Listen, I'm saying this knowing I'm gonna get a lot of "really, come on, you're just being a hater/flacco homeboy"
Ive moved on, and I'm all in for Lamar. I think he has tons of potential and one bad game doesn't mean much in the grand scheme of things.
but I can't help but notice how Lamar puts up lots of stats and wins on mediocre teams, but can't beat the best and really hasn't had any performances in the clutch.
Flacco is in most ways more limited than Lamar, even comparing Flacco to Lamar in his prime.
But man, I miss one thing about Flacco - when we were behind and in big games, I knew he COULD and many times had stepped up.
Lamar is still young, I just want to see him progress and be able to light it up not just to bear up on inferior teams but to help carry his team to victory in the tough games and moments in the clutch.
I remember Flacco in that Vikings game in 2009, the Texans and Falcons games in 2010, Steelers and Pats in 2011, so many moments where Flacco played his best while the team let him down, sometimes so much that his comeback efforts were foiled by missed field goals or defensive gaffles. But with Flacco, we could be down 14 with 5 minutes left and I wouldn't turn the tv off. Unfortunately with Lamar, we get down two scores at any point in the game and I get discouraged easily.
I don't regret moving on from Flacco with Lamar, I just get frustrated that he has all this talent but seems to be developing a habit of choking in bigger moments.
Yeah, this is revisionist history a bit for me...
1. You're painting way too rosy a picture of Joe. Joe had plenty of non-clutch moments in big games also, especially early in his career (which is where Lamar is currently). For starters, if we assume all playoff games are big games, Joe was genuinely bad as a QB for his first 5 playoff games. Not good, not even average. Just bad. By pretty much any metric you can come up with. We won 3 of those games, but Joe's job was quite literally to hand the ball off and not throw turnovers. And he didn't even do that very well in his losses. He got ate up by Pittsburgh in the AFC title game in 08, and was horrible for the entirety of the 2009 playoffs.
There are many instances, even later in his career, where Joe would get intercepted, fumble, etc. in close, key games.
2. Lamar is beating good teams consistently. The only team that he's basically not beating is KC. That's it. Last year he beat SF, New England, and Seattle. He probably won't have teams like that on his resume this year, because they're not on our schedule.
If anything, its the opposite. Joe had very, very, very few "big game" wins in the regular season in his career. Most were against Pittsburgh. Even in 2011 and 2012, we had losses to teams that were perceived as better than us.
Lamar is beating everybody in the regular season (except for KC). He's just not winning playoff games, though again, that sample size is pretty small.