss muscle building and fat loss supplements many times. As well as workout protocols. We disagree quite often. But respect different opinions. We definitely don't get offended when somebody or even everybody disagrees. What works best for one. May not work best for everybody else.
Most of my friends don't talk football all that much or follow the draft. Will watch the first round to see who we got but that's pretty much it. Y u think I talk football here?? When a Matt Judon comes outa nowhere it is a big pleasant surprise for my friends. Like this dude is awesome where did he come from. Cuz outside of the first round and free agents nobody talks about anything else.
With Lattimore, I think he has a pretty low floor. He's an absurdly fluid and good athlete. Like, this is the type of athlete Winchester loves.This is pretty spot on, I also loved how fluid and aware he was, he had a great feel for staying in the receivers pocket without taking his eyes off the qb.
While I'll fully agree Humphrey has a ridiculous ceiling, I think lattimore, if he stays healthy, is probably the best corner prospect I've ever seen. If he's healthy I think his floor is jimmy smith, and his ceiling is Revis in his prime or maybe higher, if that's possible
I think you'd be one of the few.Im saying i wouldve taken king over humprhey not jones
I just feel his man coverage is so incredibly good that none of that matters. Let him jam and mirror and he should be blanking receivers simply doing that. He might be the only corner I've ever seen that somehow doesn't need route anticipation because he mirrors step for step what the receiver does and alters his mans direction with the most subtle of actions. He's just always there. And he doesn't keep his eye on the qb that's for sure but he doesn't seem to lack ball awareness either.With Lattimore, I think he has a pretty low floor. He's an absurdly fluid and good athlete. Like, this is the type of athlete Winchester loves.
But he only plays from press, doesn't have great route recognition, doesn't watch the quarterback or play the ball (he watches the receiver to know when to play the ball), and he's generally inexperienced.
If he reaches his ceiling, he'll be a Patrick Peterson type. Uber athlete that can follow in press man. If he doesn't, he's a year 2 Jimmy who's lack of route recognition hinders him and leaves you desiring more because you know he can do more.
Year 2 Jimmy is a really good comp, imo.With Lattimore, I think he has a pretty low floor. He's an absurdly fluid and good athlete. Like, this is the type of athlete Winchester loves.
But he only plays from press, doesn't have great route recognition, doesn't watch the quarterback or play the ball (he watches the receiver to know when to play the ball), and he's generally inexperienced.
If he reaches his ceiling, he'll be a Patrick Peterson type. Uber athlete that can follow in press man. If he doesn't, he's a year 2 Jimmy who's lack of route recognition hinders him and leaves you desiring more because you know he can do more.
Well, think of it this way-I just feel his man coverage is so incredibly good that none of that matters. Let him jam and mirror and he should be blanking receivers simply doing that. He might be the only corner I've ever seen that somehow doesn't need route anticipation because he mirrors step for step what the receiver does and alters his mans direction with the most subtle of actions. He's just always there. And he doesn't keep his eye on the qb that's for sure but he doesn't seem to lack ball awareness either.
Then again, you are hands down the most knowledgeable secondary person I've ever talked to, so maybe you see things that I can't lol
Im fine with that. ive seen humphrey play and in no way is he impressive to me. Hope hew proves me wrong thoughI think you'd be one of the few.
I'm not doubting that you've seen him play, but I question if you know what you're looking at. I also get the feeling that you would trash anyone we drafted at 16Im fine with that. ive seen humphrey play and in no way is he impressive to me. Hope hew proves me wrong though
Lol naw. Im just salty that we took humprey, but at the same time i know our staff does some good shit at developing cbs so hopefully he becomes a stud unlike every other cb to come out of bama.I'm not doubting that you've seen him play, but I question if you know what you're looking at. I also get the feeling that you would trash anyone we drafted at 16
It is used in precisely zero facets of science outside of your friend zone...
Im saying i wouldve taken king over humprhey not jones
Movies aren't science...Don't think so dude. In plenty of movies as slang as well![]()