honestly dont know what the writer's talking about - Ismail makes some good points about his route running techniques etc. but talking about taking his snaps and giving them to productive people completely ignores the fact that even when hollywood's not playing well he's still drawing attention
and it's a bit of a stupid argument also - even with a couple of quiet performances the last 3 weeks he still leads the team in receiving yards and is only 1 reception behind mark andrews - you could levy much of the same question marks at Andrews (the only reason people havent been is because they see him demonstratively fighting on the field which is cool but his production has been pretty down vs last year)
and who is it that really needs more snaps from hollywood? boykin's snaps are disappearing in obvious passing situations for fairly obvious reasons so duvernay and snead are the 2 and 3 in most passing situations... im not sure who he's advocating should replace hollywood in those 11 personnel sets... proche? boykin?
Ismail's criticism is useful - this article though reads like someone who's pissed off because he drafted hollywood too high in fantasy
