I just watched the presser myself I'm only paraphrasing here. But that's basically what he said.
EDIT:
too vague to make predictions and it depends whether they are continuing their philosophy from last year or whether its changed but its clear that a general level of athleticism at the position was important last year albeit they got 2 distinct kinds of athletes - they got hollywood who has game-breaking speed mixed with suddenness and they got boykin who is the classic height/weight/speed triangle prospect with great RAS scores but less of a technician
it would suggest there's a bench-mark of athleticism that they look for - and you can see that going back through most of the wrs they've picked even in the mid-rounds, on both picks that worked out and picks that didn't: chris moore, jaleel scott, torrey smith, breshad perriman, tommy streeter, tandon doss, darren waller, aaron mellette, maybe even jordan lasley...
you could argue that until last year (with hollywood) the only real outlier for the last decade (as far as I could be bothered to go back) was michael campanaro and maybe keenan reynolds (does he even count?)
my hope is that with hollywood we've started to value other characteristics more - being a technician as a route runner (or at least showing the capability to become a quality route-runner) and not worrying about those triangle statistics in the same way that we clearly did previously - at other positions we've always emphasised tape and traits over measurables (like the front office's old adage that sacks translate) and yet at wr we seem to have in the past emphasised athletic testing
my hope is that yes we're continuing to look to build a track team around lamar but that maybe we emphasise technicians over triangle prospects - i dont know - pure speculation
