JoeyFlex5
Hall of Famer
What’s this? It’s too small I can’t tellseven???
View attachment 2262
What’s this? It’s too small I can’t tellseven???
View attachment 2262
There's a reason why there's a JoeyFlex5 meltdown thread. Picks like Swift (and maybe Murray) would expand that thread tenfold. Speaking of threads, @SepticeyePoe , is there going to a meltdown 2.0 thread or should we just bump the old thread?
The admin has spoken, lol. Might as well keep the fun in one place.bump the old thread
I dnt thinks its good to use analytics on trading up success unless we are going by our own history.. i think that was a smoke screen by decosta especially when in the past, we have tried to trade up ,and each one of those players( ramsey,lattimore,mack) all have had great careers... is he talking about players success being “50/50”? or trading up with the team being a 50/50 chance of them accepting the deal?just from the way he talked to me it sounds like they arent expecting to pick murray or queen themselves - maybe that's a double bluff type deal where they want teams to think they're trying to make it sound like they're not interested but philosophically it makes sense for us not to be that interested in a LB high up
what was most clear in the conference call was that EDC reads a lot of studies on the draft and analytics about the draft in terms of picks etc. and it felt pretty honest - and those sorts of studies are normally strong on 2 different things:
the draft is largely dominated by luck so the more picks you have (within reason) the better your odds - that 1st round trade ups are fundamentally risky unless you think you're getting an elite talent and even then it might not be worth it given that those studies indicate teams only found success with those trade ups maybe 50% of the time
the other thing is the importance of positional value and round value coming together - basically LBs and RBs are replaceable enough and non-valuable in a way that makes it hard to justify taking them in the 1st round from a team-building perspective
so i agree that he believes what's being said but the 2 statements that i think were more misleading were the WR one (which was prompted by being asked what he meant on his joint presser conference call where he said the WR class was prolific) and the LB one where he was specifically asked about Queen and Murray
I absolutely believe him on 1st round trade ups and TEs
he was too specific about those 1st round OTs and what they offer moving inside for that to be a lie - only notable thing was that he name-checked Jedrick Wills, Tristan Wirfs and Mekhi Becton and completely left out Andrew Thomas - i wonder if that was a misspeak, a conscious decision to maybe make other team's second guess their Thomas evaluation, or maybe the Ravens dont view him as a first round talent - any of those 3 options are interesting
I dnt thinks its good to use analytics on trading up success unless we are going by our own history.. i think that was a smoke screen by decosta especially when in the past, we have tried to trade up ,and each one of those players( ramsey,lattimore,mack) all have had great careers... is he talking about players success being “50/50”? or trading up with the team being a 50/50 chance of them accepting the deal?
A shot of us sending 7What’s this? It’s too small I can’t tell
Ahh. Looked good too. Everyone was coveredA shot of us sending 7
No reason to believe Eric is pressed on choir boy status the way Ozzie was.We're drafting murray, trust me. murray has been able to wow people with his charachter and as you know that'll go a long way for a team like ours.
Glad you accepted it. Your life will now be less stressful. I encourage others to do the same. Stop resisting and accept the inevitable.We're drafting murray, trust me. murray has been able to wow people with his charachter and as you know that'll go a long way for a team like ours.
I see what you mean now but i feels its just not accurate to base something off others teams success when talking trading up for players.. we have a whole different scouting team, management and everything you know. Not to mention, every pick you take is 50/50 regardless of where you pick.i think they're referring to the players being successful
and with regards to trading up we also tried to trade up for haason reddick...
as EDC said in the pre-draft group presser... sometimes the best trades are the ones you dont make...
philosophically i dont think EDC likes the idea of trading up in the 1st round - because he's a guy who likes smart analytics and analytics suggest more picks not fewer picks - but he's also a football guy who learned under Ozzie so he also learned that you also have to make a pick
ultimately you trust your evaluations but you also have to trust how and where you value them
and you cant just use our own history of trading up in the 1st round because we havent done it very often... we traded back into the 1st round in 2018 (not sure whether that statistically counts - but ill include it) which obviously has worked out great, we traded up 3 picks to get michael oher in 2009, and joe flacco in 2008, technically we traded up 1 spot for Haloti Ngata, we traded up from our 2nd round pick (using a future 1st rounder) to get Kyle Boller in 2003, for travis taylor in 2000
that's 6 times in ravens history we've gone up in the draft with very mixed results - but that's not enough to study trends especially when all bar 1 happened before 2010... you have to look at other teams
Sort of. Browns went for it and converted on 4th and 1 and then scored a TD.eh?
that's a stop isnt it?
58 Prospects confirmed to participate in the Virtual Draft....
I see what you mean now but i feels its just not accurate to base something off others teams success when talking trading up for players.. we have a whole different scouting team, management and everything you know. Not to mention, every pick you take is 50/50 regardless of where you pick.
Im gonna assume he was talking about elite level success when regarding the 50/50 thing. Cause smart as our staff is, i just dont believe they would just go into this thing thinking “ we arent trading up because the chance of that player being good is a 50/50 chance”... other teams bad scouting and evaluation shouldnt stop us from making moves we wanna make
Edit: maybe im just over thinking it
Someone convince me one way or another on uche.
From day one, since LONNGGG AGO when he was regarded as a round 3/4 type, I was a huge fan, I loved his film about as much as anyone I had watched, I’ve watched more of him than anyone in this class which admittedly doesn’t mean much because I’ve watched much less film the past 2 years than I used to, but anyway...
He is so goddamn consistently great on film. From the edge, standup or 3 point, he shows incredible pass rush talent, his fire off the snap is as good as anyone in the class, his bend is probably the best in the class as he uses that short frame and absurd flexibility to drop that upper body so low to the ground he’s got shoulders at the OTs waist level while maintaining speed and balance, it’s absurd. His finishing ability is through the roof as well, when he turns that arc he is gonna impact the throw, he is so good at squaring up after the bend and stepping on the gas and securing the tackle.
He packs a punch when he engages in a skinnier rush, that short frame is put to good use as he comes from down low and gives shocking blows to the blockers core, really staggering guys and creating space and putting them on their heels so he can make his next move. Not a power guy, but really can get up in your shit and back you off a bit so he can let that quickness shine.
slippery, he does a great job using that quickness and flexibility in the run game as well, he slides through traffic very well and blockers just never get clean blocks on him, he’s a pain in the ass for an OL because you can knock him around a bit but you can’t latch and drive, ever, he’s too slippery and quick and nifty with his hands.
he’s a stud of an off ball LB, his vision and pursuit rival the likes of a Patrick queen, and he can engage a blocker with the same violence that a queen can, but is a surer tackler with much better length. He’s stellar in coverage too, great vision on the qb, great zone awareness, positions himself beautifully, not much for ball skills, but can prevent completions.
bad things I’ve seen on tape:
When he doesn’t get the speed advantage off the jump, he tends to have a bad approach, he will often go 2 hands full bull rush square in the blockers chest which plain and simple won’t work for him.
literally, the only problem I have with this guy, is tyus bowser, haasson reddick, those types of guys. They make it hard to commit.
ok, what will you do if they don't draft Murray. Maybe stay quiet until the 2021 season.We're drafting murray, trust me. murray has been able to wow people with his charachter and as you know that'll go a long way for a team like ours.