JO_75
Hall of Famer
Steelers lost to this team...
To be honest, I'm expecting the Jets to beat the Jags and all of us to be like.... we got dominated by a team that lost to the Jets?
Steelers lost to this team...
I wanted Lawson here but one thing I've noticed about our team is that we constantly rely on players who cannot stay healthy, Lawson is a great talent but it's a risk I honestly think we are justified in avoiding.Carl Lawson had 10 quarterback pressures against the Packers >.>
So, you're saying that he was not worth the risk as a mid round pick? For me, that's the exact time you take an absurdly talented injury risk.I wanted Lawson here but one thing I've noticed about our team is that we constantly rely on players who cannot stay healthy, Lawson is a great talent but it's a risk I honestly think we are justified in avoiding.
I could be wrong but the way I look at it he's good and all until he gets hurt. I'd rather use that pick on someone with potential and can stay healthy, even better scenario, there's someone who can even play immediately and they always slip for unknown reasons. I honestly think that it's better to have a good player who can stay healthy than a great one who cannot. If this team wants to cut down on injuries, then I think they should use their picks on players who can stay on the field above all else.So, you're saying that he was not worth the risk as a mid round pick? For me, that's the exact time you take an absurdly talented injury risk.
I was personally all for taking Lawson in the second, so for me, taking him in the fourth would have been a dream come true. I just view it as well worth the risk with that potential to wreck a game.I could be wrong but the way I look at it he's good and all until he gets hurt. I'd rather use that pick on someone with potential and can stay healthy, even better scenario, there's someone who can even play immediately and they always slip for unknown reasons. I honestly think that it's better to have a good player who can stay healthy than a great one who cannot. If this team wants to cut down on injuries, then I think they should use their picks on players who can stay on the field above all else.
Even with Bowser and Williams picked in 2nd and 3rd?I was personally all for taking Lawson in the second, so for me, taking him in the fourth would have been a dream come true. I just view it as well worth the risk with that potential to wreck a game.
Carl Lawson had 10 quarterback pressures against the Packers >.>
Even with Bowser and Williams picked in 2nd and 3rd?
He had lot more opportunities, too - Bowser and Timmy only got 8 snaps each last game. That's beside the point, though - what I'm asking is whether he'd use that pick on Lawson even though two picks were already spent on edge guys?so far as a pass rusher, lawson has looked better than both by quite some distance.
He had lot more opportunities, too - Bowser and Timmy only got 8 snaps each last game. That's beside the point, though - what I'm asking is whether he'd use that pick on Lawson even though two picks were already spent on edge guys?
With those two, no, but I also wasn't expecting those two.Even with Bowser and Williams picked in 2nd and 3rd?
That hit scared me so badDid anyone else see Davante Adams die yesterday?
I'd rather have both Bowser and T Will over Lawson and I liked Lawsonso far as a pass rusher, lawson has looked better than both by quite some distance.
So, you're saying that he was not worth the risk as a mid round pick? For me, that's the exact time you take an absurdly talented injury risk.