JoeyFlex5
Hall of Famer
I mean tbf all it takes is a good year of drafting and FA, staying healthy, and landing a qb. That’s asking a whole lot thoughSoon as we get rid of lamar and “ capitalize”… we will be the worst team in division
I mean tbf all it takes is a good year of drafting and FA, staying healthy, and landing a qb. That’s asking a whole lot thoughSoon as we get rid of lamar and “ capitalize”… we will be the worst team in division
79% of stats are made up63% of Ravens fans are wrong
The next time Mike Sando says anything positive about a black quarterback will be the first. When I first noticed the pattern, I thought it was probably coinicidence, but in the 3 years since, whenever I've read or listened to him, he's consistently been critical of black QBs and forgiving of white ones.Was reading an article from Mike Sando on The Athletic and he addressed the Lamar situation. Said he expects him to play on the tag in 2023, but isn't convinced that the Ravens won't risk it and do the non-exclusive and let other teams negotiate for us. Basically said he doesn't feel the market for Lamar will be near as robust as many think, largely due to his contract demands, the trade package in return, and the fact that you'd need to build an entirely new offense around him (which is hard without those picks).
Did mention the risk associated with a non-exclusive tag as well.
He is the punkiest of all punks out there that hates Lamar Jackson and belittles him every chance he gets. Jeremy Fowler's identical twin.The next time Mike Sando says anything positive about a black quarterback will be the first. When I first noticed the pattern, I thought it was probably coinicidence, but in the 3 years since, whenever I've read or listened to him, he's consistently been critical of black QBs and forgiving of white ones.
Of course he doesn't feel any team will trade for Lamar, and that he needs a Roman style offense to succeed. He'd say the same about Hurts before telling you Fields is terrible and Gino's over-rated etc.
Not just Lamar. He still has the mindset that black QBs lack 'leadership' 'intangibles' and all the other code words.He is the punkiest of all punks out there that hates Lamar Jackson and belittles him every chance he gets. Jeremy Fowler's identical twin.
I'd be shocked if they didn't use the exclusive, but Sando is far from the first to mention the possibility. Overall, feel like it's less an indictment on Lamar's trade value and more on the side of him probably not getting the contract offer that he wants.If it's true (this is all speculation) that the league wouldn't trade Lamar for 3 first rounders, just wow. Maybe that's a function of his asking price being so high, but like idek.
The Ravens would have to be super super confident to use the nonexclusive
I can't wait for our boy to sign a big deal, so at lest those who laugh at your response and others who find Lamar's main issue is "intelligence" can choke and go cry in the corner.Soon as we get rid of lamar and “ capitalize”… we will be the worst team in division
It's a big story, so every possibility will be discussed but it's still very much a minority view that Lamar won't get everything he wants.I'd be shocked if they didn't use the exclusive, but Sando is far from the first to mention the possibility. Overall, feel like it's less an indictment on Lamar's trade value and more on the side of him probably not getting the contract offer that he wants.
While I actually love the idea of letting the market actually dictate his price tag and then the Ravens having a shot to react, the reality is that any smart time is going to offer two 1st rounders, and then put a big, big, big cap number out there in year 1 to make it extremely difficult for the Ravens to meet the price.I'd be shocked if they didn't use the exclusive, but Sando is far from the first to mention the possibility. Overall, feel like it's less an indictment on Lamar's trade value and more on the side of him probably not getting the contract offer that he wants.
And they really shouldn't beIf it's true (this is all speculation) that the league wouldn't trade Lamar for 3 first rounders, just wow. Maybe that's a function of his asking price being so high, but like idek.
The Ravens would have to be super super confident to use the nonexclusive
Gregg Rosenthal is wrong. Guaranteed contracts like the Watson deal should not happen. It's not a good think that they happen. Especially for people like Watson. I understand where Lamar is coming from, but the Ravens FOIt's a big story, so every possibility will be discussed but it's still very much a minority view that Lamar won't get everything he wants.
This, from Gregg Rosenthal, is how I see the situation
"Ravens execs clearly don't like the precedent that was set by the Browns when they fully guaranteed Deshaun Watson's $230 million contract. Kyler Murray received $160 million in guarantees from the Cardinals. Jackson is obviously a superior player to both and should expect nothing less. If certain NFL franchises don't want to guarantee contracts for their best players, maybe it's time they let those superstars go to teams that will. Every other major American sport provides guaranteed deals, even for role players. The Ravens are poised to use the exclusive tag on Jackson because they know other teams would give up first-round picks and a guaranteed contract to get the 2019 MVP. So he's absolutely right to stand his ground."
And the part that no one really wants to talk about is that in reality Lamar holds all the cards. He can choose the big payday of the franchise tag for this year and next and keep us over the proverbial barrel on the cap while collecting close to what he'd likely get in a long term deal as yearly pay, but then there's the "commitment" thing, too. If he's only on the Tag what commitment has the team demonstrated to him? So he remains de-incentivized to play with any kind of injury.I'd be shocked if they didn't use the exclusive, but Sando is far from the first to mention the possibility. Overall, feel like it's less an indictment on Lamar's trade value and more on the side of him probably not getting the contract offer that he wants.
I think by far the least likely scenario is Lamar plays two years under the tag as a Raven. By March 2024, if there's no long term deal, they'll tag and trade.And the part that no one really wants to talk about is that in reality Lamar holds all the cards. He can choose the big payday of the franchise tag for this year and next and keep us over the proverbial barrel on the cap while collecting close to what he'd likely get in a long term deal as yearly pay, but then there's the "commitment" thing, too. If he's only on the Tag what commitment has the team demonstrated to him? So he remains de-incentivized to play with any kind of injury.
Knowing the Ravens and how they've let stars walk for their cash-in contracts in the past, I just don't think this is any different with Lamar, except that he's too valuable to just let go. So for me the writing is still on the wall that he is going to prove too expensive for a thrifty club like us..
So maybe Lamar does have more of an incentive now to come to the table with the Ravens. A third straight year of missing time due to injury,should it happen, would reduce his value considerably.I think by far the least likely scenario is Lamar plays two years under the tag as a Raven. By March 2024, if there's no long term deal, they'll tag and trade.
I agree he has no incentive to play with an injury, but another year of injury concerns are going to impact how other teams view him and what they'll pay him.
so he should try to avoid a tag, which means he should agree to a contract.So maybe Lamar does have more of an incentive now to come to the table with the Ravens. A third straight year of missing time due to injury,should it happen, would reduce his value considerably.
If I was Lamar I would want a deal now. Just think if lets say he hurt is ankle and missed 2-3 games. That really hurts his value and teams will be convinced he is injury prone. Three years in a row is a very good sample sizeso he should try to avoid a tag, which means he should agree to a contract.
yeah. and this is why he needs a- drumroll please- AGENT!!!If I was Lamar I would want a deal now. Just think if lets say he hurt is ankle and missed 2-3 games. That really hurts his value and teams will be convinced he is injury prone. Three years in a row is a very good sample size
95% of stats are made up79% of stats are made up