Right, but I think the difference is in the last few years, it seems to me that supply is increasing.
Josh Allen
Lamar
Kyler
Daniel Jones
Burrow
Tua
Herbert
Hurts
Lawrence
Fields
Pickett
That's 11 QBs in the last five years that have been drafted, and every single team on that list believes they can win a SB with a QB in that group either now or in the not-too-distant future. They may be wrong, but that's what they've told everybody with their decisions. That means the entire league can probably find a good franchise QB every 15 years (on average). We know some teams do better than others, but on average, that's what that looks like. And given that a lot of good QBs can play at least 10-12 at a high level now, that means the turnaround doesn't have to take that long.
Are most of those guys not "great"? Of course not, and most of them probably won't win anything. But those teams think they will for at least a 4-5 year period, if not longer.
So I think fans have this vision of like "its Mahomes or Burrow, or you have nothing". NFL teams don't think that way. In recent history, there's 2-3 pretty good QBs coming out of every single draft class. Sometimes as many as 4-5, depending on the year.
So I think the future shift is going to be every Owner looks at this and says "am I going to pay $50M a year to somebody who didn't win anything in the 3-5 years they were here", or am I going to take my chances in a draft that has probably 3-4 guys a year who I think can produce the same # of wins (or more) for a lot less $?
Or, are they going to do what they're pretty much doing, which is to stay "we're capping this". Meaning Dak doesn't cost $60M 4 years from now. He'll cost $50M, because we're not inflating the value of QBs that much anymore.