For some reason Duvernay is considered a trash receiver to some Ravens fans. He is now the new Tandon Doss or David Reed. If that receiver doesn't run routes like Derrick Mason or Odell Beckham then he is considered a bum.
Yeah. I actually rather like Duvernay. I want him to stay on this team, and I don't think we are cutting himFor some reason Duvernay is considered a trash receiver to some Ravens fans. He is now the new Tandon Doss or David Reed. If that receiver doesn't run routes like Derrick Mason or Odell Beckham then he is considered a bum.
Why is Duv getting caught in the crossfire? He was looking pretty effective last season until Roman suddenly decided to cut him out of the offense and he barely got a target for the rest of the year.
I'd like to bring back Demarcus Robinson next season on a similar contract, but as our #3 WR. Who our #2 will be next season is yet to be seen.notably he barely got a target after Bateman went down
suddenly he got extra attention and couldnt get open
also his hands and confidence took a dive and he started dropping everything that did come his way
tbf even with his early season targets he wasnt getting open a ton either - just lamar was trusting him a bit on the outside to make some plays in contested/low-separation situations
he's perfectly fine as a WR4 but he disappeared when he was asked to be more than a WR2/3...
If he's actually in the number 3 role he can do a nice job. He can't be WR1. And no one would ordinarily ask him to. Thing is in a perfect world (which probably doesn't exist) he'd be WR4 because you'd have Bateman and make one nice draft pick and one nice FA acquisition.I'd like to bring back Demarcus Robinson next season on a similar contract, but as our #3 WR. Who our #2 will be next season is yet to be seen.
Duvernay is definitely an interesting case with the inflated salary and all of the others things going on. As a 3rd option in the offense, he was progressing nicely. Once he became option #1, he faltered. I also would not be shocked at all if the foot injury played into the demise because it coincidentally was tied with a loss of explosion out of him. Pure assumption, but it feels like his injury was a stress fracture type of deal that finally met its end. It's a lot of money for a guy like that, but not sure I'm ready to throw in the towel on his development.
If he's actually in the number 3 role he can do a nice job. He can't be WR1. And no one would ordinarily ask him to. Thing is in a perfect world (which probably doesn't exist) he'd be WR4 because you'd have Bateman and make one nice draft pick and one nice FA acquisition.
I hope he goes to Washington.
Robinson is such an enigma to me. Had some games where he looked like a baller and some games where he looked like he should be in the XFL. Absolutely no problems bringing him back at the minimum and seeing if you have other options that can beat him out. Much worse depth options to have though, in my opinion.I'd like to bring back Demarcus Robinson next season on a similar contract, but as our #3 WR. Who our #2 will be next season is yet to be seen.
Adding one WR isn't going to cut it. The bottom one is what I'd bank on. I would anticipate one veteran signing of "some note" (nothing expensive but at least somebody with a track record) and then a WR drafted before the end of day 2, and probably another one late.that's the ideal
Bateman + someone new + Robinson is ok
Bateman + someone new + someone new + Robinson is pretty good
Adding one WR isn't going to cut it. The bottom one is what I'd bank on. I would anticipate one veteran signing of "some note" (nothing expensive but at least somebody with a track record) and then a WR drafted before the end of day 2, and probably another one late.
I think they could bring in Robinson or similar later in FA for the vet minimum, so I'm not concerned if we bring him back.
Only way I see Duvernay back is on a short-term extension for not much money ($3-4M a year, tops) or if we cut him outright in March, he goes to the market, finds basically nothing, then comes back for like a $2M payday or something like that. Basically he'd have to take like a 50% paycut.
Deal for Lamar is pretty damn close to what I’d have in mind…![]()
2023 NFL Free Agent Rankings: Top 200 players set to enter free agency
We look at the 200 best players set to hit the free-agent market this offseason with free agency less than a week away.www.pff.com
Deal for Lamar is pretty damn close to what I’d have in mind…
I mean I don't really care too much about the AAV, but I really don't under the "desire" to be in the $52-53M range.maybe it pushes up to 275
but i think 200+ guaranteed would do it
Also, I'll gladly be wrong, but I don't think there's any chance in hell the Seahawks give Geno 4/150 with over $100M gtd.Deal for Lamar is pretty damn close to what I’d have in mind…
No you won’tAlso, I'll gladly be wrong