The fact that you have no basis for your arguments except calling it fake news and saying you watched is what makes you insufferable and why people complain about you in DM's. Yes, it is really sad and pitiful that people complain about you. You really want that reputation?
The thing with saying you "watched the games" is that your memory betrays you more often than not. You remember what you want to, not what actually happened.
Just so we're clear for anyone who reads this.
The Ravens were excellent in pass pro against the Texans. On probably 1/3 of the drop backs, Flacco had at least three seconds to throw and on even the quicker throws, the pocket was so clean it was pretty remarkable. I haven't seen the line play that well since Oakland.
However, Tank has it in his mind that the play calling is calling quick plays to protect bad pass protection and that the offensive line is bad because it has a few shuffled players. Tank then reads an article that says Clowney wrecked the Ravens, so this reinforces his belief that the line is bad. Therefore, Tank will remember the line as being bad against the Texans and he'll say what he saw was bad offensive line play.
Realistically, he can't remember all 36 drop backs or even half, but because he has a predetermined notion on the subject, he's going to remember it in such a way that he wants to. There's the broadcast readily available to be watched, but he won't watch it over because 1. He doesn't want to be wrong because 2. He remembers what he saw already (he doesn't).
But remember, this is just fake news... even though it's well documented in the world of psychology. But this is what's wrong with claiming "the eye test" or saying, "I watched it, so I remember it." It's important to watch it over again to confirm things in your mind.
