ndub
Ravens Ring of Honor
its the classic “Schrodingers Sports” paradox
Lmao nice one, I love this
its the classic “Schrodingers Sports” paradox
100% - although i might change safety to defensive back generally - depending on what's happening with jimmy and averett next offseason we might want to invest in another young corner (especially with peters and tavon only having a year left on their deals after this year too)
Sometimes I log in here and you guys are debating some really interesting football analysis and it's a lot of fun catching up the few pages I'm behind on.
Other times you're beating a dead horse to a bloody pulp over some ridiculous semantics argument. Seriously, are we actually arguing whether sport technically exists if no-one watches it in here?!
You say “you guys” but in reality it’s one guy doing that specific thing lolSometimes I log in here and you guys are debating some really interesting football analysis and it's a lot of fun catching up the few pages I'm behind on.
Other times you're beating a dead horse to a bloody pulp over some ridiculous semantics argument. Seriously, are we actually arguing whether sport technically exists if no-one watches it in here?!
Was originally going to say db for same reasons. It's like the team has said never again after 2014. Also with the way the league is more pass heavy would make sense to bring guys in and groom them.
I think this is gonna be a defensively led team. Campbell, queen, and madubuike are gonna go tf off, Oweh and hayes are gonna look very good and our front is gonna be different.Would be nice to have a pass rush and coverage. Think this year we see a lot more pressure than recent years.
how do you come from the ravens given the way we’ve successfully weaponised analytics especially with regards to 4th downs and come out with this view
biggest blessing of the offseason was the texans hiring him - can’t believe we might have passed up on the opportunity to bring in Keith Williams and tee Martin for David Culley
i dnt really understand the analytics thing when it comes to 4th down, 2pt conversion and all that other crap.. people make it seem like its some deep dive into it but that shit is really just common sense tbh and how the game is going.Texans: *3 for 3* on 4th and short conversions
Also Texans: 4th and short on opponents' 38 yd line.
Culley potentially:
![]()
i dnt really understand the analytics thing when it comes to 4th down, 2pt conversion and all that other crap.. people make it seem like its some deep dive into it but that shit is really just common sense tbh and how the game is going.
Because punting on 4th down unless you NEED to go for it was always tradition, analytics showed that going for it all throughout the game in favorable situations adds up and the final result is NOT needing to go for it, because you’ve went for it and converted 2-3 more times and now have many more points on the scoreboard and put the game out of reach early.i dnt really understand the analytics thing when it comes to 4th down, 2pt conversion and all that other crap.. people make it seem like its some deep dive into it but that shit is really just common sense tbh and how the game is going.
Yup. Pee Wee and then two years in high school.Did you play football growing up?
I certainly wouldn't call it a debate. A debate implies that both sides are making logical arguments...Sometimes I log in here and you guys are debating some really interesting football analysis and it's a lot of fun catching up the few pages I'm behind on.
Other times you're beating a dead horse to a bloody pulp over some ridiculous semantics argument. Seriously, are we actually arguing whether sport technically exists if no-one watches it in here?!
I find your definition of taunting strange then, like you’ve been in the heat of a competitive contact sport, and you are offended by a finger wag in that context?Yup. Pee Wee and then two years in high school.
Yeah only one side here thinks quality of product doesn’t fucking matter in a billion dollar industry lolI certainly wouldn't call it a debate. A debate implies that both sides are making logical arguments...
I had no idea who Ty’Son Williams was until I watched the highlights of the game. Dude looks good. Any chance he takes Justice’s spot if he keeps it up the rest of the preseason?
They shouldnt have needed analytics to tell them that though is what im sayingBecause punting on 4th down unless you NEED to go for it was always tradition, analytics showed that going for it all throughout the game in favorable situations adds up and the final result is NOT needing to go for it, because you’ve went for it and converted 2-3 more times and now have many more points on the scoreboard and put the game out of reach early.
I just saw that penalty they gave colts guy and wow.. they dnt understand that its also sort of a momentum thing for the players also. Taunting gives players a lil boost in their confidence after making good playsI find your definition of taunting strange then, like you’ve been in the heat of a competitive contact sport, and you are offended by a finger wag in that context?