You’re misunderstanding the whole thing.. first of all, I was on Ramsey’s train long before he was the most hyped prospect, when I told people in 2015 I liked him over bosa I was given a mountain of shit for it. I didn’t want Stanley over Ramsey but the trajectory they were on and the state of our franchise, it looked like Stanley was a better fit because our secondary is elite and the OL isn’t and Stanley was looking like he was gonna be an elite LT really up until this year. Is Stanley a better player? Fuck no, value? Fuck no, talent? Fuck no. Does he fill a bigger void? Absolutely.
And yes we had a problem with Humphrey’s deep ball, but tell me how many corners come out of college naturally with great ball skills and ability to turn their heads... not many. Vernon Hargreaves had some of the best ball skills for a corner prospect and look how he turned out. Truly elite ball skill corners with size and the athleticism and skill to mirror receivers don’t come around that often, hell pat Pete doesn’t even fill all the blanks. The total package for athleticism, skill, and ball skills was marshon lattimore, Marcus Peters to an extent also, nearly all corners have shortcomings, and turning your head is something that believe it or not a lot of guys develop, jimmy was worse than Humphrey turning his head in his early years and he was exposed in coverage far more often than Humphrey has been.
That’s the problem I have with your opinion on humphrey, it comes with a bottom line that he’s maxed out and will never develop, and it comes with the bottom line that if you aren’t perfect then you aren’t good.