Ok, so they have a picked some really talented players. I agree with you there, but look at the players they have passed on while on the clock, ie Wentz and Watson. One of which the coach really wanted in Wentz. If the staff and coach aren’t working well together something has to be fixed. I’m not so sure I want this staff picking a qb if they have already passed on two really good options, maybe even three if you count Goff.i disagree, they've compiled strong elements of a roster with promising/burgeoning players at key positions on both offence and defence - no one should be expected to turn a trainwreck of a team like cleveland around in 2 years - 3 seems to be a legitimate period - look at how oakland and jacksonville were doing after 2 years and how they suddenly looked promising in year 3 after keeping their "maligned" front office - i do think they need/should really consider a coaching change because they dont have the worst roster in the NFL at all but somehow cant even fall into more than 1 win in their last 28 games - that's ridiculous and nothing to do with talent at all
for me it makes no sense not to finish this front office project they have going - all the best players on their team have come from this new regime and there are only 1 or 2 holdovers from previous front offices which tells you all you need to know about the talent they had before - i realise it seems extra critical because they have the 1st pick in a strong (looking) qb draft but fear should not be driving anyone in that organisation's decision making