Davesta
Ravens Ring of Honor
Well good thing Dax will be a Raven in April
#SIIE that shit to infinity my friend!
Well good thing Dax will be a Raven in April
It is quiet again on the D-coordinator's job. I know Cullen is being interviewed today. It would be so unfair to interview candidates with a decision already made no? Or is this just the way of the NFL? I cannot believe Harbs would treat his old D-line coach this badly.
@Dom McRaven should we hold a meeting, or are you in agreement?#SIIE that shit to infinity my friend!
Depends on the answer I get from @rossihunter2 and @JoeyFlex5 , is Hill a good fit for us?@Dom McRaven should we hold a meeting, or are you in agreement?
Absolutely. He looks like the prototype ravens safety based on what we saw from winks usage, and obviously macdonalds usage of him. He’s a big time athlete, he’s elite lining up at slot corner, has the movement skills to match up slot receivers and the size to take on TEs as well, and he’s an all around pretty competent safety in general, quick to read what’s happening in front of him, breaks all over the field with great pursuit and often turns what looks like a big gain into a modest gain by just eating up ground really fast for a tackle. Makes plays in the intermediate pass game.Depends on the answer I get from @rossihunter2 and @JoeyFlex5 , is Hill a good fit for us?
Depends on the answer I get from @rossihunter2 and @JoeyFlex5 , is Hill a good fit for us?
Depends on the answer I get from @rossihunter2 and @JoeyFlex5 , is Hill a good fit for us?
and I don't see him making less than 42mWell, if I'm Lamar, there's no way I'm taking something in the $30-35M range.
Deshaun Watson is at $39M
Dak is at $40M
Josh Allen is at $43M
The lowest case scenario is you argue he's in "that range", which would put him right around $40M on average. Lamar has ver little reason to accept anything that doesn't have a 4 in front of it at this point, and I think the Ravens would know they're wasting their time with offers below that.
It's going to be $40M+ in AAV, and its going to be north of $100M in guaranteed money.
in fact, I don't see him making less than anybody not named Mahomes.and I don't see him making less than 42m
There were games where they lost ugly, and hit a wall in games where that were low scoring, Greenbay, New York, Dallas, Denver...ect, quite a sizable amount of games. There's not much you can attribute to injuries on that side either. I've watched a few of those and don't recall many big plays either. Drives stagnated and they weren't able to do much.mahomes made more mistakes during that period but the chiefs offence was still one of the most efficient and explosive offences in the league at that point - just their defence was horrible until about midseason
If you can't stop the run it will be very difficult to rush the passer. We haven't had a ferocious pass rush for a long time but we've been able to get away with it by being able to stop the run and cover. None of our defense since Jackson took over as the starter have been particularly impressive in the pass rush. I do agree that we need to invest more in the pass rush, I've been preaching that but I would not want to lose our effectiveness against the run in order to build up a pass rush, even with a four-man front that can rush the passer, if a team is able to run it with success and ease then your pass rush won't be nearly as effective as it's been all year long.stopping the run is not that big a deal against playoff offences anymore - if you cant get pressure and/or you cant cover then it doesnt matter what you're doing against the run
and if we build a fortress (which i agree we should build a wall for him) it's not going to be necessarily to run the ball more - if anything it should be to protect lamar so he can go bombs away with this receiving corps we've built
There were games where they lost ugly, and hit a wall in games where that were low scoring, Greenbay, New York, Dallas, Denver...ect, quite a sizable amount of games. There's not much you can attribute to injuries on that side either. I've watched a few of those and don't recall many big plays either. Drives stagnated and they weren't able to do much.
If you can't stop the run it will be very difficult to rush the passer. We haven't had a ferocious pass rush for a long time but we've been able to get away with it by being able to stop the run and cover. None of our defense since Jackson took over as the starter have been particularly impressive in the pass rush. I do agree that we need to invest more in the pass rush, I've been preaching that but I would not want to lose our effectiveness against the run in order to build up a pass rush, even with a four-man front that can rush the passer, if a team is able to run it with success and ease then your pass rush won't be nearly as effective as it's been all year long.
Oh don't get me wrong here, I think developing a pass rush is very important and I've been vocal about it for a while but I don't think we're going to be able to develop a four-man rush comparable to certain playoff-caliber teams with the lack of cap space and holes to go along. I would love to develop a four-man rush but the interior of the DL is in trouble if we lose Campbell and Williams with no obvious successor there. It's going to be challenging to improve on certain aspects of the defense this off-season and the FO has their work cut out for them. Losing Campbell and Williams and not replacing them would be a huge blow. The 49ers and Rams are pretty good against the run. Bucs weren't all that great in the secondary and even though they had a great pass rush last year they were elite at stopping the run.Why are you concerned about stopping the run when pretty much the majority of the teams you'll need to beat to get to a SB have the ability to just throw the ball up and down the field on you at will?
Like stopping the run will help you beat Cleveland. And probably Pittsburgh. I don't know how super valuable it is to beating Buffalo, or Kansas City, or Cincinnati, or Los Angeles Chargers. Those are the teams I'm worried about for the next 5-10 years.
I'd rather have a strong secondary, a solid interior pass rush (which we don't have at all) and be mediocre or even below average against the run. I think that defense is more competitive in this NFL climate.
I don't think you can be terrible against the run and win, but I don't think you need to be great at it either. 49ers, Rams, Bengals, Chiefs. I don't think any of these teams has a great run defense at all. By rankings, they're generally fine, but they all average over 100 yards rushing/game allowed.
Kansas City is 30th in YPC allowed. Green Bay was 28th. New England, Dallas, Cincinnati, Buffalo all in the bottom half of the league.
Why do you think a team needs a good run D in order to generate pressure on a QB?If you can't stop the run it will be very difficult to rush the passer. We haven't had a ferocious pass rush for a long time but we've been able to get away with it by being able to stop the run and cover. None of our defense since Jackson took over as the starter have been particularly impressive in the pass rush. I do agree that we need to invest more in the pass rush, I've been preaching that but I would not want to lose our effectiveness against the run in order to build up a pass rush, even with a four-man front that can rush the passer, if a team is able to run it with success and ease then your pass rush won't be nearly as effective as it's been all year long.
I think he’s trying to say something more like if you can’t make teams somewhat one dimensional it’s hard to rush the passer.Why do you think a team needs a good run D in order to generate pressure on a QB?
I see plenty of teams in this league that have a good pass rush with a mediocre or worse run defense.
Like I said earlier... you can't be terrible against the run. But if this team gave up 4.5 YPC instead of 4.0 YPC, I don't think it would prohibit them from making the SB. There really aren't that many teams in this league that can beat you, consistently, by running the ball.
Its not going to happen in one year. Nobody ever thought it would. But I don't want to replace Brandon Williams with Brandon Williams. I want to replace Brandon Williams with somebody who will actually play on passing downs and not be on the sideline, like BWill has been for years. It might take two guys to do that. It might take two guys to do it, but I know I can get a pretty good run stopping lineman at really any point in the draft or even cheaply in FA. That's not a concern for me.Oh don't get me wrong here, I think developing a pass rush is very important and I've been vocal about it for a while but I don't think we're going to be able to develop a four-man rush comparable to certain playoff-caliber teams with the lack of cap space and holes to go along. I would love to develop a four-man rush but the interior of the DL is in trouble if we lose Campbell and Williams with no obvious successor there. It's going to be challenging to improve on certain aspects of the defense this off-season and the FO has their work cut out for them. Losing Campbell and Williams and not replacing them would be a huge blow. The 49ers and Rams are pretty good against the run. Bucs weren't all that great in the secondary and even though they had a great pass rush last year they were elite at stopping the run.
A lot of those teams listed have explosive offenses and can win a shoot-out. Greenbay playoffs losses in recent memory mostly came off the heels of their inability to stop the run. I'm not saying we have to be elite, but we can't afford a massive drop-off with this personnel.
I think he’s trying to say something more like if you can’t make teams somewhat one dimensional it’s hard to rush the passer.
kind of a dated way of thinking but until pretty recently it was true. Like if a team can run the ball all over you then it’s hard to call a defense with the purpose of covering receivers and rushing the qb because then they’ll continue to gash you. The modern nfl though it’s more about your offense applying pressure to the opposing offense, turning many games into shootouts, which is why that school of thought is phasing out
Well realistically, defenses making a team one dimensional doesn't really happen anymore. There's not a defense in this league that exists that can simply stop one unit from doing something on one side of the ball. There's no defense good enough to completely halt a teams running game, and there's no defense that's anywhere close to halting a quality passing attack.I think he’s trying to say something more like if you can’t make teams somewhat one dimensional it’s hard to rush the passer.
kind of a dated way of thinking but until pretty recently it was true. Like if a team can run the ball all over you then it’s hard to call a defense with the purpose of covering receivers and rushing the qb because then they’ll continue to gash you. The modern nfl though it’s more about your offense applying pressure to the opposing offense, turning many games into shootouts, which is why that school of thought is phasing out