good perspective on Roman and 2022
it will ultimately somewhat come down to what lamar thinks of roman
They"ll pay Lamar, then lose many players worth keeping and therefore remain/ become a mediocre team for years to come. But the stands will remain full because people will pay to see Lamar, he"ll be the draw. I want to know how tge Rams afford all the top talent they've signed, and how they all remain so healthy, covid not withstanding
Malik literally got shot
good perspective on Roman and 2022
it will ultimately somewhat come down to what lamar thinks of roman
I don't think a ton of people are going to like this because there are obviously other huge needs like OL and DL and secondary, but nonetheless here it goes.
A huge draft need for the Baltimore Ravens is TE. We were EXCEPTIONALLY lucky to have Andrews be healthy all year. Imagine if he's out for even one game. Even with a healthy Boyle we've got 0 and I mean 0 receiving threat without Andrews.
I'm not asking for a 1st rounder but if we learned anything from this season it's, if you know your depth at a position us poor, a la Tackle, you might want to invest in it. So gimme a real TE3 so we can get back to the days of Andrews, Boyle, and Hurst making people PAY.
I don't think a ton of people are going to like this because there are obviously other huge needs like OL and DL and secondary, but nonetheless here it goes.
A huge draft need for the Baltimore Ravens is TE. We were EXCEPTIONALLY lucky to have Andrews be healthy all year. Imagine if he's out for even one game. Even with a healthy Boyle we've got 0 and I mean 0 receiving threat without Andrews.
I'm not asking for a 1st rounder but if we learned anything from this season it's, if you know your depth at a position us poor, a la Tackle, you might want to invest in it. So gimme a real TE3 so we can get back to the days of Andrews, Boyle, and Hurst making people PAY.
Then it doesn’t bode well for Roman’s future with us. You have to imagine the WRs would be in Lamar’s ear about GRo
i think the problem is that anyone good enough to be productive is going to take serious investment
and anyone we take late is unlikely to yield enough talent to be a backup to Andrews
i see it as far more likely that in the event that andrews goes down for a game or 2, that we see more 10 personnel
Can they pay Bozeman,who are we gonna lose because of lamar?
Can they pay Bozeman, Ricard, Elliot, Stone and Averett next year? Just some players that might be worth keepingThey"ll pay Lamar, then lose many players worth keeping and therefore remain/ become a mediocre team for years to come. But the stands will remain full because people will pay to see Lamar, he"ll be the draw. I want to know how tge Rams afford all the top talent they've signed, and how they all remain so healthy, covid not withstanding
Oh I hear you, my point with that was if Andrews goes down one game, your TE passing game is thrown out wack for a week. If he goes down for a season which is always possible, as the roster is currently constructed, that is potentially an unovercomable injury for us.
I cannot name one player on offense AFTER LAMAR, that would be as season effecting to lose as Andrews.
Oh I hear you, my point with that was if Andrews goes down one game, your TE passing game is thrown out wack for a week. If he goes down for a season which is always possible, as the roster is currently constructed, that is potentially an unovercomable injury for us.
I cannot name one player on offense AFTER LAMAR, that would be as season altering to lose as Andrews.
i mean tbf that's what happens with basically any star if you lose them for the season
look at what happened with the loss of MP
look at what happened with the loss of Marlon
look at what happened with the loss of Ronnie
we werent able to replace any of those guys and our season's likely over because of it
Can they pay Bozeman,
Can they pay Bozeman, Ricard, Elliot, Stone and Averett next year? Just some players that might be worth keeping
Agreed. But what I would say is on offense, we're prepared to lose a star at WR, we have the depth. With our running backs coming back, we could probably afford to lose ONE of them. We could afford to lose a G or C, we have the depth.
The two places we don't have the depth to afford to lose someone is T and TE.
T is more important 100%, but doesn't mean TE isn't still important
If you can account for quality depth at every single position, we'd be winning the SB nearly every year. You can only do so much with the cap constraints. Would much rather have a quality starter at a premium position than a TE3. Think you'll need to start looking at TE eventually as Boyle gets closer to 30 but it's not something pressing just yet.
But are you getting better than a Josh Oliver type anyways without exhausting a premium draft pick (i.e. day 1 or day 2)? Probably not. TE is typically a position that requires a sizable investment.
Agreed. But what I would say is on offense, we're prepared to lose a star at WR, we have the depth. With our running backs coming back, we could probably afford to lose ONE of them. We could afford to lose a G or C, we have the depth.
The two places we don't have the depth to afford to lose someone is T and TE.
T is more important 100%, but doesn't mean TE isn't still important