Or the video I shared where he literally says itBut he did actually say it, and you provided the quote of him saying it. I don't know how else you would interpret those 2 paragraphs.
Or the video I shared where he literally says itBut he did actually say it, and you provided the quote of him saying it. I don't know how else you would interpret those 2 paragraphs.
Because Tank doesn't like Lamar and so it added fuel to the fire for him.
I thought you loved discussionEnd of day, the discussion bores me.
The 1-3 week timetable was always the optimistic one. It wasn't the "industry standard" one. Multiple medical personnel made that conclusion the moment it happened.
3 week absence puts him back this week, and that's the optimistic part of the timeline. Realistically, coming back this week doesn't make a ton of sense, because the Ravens don't have much to play for this week. They're already in playoffs, can't win the division this week no matter what they do, and frankly can only lose it. And I'm not totally convinced they're concerned if they do, either.
Stack that with the fact that the Ravens know they can beat the Steelers without Lamar (because they already did less than a month ago), and him playing this week doesn't pass a lot of the IQ tests.
If Bengals clinch division this week, I highly doubt you'll see Lamar next week either. If he does play, we'd be measuring his playing time in series, not quarters. Basically a preseason game.
If, for some reason, he doesn't make it back for a playoff game, I'll be the first one to jump aboard the "I'm now long term concerned" train. Could be that his PCL injury is worse than we think and he can't make it back, but that'll be 6 weeks missed and I'd think most franchise QBs would basically play on one leg for a playoff game if they could. Then I'd have questions about whether he's protecting himself due to no long-term deal.
And as everybody's aware by now, at least 50% of the reason he doesn't have a long term deal falls squarely on his own shoulders.
Hmmm. This seems contradictory to those who ran with the story that Lamar has been skipping on rehab.
Lol it’s literally all started with Preston and now he is back tracking because someone at the Sun or Ravens told him toBut there's an article from him in Baltimore Sun online today saying he's working "diligently" to get back.
I'M CONFUSED !!! https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports...0221229-7tcpdztjzbgethiigvmh3geybe-story.html
By the way- here is Mike Preston confirming he "heard" Lamar wasn't showing up for treatments.
Maybe but maybe notIs Lamar playing or not? That's all we need to know at this point lol.
The best part about people giving you a hard time right now is that they are bashing Preston as unreliable( Lamar lazy rumors) while also using Preston’s latest comments( the Sun source saying he made every treatment) to prove their thoughts on Lamar true.Wasn’t trying to defend him, or saying he was “believable”. I would not be one to defend Preston as I’ve never liked his writing or style. I was merely trying to point out that folks were taking a tweet from some random person and blowing it into a factual statement without researching what had actually been said.
The best part about people giving you a hard time right now is that they are bashing Preston as unreliable( Lamar lazy rumors) while also using Preston’s latest comments( the Sun source saying he made every treatment) to prove their thoughts on Lamar true.
Garret nailed it.
There is no way to confirm if Mikes original comments are true. I’m guessing they are probably half truths … i mean what 25 year old enjoys getting up early, eating healthy or regularly attending physical therapy?It's more that he's saying something now that directly contradicts something that he was reporting a while back.
The best part about people giving you a hard time right now is that they are bashing Preston as unreliable( Lamar lazy rumors) while also using Preston’s latest comments( the Sun source saying he made every treatment) to prove their thoughts on Lamar true.
Garret nailed it.
Because Tank doesn't like Lamar and so it added fuel to the fire for him.
But your using the same source tank used to defend your point while bashing the credibility of the source.classic confirmation bias
Did you post on the original ravens boards?But your using the same source tank used to defend your point while bashing the credibility of the source.
Moral of the story: credibility only matters if you disagree with the source lol
A long time ago I dabbled in the Ravens boards and I used to love the ones CBS sports had .Did you post on the original ravens boards?
Ok. This goes way back to those boards and the way certain posters would critique qb play and reports then to how they are now. Mike Preston has nothing to do with this... at least on 1 side if I had to guess.A long time ago I dabbled in the Ravens boards and I used to love the ones CBS sports had .
Difference here being that this is a clear source directly from the Ravens in this case. Not some super secret source. A very intentional leak. Context matters.But your using the same source tank used to defend your point while bashing the credibility of the source.
Moral of the story: credibility only matters if you disagree with the source lol
False. Many who responded don't give a shit what Preston says either way cause they're not listening to that idiot regardless. I just have a feeling had this been said about a previous QB he wouldn't be quoting it. But I get it. People have their favorites.
Never forget https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-2002-04-21-0204210199-story.html
But I didn't need this new leak to know that what Preston said initially was BS and I posted as much prior. I find it funny that Preston is doing a complete 180, but the report that just came out isn't surprising at all.But your using the same source tank used to defend your point while bashing the credibility of the source.
Moral of the story: credibility only matters if you disagree with the source lol