outside of the pats, all the best wr corps in the league have one dominant pseudo number 1 type receiver (in fact you could argue gronk/edelman are that guy for the pats anyway)Center is the most important hole on the OL and I didn't see any center prospects at 16 lol I would've liked lamp but I'm just as happy with Humphrey and positional wise I think he helps better short and long term.
And I just don't see receiver as a huge deal. It's been repeatedly proven to be an overrated position. And I actually think the biggest thing hurting our passing game is joes reliance on Pitta. I swear out passing game would look so much better without him on the field. It's a shame that our veteran qb has a habit of leaning so hard on him, but if removing Pitta solves the problem then do it! I really think that even if we had a stud receiver joe would still look pittas way far too often and the receivers would still look bad.
the number 1 receiver opens up holes for the other receivers on the roster who are able to consistently beat 1v1s (or at least one of them does each snap even if the number 2 doesnt the number 3 might) - so adding a wr just for depth's sake doesnt necessarily help us at this point - if corey davis or mike williams had been available at 16 then they may well have been a significant addition for the offense but adding a 3rd round wr (even though i liked guys like chris godwin) may not have impacted the offense as much as we hope so i agree that it's a little overrated just having depth pieces - what we really need is perriman (or someone else) to elevate and become a matchup nightmare which would make the rest of the receiving corps much better because they have more space to work in - arguably there werent that many guys who would change our offense after round 2