Well said people think this team will magically turn around and become the top offense in the league because of a rookie coming in and that's not the case. Watson was lucky to have a solid RB in Miller, a top 5 WR in Hopkins, and Fuller who is becoming one of the best deep threats in the league.
Even Carson Wentz and Jared Goofball struggled their rookie years due to lack of talent around them. Eagles went out and got Blount, Ajayi, Jeffery, Torrey Smith. Rams went and got Woods, Watkins, and drafted the most talented running back to come out of a draft in a long time in Gurley.
It isn't really this simple at all and I wish people would stop trying to make it simple.
Did you watch Watson, Wentz, or Goff play at all at any points in their NFL career? Goff looked overwhelmed largely in part because STL was running a more pro style offense that asked him to play under center when he came from a spread style offense in college where he barely ran a huddle. Wentz was a division 1 FBS quarterback. The jump from NDSU to the NFL was IMMENSE. And it showed for both of these rookies. Also, Gurley was there a year before Goff was drafted.
I remember people on the old board, NFL.com, ESPN, etc. really, really questioned whether or not Robert Woods was a good signing and really made it clear as day that they hated the signing and the trade for Watkins really hasn't paid dividends like the Rams had thought. He's not a big part of that offense at all and he's not exactly what they expected he would be for them.
Getting back to watching them, there is such a clear difference in their ability to work through their reads, throw with sound mechanics, and create when plays aren't there. I can't tell you how often I watch Wentz and I'm just like, "Here's a sack," and then out of no where he comes out with a touchdown pass on a beautiful throw under pressure.
Getting the weapons of Wentz, Watson, or Goff would not be some magical fix at all, and even less so than getting a new quarterback. Joe doesn't work through is progressions at all, doesn't step into throws, and he's generally a statue. Houston was the first game where I saw any willingness to run with the ball and it was a heaven-send.
These teams invested in their offenses because they had seen enough to invest in their offenses and believed that their quarterbacks were capable of taking the next step with better weapons. If you had Brian Hoyer, would you invest in loads of money? No, probably not because he won't ever be elite. That's what we're now facing with Flacco.
Sure, he probably has closer to 6.0, 6.5 YPA and probably more like 15 touchdowns and 7 or 8 interceptions instead, but it isn't a significant uptick enough to sacrifice what is being built on defense, which can be very special and has already posted three shutouts.
Joe is creating most of the issues for himself. I always say this, but people get really excited for Ronnie Stanley, the signing of Danny Woodhead, Jeremy Maclin, Austin Howard, etc., until they see Joe play and then everyone likes to put the issues on them instead of Joe. These guys all showed they could play elsewhere and have shown they have play making ability here in Baltimore. Have to put the ball in their hands accurately or trust your line to do their job.