Well, I look at the rest of the NFC.
-East: Cowboys. Is DAL that much better? I don't think so.
-South: depending on what the Bucs and Saints do at QB, it could be similar to the 2014 season regarding that division.
-West: Rams are still in the convo. 49ers and Seahawks are big ass question marks. Cardinals will be in the mix, but I can't call them SB contenders yet.
Just because of the uncertainty of the NFC, I say by default the Pack are SB contenders should they retain Rodgers and Adams.
I mean maybe, but the only difference between this past season and next season is the Bucs MAY take a step back, if they can't find a veteran QB they like. If we're being honest with ourselves, even putting Jimmy G on the Bucs puts them at least in-tow with GB.
For GB, its pretty simple... what are you going to do this offseason that's going to finally get you to beat better teams in the playoffs? How are you getting ahead of San Fran, Rams, etc.?
For me, they're kind of in the grouping with like Buffalo or Tennessee. Great shot to win their division due to the lack of talent from other teams in your division, but when it gets to nut-cutting time, does that really matter?
Normally I'd be on the side that says "stay relevant". But this offseason is going to mostly be about GB getting rid of some decent players, just so they can afford to pay guys already on their roster more money. That's typically not a great recipe for "making the team better". And Green Bay is probably literally one of the like 2-3 teams in the league where anything short of a SB appearance is considered a "disappointment" for them.