• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

The 2022 Offseason Thread

Kahlil McKenzie? He's an intriguing player but I think the 2 way thing with him is gone. He's moved solely to the offensive side of the ball. Seems like another potential PS guy.
Yeah sorry. He is interesting though. The team wouldn't spend a lot of time with a major position change if they didn't even think we was PS level. Definitely think he is a PS candidate
 
Yeah sorry. He is interesting though. The team wouldn't spend a lot of time with a major position change if they didn't even think we was PS level. Definitely think he is a PS candidate
Just an interesting guy because he’s bounced back and forth throughout his career. Not really sure what to make of him but seems like they feel he’s worth working with at least.
 
Honestly if we had to lose, and it was to joe flacco I wouldn’t be that mad lol. Love that guy - I hope we win in a shootout. Wish the game was in Baltimore
 
1D96B681-3062-41FE-AFB3-80C1E162B41A.jpeg
 
I hate us so much for not selecting him

 
I understand why the FO did what they did. The defense needed OLB and had invested plenty of draft stock into the wr position. Let the young guys work. Bateman, Proche, Duv, Andrews, Likely and Dobbins should be enough for the pass game. 2 of those will command attention. It's up to that idiot Roman to get this thing rolling.
 
Of the first 3 picks we made, which one would you have changed for him?
None honestly. I'm just upset he's a Steeler lol. I think Ojabo is gonna be elite
 
Are we potentially totally overlooking Isaiah McKenzie? Filmstudy gave him that really good grade and was saying his offense and defense versatility could be valued. I largely dismissed that but then Faalele was talking about McKenzie also being a mentor to him and then I had to ask. Should we be paying more attention to him?

Ken gets weirdly hung up on random roster niches and then overvalues and exaggerates them all the time - he's been pondering this question with McKenzie since he first "changed" position last year

he's not making the roster - his snaps alone tell you that

Ken's a big over-reactor to preseason game action especially 2nd half play
 
Ken gets weirdly hung up on random roster niches and then overvalues and exaggerates them all the time - he's been pondering this question with McKenzie since he first "changed" position last year

he's not making the roster - his snaps alone tell you that

Ken's a big over-reactor to preseason game action especially 2nd half play
I cringe every time I see "option value" in one of these reviews. Feel like he should know damn well by now they're taking the players they think are most likely to help them win. We've seen tons of guys with 3-4 years of control get cut in favor of a vet on a 1 year deal.
 
Linderbaum for sure for me.. it dnt even matter if he is a guaranteed probowler… id still rather take the risk with pickens

on a pure grading level (for the ravens) i had Hamilton, Ojabo and Pickens all ahead of Linderbaum and i only had travis jones like 5 players down from Linderbaum too

in terms of grading him more generally (rather than ravens specifically) i would have had Linderbaum as a top 15-20ish player in the class... i think his fit for other teams was probably better than it was here which is why he was a surprise to me when we picked him

for the ravens i probably would have taken pickens over linderbaum too as well as a bunch of other guys like jermaine johnson (who dropped for apparent character/meeting issues so i can understand passing on him), andrew booth Jr (who clearly had an issue with his medicals that we didnt know about so i can understand passing on him), david ojabo (who we took at 45 anyway lol)

not mad about linderbaum though even though he wouldnt have been my choice - just didnt see the fit but he's got special levels of mobility and leverage ability that are legitimately generational

i think people would be way less fixated on pickens if he hadnt gone to pittsburgh
 
Last edited:
I cringe every time I see "option value" in one of these reviews. Feel like he should know damn well by now they're taking the players they think are most likely to help them win. We've seen tons of guys with 3-4 years of control get cut in favor of a vet on a 1 year deal.

ken's a "miss the forest for the trees" kind of guy sometimes
as you say, if there's a guy they think helps them win, they're going to do what they can to keep him over a guy who might help them save a roster spot at the backend of the roster or who might save them 1-2m

it's kind of why im not sold that powers is going anywhere - we're not in dire need of his 2m and he's clearly one of the top 8 if not top 5 OL on the team (let alone top 10), same deal with jawuan james and his 3m

i really enjoyed reading ken in the past but i guess ive just grown past his "charting" now that ive learned more about OL play in the last 3 years (mostly from college based scouting and actually watching/reading/learning from actual OL analysts/coaches/guys etc. lol) and now that i actually have access to the all-22 myself
 
ken's a "miss the forest for the trees" kind of guy sometimes
as you say, if there's a guy they think helps them win, they're going to do what they can to keep him over a guy who might help them save a roster spot at the backend of the roster or who might save them 1-2m

it's kind of why im not sold that powers is going anywhere - we're not in dire need of his 2m and he's clearly one of the top 8 if not top 5 OL on the team (let alone top 10), same deal with jawuan james and his 3m

i really enjoyed reading ken in the past but i guess ive just grown past his "charting" now that ive learned more about OL play in the last 3 years (mostly from college based scouting and actually watching/reading/learning from actual OL analysts/coaches/guys etc. lol) and now that i actually have access to the all-22 myself
I think Ken does some great work but the bias certainly seeps in. Things that he values often get those bump ups in the grades. I know all grading is subjective of course.
 
Top