Ill admit to not having a grasp of the cap and how a gargantuan deal like that might be structured. And if the team feels it can work financially then I guess I would be accepting of that. In all honesty I feel he benefits greatly from having Lamar and from the scheme. I started watching him recently, going back to Flacco in 2018 and he gets wrecked one on one vs. Chubb and then two Bengals rushers in the first quarter of two games Ive watched. I'll keep watching but in general Id say he benefits greatly that teams are contain conscious vs. Lamar.
Id also say that he is often left with the "easiest" of blocks to make in the run game compared to the other 4 lineman.
we run such a right-handed running game he definitely is often just left with the dregs on the backside of the play but idk that you could find a better scheme-fit LT for Lamar right now in the way their games suit each other...
with regards to the salary cap - 23m is not what it used to be in terms of % of cap obviously but guys like nate solder got deals with avg/yrs nearly 10% of the cap in the year they signed - i dont think it's unreasonable for Stanley's future deal to be worth the 11-12% it will likely cost (depending on what happens with the cap next year) but right now if he got 23m/yr and the salary cap is exactly the same as it is right now - he'd be taking up 11.5% of the cap which i dont think is unreasonable