UPennChem
Hall of Famer
This is how I feel. I wonder if MMs vision for the defence impacts who we'll be taking to some extent?ive got no issues with not adding a LB high or with high priority
but im not going to sit here and pretend that the unit could not benefit massively (and also massively help the team) by adding talent to the group - im not advocating for significant draft capital, but nor would i be against it if that's the direction we go
i think someone like damone clark (also LSU) would be a major add - but unfortunately has the combine spinal thing so wont be available as a rookie - in dane brugler's most recent mock draft he got picked in the 7th round - he's a 2nd round talent in my view so it's a shame he wont be a viable option high
but he would be someone id love to add for the future on day 3 and just take the lost year and think of him like an extra 2023 2nd rounder (with a 1 year shorter deal)
i also wont lie to you and tell you that i have ever loved the idea of spending high capital on LB but i also cant tell you that adding a dynamic athlete to go alongside queen wouldnt be a very exciting prospect