Oh noApparently, when he was a college player he used to drive 100s of miles after games to "lead the worship" at his church. Harbaugh will eat that up - he seems more passionate about religion than about football these days.
That would be a lateral move for Canales then. Not sure why he'd do that.If I was The Ravens I would hire Todd Monken and Dave Canales. Make Monken the OC and Canales the QB coach/passing game coordinator maybe even add Assistant head coach to his title as well then call it a day
Admittedly I don't know a ton about Monken, other than his offenses at GA have been very good, but doesn't he utilize TEs in the passing game quite a bit in his schemes?So looks like the 3 favourites right now that we’ve heard about 2nd interviews or further interest:
Dave canales
Todd monken
Eric bieniemy
Think I’d be happy with any of those 3
Exactly my thought processAdmittedly I don't know a ton about Monken, other than his offenses at GA have been very good, but doesn't he utilize TEs in the passing game quite a bit in his schemes?
Not necessarily saying that's a bad thing, given our TE room looks a hell of a lot better than our WR room at the moment, but I would think that would turn off the crowd that wants to see less 12 or 22 personnel groupings and see more 11 personnel groupings.
That would be a lateral move for Canales then. Not sure why he'd do that.
No, if we would do that then make EB OC and Canales do what you saidIf I was The Ravens I would hire Todd Monken and Dave Canales. Make Monken the OC and Canales the QB coach/passing game coordinator maybe even add Assistant head coach to his title as well then call it a day
Doesn't turn me off one bit. I just want to see better routes from our WRs and more spacing, which his offense does have. I agree with Rossi that my top choices are Bieniemy, Canales and Monken and in no particular order.Admittedly I don't know a ton about Monken, other than his offenses at GA have been very good, but doesn't he utilize TEs in the passing game quite a bit in his schemes?
Not necessarily saying that's a bad thing, given our TE room looks a hell of a lot better than our WR room at the moment, but I would think that would turn off the crowd that wants to see less 12 or 22 personnel groupings and see more 11 personnel groupings.
1. We don't know that it's more $. It might be, but he's interviewing for OC jobs, not the job he has.Well for one it's more money, if he ends up helping Lamar Jackson transform his game then that's more coaching opportunities for another team as OC, and again more money. He's been coaching with the Seahawks for quite sometime he may want to branch off to see if getting with another team can further advance his career. Him legit being like The Raven passing game coordinator and The Ravens passing game jumps off then that would do wonders for his resume.
I still like Slowik, but I would be fine with everyone here. Imagine the Ravens just turn around an say "we're hiring Terell Suggs"Doesn't turn me off one bit. I just want to see better routes from our WRs and more spacing, which his offense does have. I agree with Rossi that my top choices are Bieniemy, Canales and Monken and in no particular order.
Have no issue with the list. Just pointing out complaints I've seen.Doesn't turn me off one bit. I just want to see better routes from our WRs and more spacing, which his offense does have. I agree with Rossi that my top choices are Bieniemy, Canales and Monken and in no particular order.
I agree, feel we are very close in the process. Depends on where EB is on their list. It's possible he has already had one interview that we haven't heard about.Have no issue with the list. Just pointing out complaints I've seen.
Canales seems to be the only guy I haven't really heard negatives about.
Will be interesting what happens in the next week or so. Given we're on second interviews, would think we're pretty damn close to hiring. But if we're really waiting on EB, then obviously it'll be another 10+ days to interview him once or twice.
So looks like the 3 favourites right now that we’ve heard about 2nd interviews or further interest:
Dave canales
Todd monken
Eric bieniemy
Think I’d be happy with any of those 3
Looks like top 3 for sure.
Don’t know much about Canales. Are we the only one interviewing him for the OC position?
Admittedly I don't know a ton about Monken, other than his offenses at GA have been very good, but doesn't he utilize TEs in the passing game quite a bit in his schemes?
Not necessarily saying that's a bad thing, given our TE room looks a hell of a lot better than our WR room at the moment, but I would think that would turn off the crowd that wants to see less 12 or 22 personnel groupings and see more 11 personnel groupings.