Dom McRaven
Hall of Famer
What y'all think? I think they need to fix the hue of purple a bit, but I ain't mad at it.
Sir......let's not speak of topic #2 at this moment.The two topics I try to think the least about is 1. death and 2. Life after Justin Tucker
What y'all think? I think they need to fix the hue of purple a bit, but I ain't mad at it.
Death is a welcomed embrace compared to #2The two topics I try to think the least about is 1. death and 2. Life after Justin Tucker
I want to see a matte black helmet.I HAVE BEEN CLAMORING FOR THIS! Except I want a black jersey with white numbers and a purple outline
Same. For a while now…..I want to see a matte black helmet.
Matte black helmet, same decal as in the pic but the purple needs a chrome finishI want to see a matte black helmet.
I think it’s maybe the realization that Brady, Peyton, and mahomes are not available in every draft or FA class, you get one or two guys every now and again who play pretty well, but qbs carrying the franchise on albatross contracts seems to be a thing of the past, I don’t think the packers are feeling good about their contract to Rodgers right now, browns with watson, Vikings with Kirk, cards with murray, there’s just a shit ton of buyers remorse out there in regards to qbsThis isn't just based on the Lamar situation, though that is part of it, but I get the feeling that NFL teams are starting to look at QB differently.
No team wants to talk to Lamar. Green Bay are kicking Rodgers out the door and it seems like only one team is really interested. Carr didn't have a very competitive market, even though he's far above the usual type of QB that hits free agency. Geno and Jones' deals both seem like they have relatively easy outs after 2 years, and a lot of teams seem content to wait and see what the draft has in store.
It could be that these are all aspects of the owners' collusion. Have they all got together and decided that a competitive QB market just ends up costing them all money, so they're all going to stand back and let each team re-sign their own guy?
Or it could be that teams are forecasting a relative glut at the QB position. There aren't that many teams without a starter, teams are hopeful about all 4 guys in the draft this year and next year's group is apparently better. Maybe they just expect the draft to start throwing out 3/4 starters every year, with the increased passing in college?
There definitely a bigger group of bridge starter/high end back-up types than I can ever remember before. Jimmy G, Brissett, Mayfield, Dalton, Darnold, Jameis, Minshew, Davis Mills, Trubisky, Heinicke, Mike White, Bridgewater etc etc. There are so many guys who have played pretty well in the league that they're going to get paid less than ever before. It's never been easier to find non-disastrous QB play. Some of them might even end up having a Tannehill/Geno/Goff style career revival.
Maybe teams are less scared about missing out on QB because there are so many ways to find one now?
I personally think its getting easier and easier to find a QB you can win with, particularly with the influx of quality offensive playcallers in the league.This isn't just based on the Lamar situation, though that is part of it, but I get the feeling that NFL teams are starting to look at QB differently.
No team wants to talk to Lamar. Green Bay are kicking Rodgers out the door and it seems like only one team is really interested. Carr didn't have a very competitive market, even though he's far above the usual type of QB that hits free agency. Geno and Jones' deals both seem like they have relatively easy outs after 2 years, and a lot of teams seem content to wait and see what the draft has in store.
It could be that these are all aspects of the owners' collusion. Have they all got together and decided that a competitive QB market just ends up costing them all money, so they're all going to stand back and let each team re-sign their own guy?
Or it could be that teams are forecasting a relative glut at the QB position. There aren't that many teams without a starter, teams are hopeful about all 4 guys in the draft this year and next year's group is apparently better. Maybe they just expect the draft to start throwing out 3/4 starters every year, with the increased passing in college?
There definitely a bigger group of bridge starter/high end back-up types than I can ever remember before. Jimmy G, Brissett, Mayfield, Dalton, Darnold, Jameis, Minshew, Davis Mills, Trubisky, Heinicke, Mike White, Bridgewater etc etc. There are so many guys who have played pretty well in the league that they're going to get paid less than ever before. It's never been easier to find non-disastrous QB play. Some of them might even end up having a Tannehill/Geno/Goff style career revival.
Maybe teams are less scared about missing out on QB because there are so many ways to find one now?
Do agree on this. I have no doubt there's plenty of Owners, GMs, etc. looking at recent QB deals and the outcomes since (though its only like a 1-2 year sample size) and thinking to themselves "yikes, I don't want to be that guy".I think it’s maybe the realization that Brady, Peyton, and mahomes are not available in every draft or FA class, you get one or two guys every now and again who play pretty well, but qbs carrying the franchise on albatross contracts seems to be a thing of the past, I don’t think the packers are feeling good about their contract to Rodgers right now, browns with watson, Vikings with Kirk, cards with murray, there’s just a shit ton of buyers remorse out there in regards to qbs
I'm on the opposite side regarding QB value. (Of course I am. Maybe one day we'll agree on something?)Plus, there comes a natural point in every sport where the value of a certain position group peaks. I don't think the trajectory for QB valuations is sustainable, i.e. I don't think because the cap will be $300M in 3-4 years that QBs will automatically be getting $60-70M a year then. I don't think one has not necessarily correlate with another. The wider the gap gets between high quality veteran $ and rookie $, the more value the latter becomes and the less valuable the former becomes.
OK, but I think NFL coaches are realizing that there's more good one's than the public thinks, and that they can scheme and coach there way into winning with a good one.I'm on the opposite side regarding QB value. (Of course I am. Maybe one day we'll agree on something?)
The quote that football is both a team sport and an individual sport rings true with me. I think the QB is about 30% of a team on the field. It's relatively easy to win with a good one and very hard to win with a bad one, so I think they're underpaid compared to other positions.
That doesn't mean I think they should be paid more, or that owners are going to allow it to happen, just that the position is that influential, for good or bad.
I've thought that for years. Starters went down, back ups came in and sometimes they were competent like Keenum and Brissett and GMs said "I want to pay that guy $15M a year," and sometimes they were really good like Geno, Dak, Cousins or Foles and the GMs said "I want to pay that guy $40m a year" when what they should have been saying all along was "Maybe my own 4th or 5th Rd back up could also be good?"OK, but I think NFL coaches are realizing that there's more good one's than the public thinks, and that they can scheme and coach there way into winning with a good one.
Well and its not even that they won't invest in those guys. It's that their investment has "outs", which is what we keep referencing for Lamar.I've thought that for years. Starters went down, back ups came in and sometimes they were competent like Keenum and Brissett and GMs said "I want to pay that guy $15M a year," and sometimes they were really good like Geno, Dak, Cousins or Foles and the GMs said "I want to pay that guy $40m a year" when what they should have been saying all along was "Maybe my own 4th or 5th Rd back up could also be good?"
If that's finally dawned on them, it was about time.
Yep.I personally think its getting easier and easier to find a QB you can win with, particularly with the influx of quality offensive playcallers in the league.
The way I see it... there's at least 20 teams in the league, today, that have a QB on their roster that they feel they can win a SB with. I know fans think there's only like 5-6 great one's and everybody else is dead weight, but I guarantee coaches, GMs, and Owners don't feel that way, and only their opinion matters. I 100% think the Dolphins think they can win a SB with Tua. I think Vikings, Lions, Giants, Seahawks, Bears, etc. feel they can win a SB with the QB on their roster today. Right or wrong.
And the majority of the rest of the league either has a rookie that they're not sure about but can't move off of yet (Patriots, 49ers, etc.) or think they can get a high-quality QB in the draft in the next year or two.
Plus, there comes a natural point in every sport where the value of a certain position group peaks. I don't think the trajectory for QB valuations is sustainable, i.e. I don't think because the cap will be $300M in 3-4 years that QBs will automatically be getting $60-70M a year then. I don't think one has not necessarily correlate with another. The wider the gap gets between high quality veteran $ and rookie $, the more value the latter becomes and the less valuable the former becomes.
I think Lamar is tiers above those guys. It seems like the Ravens do too. He's a QB you win because of. The Ravens have asked him to do so much and he usually accomplished it, when healthyWell and its not even that they won't invest in those guys. It's that their investment has "outs", which is what we keep referencing for Lamar.
Seattle will gladly pay Geno $105M over three years... if he plays well. If he doesn't, he'll be gone within a year or two. Same for Carr. Same for Jones. Even all the jerking off over Cousins fully gtd deals... no team commits anything to him beyond 3 years, ever.