I know I do this a lot but I wanna keep shouting out Brandon Stephens. Like how is he doing what he's doing?
The guy has only been playing defense for 2 years and that was at CB. Trained at SMU, not really a football powerhouse and then comes in and is starting in Winks defense at S, a position he's literally never played.
I'm not saying he's amazing, he certainly has made his fair share of mistakes, but we've seen much worse S play on this team by real safeties.
I think to be playing this well as a rookie in a new position and relatively new to this side of the ball, he's got a really bright future.
at least it sounds like only 1 today
but obviously we saw how quickly 1 can become an outbreak last year
Yeah hopefully this is all
Definitely a hit to the depth though. Redmond on our PS is the only other health guy with C experience I believe.
funny. I thought about that when I saw this post, but didn't mention it.Must have been all those practice reps he had in the Hospital. Quick send our OL to a Hospital and start doing blocking reps there.
it was very telling when he was already entering as the 3rd safety in preseason and as dimebacker - at the time i assumed jimmy smith would take some of that role back when he returned but he didnt
EDC clearly loved him in that post-day 2 draft presser... coaches hadn't even got to say they'd try him at corner first before he was talking about him as a future free safety
there are some flashes every week where you see his explosive qualities and instincts and think he can be very very good - although we learned this week that he's been infected by marlon's apparently contagious case of feet for hands
Hahaha idk why we have dropped so many ints this year. I feel like Clark has at least 2 bad drops as well
how they like statistics ...
filmstudy vs Steelers:
Zeitler: Kevin fell out of the A/B range for the first time since week 3 in Detroit. He was responsible for ¼ sack (Q1, 1:56). He was party to 3 pressures (Q1, 11:17, beaten inside by NT Adams, ½ charge; Q3, 11:18, bulled by DT Chris Wormley; Q4, 1:12, bulled by Wormley). He also surrendered 1.5 penetrations. He missed 3 blocks, all of which were losses at the LoS. He made 2 blocks in level 2 block but did not have a pancake or highlight. He had 2 points on 4 pulls.
Scoring: 69 plays, 60 blocks, 3 missed, 1.5 penetrations, 2.5 pressures, 1/4 sack, 50.5 points (.73 per play). That’s a C- after adjustment.
.
who lies? or do they only have criteria difference with nfl on cbs?
Is it a reason to be the know-it-all over another user with an opinion?
That is the problem of the Internet, instead of debating the why, they look for someone who gives them the reason for their opinion to feel superior
He said it was his first game below A / B since the Detroit game in week 3 to be specific.i mean there's just differences in how they measure stuff
CBS were specific in that they said no sacks and no hits - they didn't say anything about pressures
and worth pointing out that Ken is one of the very few people who portions out the blame for sacks - most stats places assign the whole sack to one player and don't share the blame around - so it's likely the 1/4 sack assigned to zeitler by Ken was assigned in whole to someone else by most other stat counters - and even then Ken in that excerpt talked about that being Zeitler's first C or below game since week 3...
idk that either of those statements are particularly in conflict with each other - both in their own way have talked about how good Zeitler's been all year - CBS with less context and Ken with more context and different measurements...
for example PFF think he was really good against the Browns and fairly average against the Steelers too (but still good enough to be a top 5 graded player although that says more about the performances of the rest of the team in that game generally than it does about Zeitler)
First of all, the sources of opinions have no relevance to the actual validity of said opinions. None. They're exist without us. We don't paten them, they don't go with us to the afterlife. Just because the critique came from someone on the same platform, doesn't suddenly disprove the notion any less. An infant child's literal first words could've been, "Cutting our best pass blocking lineman isn't the best idea," and the point would've stood just the same.I said it, and I stand by it.
The statistics are a number but they have a context, being Villanueva, Phillips, Powers, why are they going to attack the Zeitler side?
football is a team game, the line is a team game, the worst line, the one with the most catches.
yanda allowed captures but to run there was always a highway, even with ducasse.
You can defend what you want, I will defend mine, but do not try to underestimate my opinion for a few numbers, we may not agree, and we can discuss it, but you are just like me, a user in a forum
Which might be the biggest takeaway of the assessment.He said it was his first game below A / B since the Detroit game in week 3 to be specific.
I mean, I'm a little confused by your statement here. What exactly is the issue? That somebody who does offensive line grading has a different opinion than literally anybody who posts on the internet?how they like statistics ...
filmstudy vs Steelers:
Zeitler: Kevin fell out of the A/B range for the first time since week 3 in Detroit. He was responsible for ¼ sack (Q1, 1:56). He was party to 3 pressures (Q1, 11:17, beaten inside by NT Adams, ½ charge; Q3, 11:18, bulled by DT Chris Wormley; Q4, 1:12, bulled by Wormley). He also surrendered 1.5 penetrations. He missed 3 blocks, all of which were losses at the LoS. He made 2 blocks in level 2 block but did not have a pancake or highlight. He had 2 points on 4 pulls.
Scoring: 69 plays, 60 blocks, 3 missed, 1.5 penetrations, 2.5 pressures, 1/4 sack, 50.5 points (.73 per play). That’s a C- after adjustment.
.
who lies? or do they only have criteria difference with nfl on cbs?
Is it a reason to be the know-it-all over another user with an opinion?
That is the problem of the Internet, instead of debating the why, they look for someone who gives them the reason for their opinion to feel superior
Bateman's presser comes up at 13:58. He really has a great attitude.