ah yes, the old get worse at 2 positions manoeuvre
Fair enough, point taken, and agreed it’s a bad idea. Regardless, we need something. I’m not a hate on Faalale guy but I do think the OL needs changed. Vorhees is by far the biggest issue outside of Stanley going down now. Emeroy Jones played RT in college so if we want to play him where would he play? If you put him anywhere else on the OL you’re throwing him into a new position. Kind of puts us in a bad spot regardless of the outcome.ah yes, the old get worse at 2 positions manoeuvre
If it were up to me, Jones is getting G reps immediately when he’s ready to practice and we see what we have in a few weeks. He projects better inside in my opinion, but know others think differently.Fair enough, point taken, and agreed it’s a bad idea. Regardless, we need something. I’m not a hate on Faalale guy but I do think the OL needs changed. Vorhees is by far the biggest issue outside of Stanley going down now. Emeroy Jones played RT in college so if we want to play him where would he play? If you put him anywhere else on the OL you’re throwing him into a new position. Kind of puts us in a bad spot regardless of the outcome.
I think that's entirely fair, and admittedly I don't know the cost of the insurance, but for me, it's more the cap savings than the actual money being paid out.So I think they do on the "mega" deals, but I don't think they'd do it for Madubuike's. I think you see it more for the like Lamar-type deals. $75M gtd really isn't that much in the grand scheme of things.
For me, the "insurance", like most insurance contracts, is a bad deal for the purchaser. That's why I think most Owners don't do it. The likelihood of career-ending injuries for star players is actually really low once you get past the guaranteed $, and most players don't get more than 2-3 years guaranteed anyway.
They had NFL experience and despite the feelings of depth, the depth has no NFL experience - or very limited.don't forget the crucial losses of Pat Mekari, Malik Harrison, Chris Board and Brandon Stephens...
makes no sense that losing 4 starters across the 2 sides of the ball (and nominally upgrading at least 1 of them if not 2) has somehow got this team to fall apart
but the vibes are horrific and maybe michael pierce, ar'darius washington and pat ricard really are that important in terms of what they bring energy-wise
NoThere's a report that Flacco may be benched for Dillion Gabriel against the Vikings on Sunday. You think Cleveland may let Flacco go, or could trade him to us? I really have my doubts about Cooper Rush and bringing back Joe may be an option to look at if Cleveland is moving on from him.
I love him but he can’t move but it would be fun to see him with actual targets to throw to, that doesn’t exist on the Browns. Flacco with Henry and our TEs and WRs would be interesting, but I think his arm might be falling off a little and he can’t move at all. If we were going to lose anyway tho for the nostalgia it would be worth itThere's a report that Flacco may be benched for Dillion Gabriel against the Vikings on Sunday. You think Cleveland may let Flacco go, or could trade him to us? I really have my doubts about Cooper Rush and bringing back Joe may be an option to look at if Cleveland is moving on from him.
And if they brought him back in a package with Belichick, you'd probably made your entire room stickyThere's a report that Flacco may be benched for Dillion Gabriel against the Vikings on Sunday. You think Cleveland may let Flacco go, or could trade him to us? I really have my doubts about Cooper Rush and bringing back Joe may be a option to look at if Cleveland is moving on from him.
And if they brought him back in a package with Belichick, you'd probably made your entire room sticky

Ngl I’d sling some yogurt on vibes aloneAnd if they brought him back in a package with Belichick, you'd probably made your entire room sticky
OK, candidly, I'm not real sure Owners care about salary cap space that much. Salary cap is fictitious accounting. They care about cash flow. The reason you would insure large contracts has less to do with the cap space created from it, and more to do with not paying out large sums of $ to players who can't produce output for you. Teams routinely cut players for marginal or little cap savings, simply because either the Owner or management doesn't want to pay out cash flow to a player they don't think will provide output. And teams have routinely traded or cut players with detrimental cap issues for the same logic.I think that's entirely fair, and admittedly I don't know the cost of the insurance, but for me, it's more the cap savings than the actual money being paid out.
I personally don't see much difference between Flacco and Rush at this point. They're not significantly different in terms of what they bring to the table.There's a report that Flacco may be benched for Dillion Gabriel against the Vikings on Sunday. You think Cleveland may let Flacco go, or could trade him to us? I really have my doubts about Cooper Rush and bringing back Joe may be a option to look at if Cleveland is moving on from him.
Maneuverwhat weird way do you spell it then lol?
It's depressing watching the Broncos pass rush knowing that's how we need to hit and we haven't been able to do so.
Bet on Bonitto's pure athleticism and get off and said the size wouldn't matter, and that became true. Cooper just straight up got better than he ever was in college. First step of both of those guys is absolutely ridiculous.
Even with Bonitto's contract, both are still extremely underappreciated.