Sending 2 receivers out after all that motion only to throw into triple coverage.
So I don't think I mentioned it when it happened, but I'm partially "torn" on the analysis of this play.
For starters, I hate the play call IN THAT SPOT, but I don't hate the play call. Offense ain't doing nothing. Gotta create a big play somehow. If those goes for a TD, he's a genius. If this happens, he's a moron. There's no middle ground.
That being said, I'm torn. On the one hand, if you're going to call this play, you have to teach it in a way that the WR (Proche) understands its NOT a must-throw. If its being taught and designed as a must-throw, that's tremendously stupid.
On the other hand, is it reasonable to expect a WR to make that call? I honestly don't know. He's not usually in the business of reading defenses, but at the same time, I can 100% confidently say we've drawn up plays like this on hungover-after-Thanksgiving, past-prime, backyard tackle football games, and even the moron knows not to throw it into triple coverage, and when he basically can't even see the open receiver.
Plus I hate that the RB is the receiver in this spot.
Overall I hate it, BUT, I understand somehow why its called, and I think the WR needs a little better judgment here.