im not the one complaining about not having any chemistry woman.
i did not even bring it up.
you did.
im not blaming anyone for it.
im telling you that its a FACT that flacco got injured which is a direct indisputable cause of him and the receivers having no chemistry.
IF you want to keep on yapping about there being not chemisty then YOU should start with the guy that guy injured which is also the most important person as well.
However he does seem to have chemistry with Watson and Woodhead off the bat.
Hmmm perhaps its cause they are veteran players.
Hmmm just like SSS and Boldin and Wallace last year.
Wait maybe, just maybe flacco works better with veteran players.
So if flacco does better with veteran players , should we draft rookies or get veteran players?
Its actually funny how most of you want the best for flacco yet actually cry about things that dont work for him....
No you are the one yapping about cap spending when that wasn't even the point.
And you are the one yapping about issues like someone was ONLY referencing THIS season when the discussion was overall.
Who says he ONLY has chemistry with vets? lol What a joke. How would we even know? The two times we've actually seen him with a rookie?
Perhaps if you'd read the entire conversation you'd understand the points being made and stop bringing up things that have no bearing on it then right?
Let me help:
1. It was about addressing the offense through the draft: specifically the receiving corp.
2. It was not about spending.
3. It was about the FOs failure to do so early on and leaving any real effort until 2015.
4. It was also about the FOs failure to actually recognize such talent within the draft.
5. Chemistry was mentioned within the framework of having some consistency instead of a carousel of aging vets for nine years.
Or perhaps you're doing what you always do, even on the old boards. Smoke and bullshit because you don't want to answer the question.
Hard to find a quality receiver when you only draft higher than round three twice in nine years, wouldn't you agree?