Imagine if they were pats fans lol.. only reason why i hate bradyand a big reason why you need to come here to discuss anything remotely knowledgeable. I have the same problem with some of my. Skins fan friends. Now that is major doink.
Imagine if they were pats fans lol.. only reason why i hate bradyand a big reason why you need to come here to discuss anything remotely knowledgeable. I have the same problem with some of my. Skins fan friends. Now that is major doink.
Imagine if they were pats fans lol.. only reason why i hat
But the score was 15-24.. it wasnt gonna be no OT after that failed onethis article gives some idea of why it works:
https://www.espn.co.uk/nfl/story/_/...y-nfl-teams-keep-doing-why-analytics-backs-up
and you can end up in OT still (that's why you can attempt the 2 pt on the first one because if you screw it up you've got another shot at a 2 to tie it and go to overtime)
No, we were talking hypotheticals at this point, not the game. There's a weird analytics quirk that says if you're down 14 and score, you should go for 2 because it makes you more likely to win.But the score was 15-24.. it wasnt gonna be no OT after that failed one
Yeah, it says what I suspected a few paragraphs in. It's about *winning* - and as it says, going for one twice maximises the chance of OT.
It very clearly is a debate, unless everyone knows better than Cowhwed, Simms and BoomerAfter looking at the above materials, it's pretty clear to me that going for 2 earlier gives you more information and a higher win % as has been said by give or take a few percent based on somewhat crude models.
However, again as has been said, kicking the Pat maximizes the chance on OT.
So I think it becomes a question as a coach do you think it's better to play for the win in regular time or do you think you have a better chance to win on OT? Or is a tie actually much more important than a loss for your season.
I would guess in most situations going for 2 earlier is the right thing to do but I'm certain there are circumstances where kicking would also be the better option.
After looking at the above materials, it's pretty clear to me that going for 2 earlier gives you more information and a higher win % as has been said by give or take a few percent based on somewhat crude models.
However, again as has been said, kicking the Pat maximizes the chance on OT.
So I think it becomes a question as a coach do you think it's better to play for the win in regular time or do you think you have a better chance to win on OT? Or is a tie actually much more important than a loss for your season.
I would guess in most situations going for 2 earlier is the right thing to do but I'm certain there are circumstances where kicking would also be the better option.
But the score was 15-24.. it wasnt gonna be no OT after that failed one
We were never down 14 Points.The Bengals down 14 actually just scored and decided to kick the PAT.
It very clearly is a debate, unless everyone knows better than Cowhwed, Simms and Boomer
Simms and boomer never coached and played in an era that is entirely foreign to what football is now, cowhers credentials are no better than harbaughs and he coached in an era where you didn’t need an elite qb to win a super bowl.It very clearly is a debate, unless everyone knows better than Cowhwed, Simms and Boomer
Insert appeal to authority arguments. That’s my responseSimms and boomer never coached and played in an era that is entirely foreign to what football is now, cowhers credentials are no better than harbaughs and he coached in an era where you didn’t need an elite qb to win a super bowl.
I could give a fuck what they say lol, they are there to talk, not because of their wisdom.
So this is where analytics does come in. Analytics tells you that this does not happen. It tells you that teams who go for two earlier win more. We know this because people wrote down what happened each time and checked for trends - that's what analytics is!
We were never down 14 Points.
We were down 15 points at 24-9. Scored a TD and went for 2. If we get the 2 PTs we would be down 24-17 and have the ability to tie the game and go into overtime.
The game situation is completely irrelevant to the basic fact that said QB has to make a 2pt conversion at some point. I don't buy this idea that NFL players are wilting flowers whose spirits can be crushed by not making the conversion - and Huntley showed us this isn't the case by leading another TD drive. Trying for two early gave us a chance to adjust to the failed conversion. There is nothing special about attempting two on the second try that raises his chances of converting, the only difference is that there is then no chance to correct the mistake.Except I would dare to ask how many games you have your backup QB with limited game experience who has struggled to put a real drive together finally put a drive together in this situation and on the other side an offense that has not really been a threat all day.
I love analytics but the amount of relevant game situations to the ones the Ravens were in are almost certainly not enough to make a statistically significant sample size.
At the end of the day the game came down to said QB, and the offense overall, being able to make a few plays in crunch time and they simply could not do it.
The game situation is completely irrelevant to the basic fact that said QB has to make a 2pt conversion at some point. I don't buy this idea that NFL players are wilting flowers whose spirits can be crushed by not making the conversion - and Huntley showed us this isn't the case by leading another TD drive. Trying for two early gave us a chance to adjust to the failed conversion. There is nothing special about attempting two on the second try that raises his chances of converting, the only difference is that there is then no chance to correct the mistake.
Yeah and to think a couple weeks ago were the best division in AFC. Lol. Shit changes fast in the NFL.AND STILL.... Your first place AFC North Division Leading Baltimore Ravens. We are trying to give away the division but nobody wants to take it from us.