Size isn't yet a problem because he hasn't played against physical corners, Mike Hughes excepted (and from what I've seen Hughes got the better part).I’m not super high on Kirk. He’s a good returner and good at taking a pass at the LOS and getting YAC, he looks fast and pretty quick, but I see stuff that says he’s the most polished WR in this class. I don’t even think anyone should be allowed to say that. He might be a good WR in the NFL but he belongs on a team like the Saints. Not us. I want a big boy like Sutton to grab Joe’s jump balls or a great route runner with great hands like Miller or Ridley who can get good seperation. Idk I don’t see how Kirk is better than Miller. Still the only real knock anyone has given on Miller is his size and that’s bs because he plays way bigger than he is. He’s got serious potential.
Health is a problem and it looks bigger and bigger as we get more news on him. Playing this style at this size makes you as vulnerable as Corey Coleman at the next level.
Not fast. The more I watch, the slower he looks. He's super quick and super explosive yes, and that makes him look fast, but when he runs a straight line he's not fast.
A lot of his production comes from scheme (screens basically) or against very soft coverage.
Connor Roges made the best comp I can think of: he's a poor man's Jarvis Landry. That's as precise as can be.